Proverbs
Smash Lord
Nevermind, stupid post.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No, he actually had a lower score than Fox. Fox had 9.88 and Marth had 9.85....Marth already is top of top tier, Proverbs. He's only below Fox 'cause of the alphabet.
Oh really? Huh. Wonder why they didn't just post that.No, he actually had a lower score than Fox. Fox had 9.88 and Marth had 9.85.
Why did they made F before M? D:<...Marth already is top of top tier, Proverbs. He's only below Fox 'cause of the alphabet.
I don't think anybody disagrees with you that Sheik is the best character as far as most favorable matchups. If characters were evenly distributed across tournaments Sheik would always be the best choice. If the tier list were based upon this hypothetical even distribution of characters then yes, Sheik would be #1.wow @ ppl taking it to heart so much
SBR isn't know-all, they mostly based off tourney results which I think is dumb. I am still very sure that Sheik is the best character, and Fox is overall better than Marth too.
Husband? Ken? Taj lol Husband quit awhile ago. and even then he isn't the most knowledgable marth player. Ken is done with smash for school, and so is taj.There aren't enough good Marth players. I think Marth needs to be played smarter than falco, fox, and sheik at high levels, and his play style is extremely match up based. Marth has the potential to be the best character in the game because of his versatility, but mastering him is harder than mastering the other 3 most used tourney characters. He has the most potential, and has the potential for the most creativity and unpredictability. The only problem is, fox and falco are more successful in tourneys because for the most part, not always, but for the most part, they can be played the same way without adjusting to their match ups, and be more successful than a marth that plays without changing thier style according to matchups. Fox and Falco have less potential to be creative and unpredictable, but marth has more versatility than fox, falco, and sheik. Marth's versatility has only been utilized to the max by a few players, Ken and Azen being among them, and this is the reason Marth was top tier at one point. Since the tier list is based solely on tourney results, and fox and falco are easier to master than Marth (not tech wise, but match up wise) ppl play fox and falco more than marth, and generally do better than marth in tourneys, because Marth is more difficult to be successful with at a high level of play than fox and falco are. For this reason, I've noticed a significant increase in fox and falco's in tourneys, and again because the tier list is based on tourney results, marth is not top tier. He is high tier though, and this is because more ppl play Marth than they play other characters like DK, Ness, Bowser. This is because marth is obviously a better character than everyone else in the tiers below him. This is an extremely unbalanced fighting game. Others may argue that peach is harder to use than marth, and that's why the number of peaches in tourneys have gone down, and that's also why peach has moved down the tier list, but IMO marth is a better character than peach, with more potential.
Summary: A Marth that is successful in high levels of play requires the player to be smarter, more creative, and unpredictable than Fox, Falco and Sheik. For this reason, 1.) Marth's have been played less in recent tourneys, 2.) It's easier to be successful with Fox, Falco and Sheik.
Remember, this is all opinion based on my recent observations and everything i've studied about smash. I'd appreciate it if higher level players put in their two cents and let me know what their opinion on my thoughts are. I'd like to hear from more experienced players, and it would mean a lot to me if I could get some feedback from players like Husband, Cactuar, Frostbyte, UMBC super smasher, b-will...maybe even ken and taj.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=192222I have a question for M2K. Why is Sheik the best character? I'm not disagreeing with you, but I've never been able to get a decent answer on that from anyone else. And that's hearsay anyway. So why is sheik the best? And you comes in second and third? And where is Falco on the M2K tierlist?
pretty close, id say number 2 imoBut he still isn't #1.
At present Marth is considered to have an even matchup against Fox (and Falco) in general. He has a decidedly bad matchup against Sheik, and Falcon and Puff are iffy as to whether they're even or in one or the other's favor. He also has trouble, arguably losing, to several non-high tiers, most notably Pikachu and Yoshi.i thought marth was top tier
I dont think he has any losing matchups other than fox, and most marths are good against foxes as well.
I'd place falco no higher than 3rd place, and possibly as low as 4th, and i would say that marth solidly wins the matchup.
i wouldn't say fox and marth are on equal footing, even on FD, but he's probably the best character against fox out of the whole cast and like i said before, a lot of marths specialize against fox.
as for switching characters, thats not really attributable to matchups. In the end its more to do with which of your characters will win that particular game, not so much the matchup.
at all levels of play, most of melee will be in your head.
Far more problematic in my experience is his lack of a lingering hitboxthe only downsides he has are poor recovery and has trouble killing at higher percents
ok maybe that one other downside but hes at least 3rd on the tier listFar more problematic in my experience is his lack of a lingering hitbox
I agree, at top level he's higher than Falco imook maybe that one other downside but hes at least 3rd on the tier list
yeh id say 2ndI agree, at top level he's higher than Falco imo
Nah. His sword is too short.Far more problematic in my experience is his lack of a lingering hitbox
Yeah i really ****ed upFew people posting in this thread seem to realize this debate was from 2007.