Sigh.
I'll break it down.
Yoshi still has options. And it's not like we have any great Yoshi mains anyway; the best MK mains are much smarter players than the best Yoshi mains in the first place. Yoshi losing all the time means the MKs are much better players, not necessarily that Yoshi vs. MK is unwinnable, which is what other people are saying.
No.
Compare the number of options between Yoshi and Meta Knight. Imagine both parties playing to win.
Top Yoshi players lose to top Meta Knight players.
It's not the players that are important, necessarily, but it's the character's viability in a particular matchup at hand. Matchups are always examined at top levels of play, so we'll naturally assume both parties are knowledgable with their designated mains.
If Clouderz is, as you say, mediocre, imagine facing Mew2King or Dojo.
"But I'm an equally mediocre player!" No kidding. You live in Alberta.
On a serious note, it's safe to assume you're both around the same level.
You still lose the majority of games in a set. There's a reason why this happens.
lmao
Saying I've never implied that my matches mean anything is not the same as saying I'm posting for no reason. >.> I made my original post to question the extreme pessimism on the match-up expressed by the posts above mine. I'm implying something, just not what you're telling me I'm supposed to be implying.
You lose to a bad Meta Knight. Now imagine good Meta Knight players.
If you didn't lose a matchup that's supposedly not bad, it wouldn't be a logical fallacy.
Except I'm definitely not one of the top five Yoshis.
...Unless you're talking top 5 in Canada.
*crickets*
I'm the best Yoshi in Canada. Scientifically proven.
I love you. But the matchup is bad.
Come to Ontario, you'll see what I mean.
It's not impossible. Nothing is impossible, but realistically, Meta Knight has the advantage by a significant amount.