data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c190/7c1909c57ef0b4b52737426847e3ed7c36075597" alt="Yoshi :yoshi: :yoshi:"
The only thing putting Yoshi in low tier in any game is somebody who makes a list.
Yoshi was good in 64. Everyone was good in 64. There were two tiers:
KirbzPikaNess tier and
notKirbzPikaNess tier. Yoshi was good.
Yoshi was decent in Melee. He was his own kind of good and this sounds incredibly biased, but he was just good in his own way. Out of all the other "low tier" characters, he easily had some of the best top and high tier matchups--all of his worst matchups, save Peach and Samus, were in low and bottom tier. He had so many technical tricks, I still haven't mastered them all and I'm still studying even one that is taking years to decipher.
Yoshi is good in Brawl. He has playable top tier matchups; someone as "bad" as him doing so well against both Meta Knight AND Snake is a testament to itself, honestly. He completely demolishes low and bottom tier effortlessly (save Mario, who I think is mid anyway) and only really has trouble with characters that nobody plays anymore.
It's been a devastating cycle that will
never change. They don't like him. They won't like him. It doesn't matter how much work we do, and it doesn't matter how many results we get. It's just the truth. I've moved on a few years ago when I realized having something to prove was futile; I go to tournaments and have good matches with great players and anyone I've played can attest to the character; my skill is almost moot since I'm ridiculously bad at both Melee and Brawl, but yet have managed to beat people that are good because when I play well, Yoshi is a superstar and I don't even want to THINK about what I would be doing with Yoshi if I were actually good at either game.
So yeah, that's all I had to say. I think I'm going to take a break from this thread for a while.