Before the post in question, you had avoided wagoning Riddle but instead nudged it along. Funny how you're not part of the Riddle wagon anymore anyways a whole one post later.Riddle was @ L-2 already with Marshy's vote. Didn't want to put him @ L-1 this early.
Where in that quote have I've been faulting anybody? I even asked the people on the Nick wagon if they think he's more suspicious. I never faulted anybody. Also lol @ the never attempted to wagon Riddle. My vote currently is on Riddle. I am part of the Riddle wagon.
That was my point. You said it didn't sit well with you, but what made you vote was that Nick had more votes than Riddle. You presented no new information about Riddle that made you go from being suspicious of him and not voting him, to being suspicious of him and voting him. What made you put your vote down, was that Nick had more votes than Riddle, regardless of what suspicions you previously had.Yeah because I totally didn't say that Riddle's defense doesn't sit well with me.
Oh, w8!
What brought it to my attention, is that instead of saying "I'm putting Riddle at L-2 right now, are you going to vote me?" you instead use another player as Steel's theoretical target if what you imply about him voting anyone who puts people at L-2 is true.Your point? You just repeated my thoughts on Riddle? And?
Also, I never voted anybody for putting somebody @L-2. I didn't even make a deal out of it. It was part of Steel's reasoning regardless of the other stuff he said. He votes somebody for putting a player @L-2 but doesn't do so for another player. So I asked why? I didn't complain about it. I asked. I hope that's not too much asked.
Yeah, I'm usually fairly quick to rip apart false arguments.
Regardless...Gheb leaves the wagon because too many people agree with a Riddle lynch, but is fine nudging it along. When is L-1 okay Gheb, when is it 'not too early'? Do you think we should wait until the final 24 hours to put Riddle at L-1? What if he presents a claim that is believable at that time? Do we just kneejerk to another player, risk half the players not being on, and end up with a non-majority lynch going through? Drawing out the day to the final hours can be detrimental.Unvote
Still too early imo to put somebody @L-1. Omni, Tom and Nick need to post a lot more, haven't seen anything of substance from them in a while. Omis, didn't you say that putting somebody @L-2 isn't scummy but L-1 is? You just did the same thing jfyi. A lot of the day has been wasted with thee whole "joke" debate, which led nowhere.
I'd rather lynch a coaster/lurker toDay than later. I'm still down for the Riddle lynch if nothing better seems to emerge but I wouldn't mind inactives dead at this point. They can become dangerous later in the game. Cacti lynch sounds solid in my book too.
unvote: vote: Riddle
Riddle, since a large part of the suspicion formed on you from meta...
Riddle, you confirmed an hour before everyone else.
Gheb and Chaco did not confirm in thread at all.
Steel, Omni, Marshy, and Myself all confirmed in a 5 minute period.
What do you think of this?
Your defense has been described as awkward, etc... Originally I wrote it off as a town tell (#85), but looking back it's more of a null tell in my eyes.
#138
Did you notice anything about the section you said you would reread?
Did you have anything from the entire game you've noticed?
You've become very lurk-ish since suspicion built on you, and even got prodded, but still didn't make an attempt to scumhunt from the looks of it. Why?