Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Project M is non-profit. Mods are completely legal, because you need Brawl to load it. You have a serious misconception about how smash mods work.The one that edits copyrighted material and hosting it for money, is less illegal than ones that don't?.
Technically there are a lot of things you can do that are non profit but can still get you in trouble for doing, copying and distributing music for example. Nintendo doesn't care as much but I don't think some companies want to take that chance.Project M is non-profit. Mods are completely legal, because you need Brawl to load it. You have a serious misconception about how smash mods work.
Then why are people playing Brawl and Marvel 3?I will post only once. Brawl+ is unfinised. Why play an unfinished game competitively?
It's very applicable when copyright can be an issue.An example of something that isn't applicable.
By not including copyrighted music, a mod doesn't infringe on copyrighted music.It's very applicable when copyright can be an issue.
Good luck getting a company like MLG to think like that.It isn't an issue because Nintendo won't take action.
Do you think I'm talking about Music being the issue and not a comparison?By not including copyrighted music, a mod doesn't infringe on copyrighted music.
Modders can refrain from distributing said music in their mods, as most of the Brawl 'codesets' already do. So no, your example is not applicable in the slightest. Not. At. All.
Then why are you stubbornly disagreeing with so many other posters?While I'm not very well versed in copyright laws,
While it's not bad they are doing it, getting picked is a goal of our community and pushing a hack as the main attraction or set standard is not gonna work too well. People can play what they want, that is true. There are issues, even if Nintendo is question don't have a problem. The people who might want to make Smash of any sort apart of their curcuit might.Relax man, it is only an issue if the mod http://kotaku.com/5585802/nintendo-doesnt-want-to-criminalize-obsessed-fans in question socially diminishes the dignity or value of their IP, according to Nintendo. Project M is doing the exact opposite.
When you get down to brass tacks, Brawl's scene is much smaller than Melee's was at this time in its life. Not that there are less people playing it or talking about it, just less of a dedicated community pushing the core game. Brawl+ never made it because it did not set out to make the game many competitive players hoped Brawl would be. Project M, on the other hand, stands a better chance.
Normal Brawl's future as the sole standard depends more on its own legs than anything else. Ultimately the type of players that this topic concerns will play which version they want to play. At that point, if the community can support both, it will. Also who cares if MLG recognizes it, all that really matters is we do.
Because I am pointing out the issues that can come up.Then why are you stubbornly disagreeing with so many other posters?
when people start taking a game like that seriously it becomes 100-0 matchups across the board once the metagame starts to develop.I personally think brawl- is more balanced as anyone can win. I'm not trying to troll btw.
Melee has been fine for over 4 years without a huge company backing it. next?Good luck getting a company like MLG to think like that.
No, it's actually kind of balanced like BBrawl. Difficulty wise it's about right on with Smash 64.when people start taking a game like that seriously it becomes 100-0 matchups across the board once the metagame starts to develop.
besides it's like... melee's 0 deaths with brawl's difficulty.
Not that it matters anyways but MLG dropped Brawl, one of the reasons being unsteady attendance figures. It all goes back to the point I was making earlier, Brawl doesn't have the numbers Melee had at this point in it's life, which in comparison was picked up by EVO.While we don't need MLG, we still would want their support one way or another.
no more arguing needed.only balance problem is MK. only camping problem is MK. and the game is fine on depth.
So has Brawl, we would be better with it.Melee has been fine for over 4 years without a huge company backing it. next?
No, lol.only balance problem is MK. only camping problem is MK. and the game is fine on depth.
No major company will back Brawl, it's a terrible high-level competitive game and an even worse spectator e-sport.So has Brawl, we would be better with it.
Around half the cast shows up at nationals in the top 16 or so in the past year, though not as frequently, even with MK. That's a lot better than MvC2, 3rd Strike, and other games.No, lol.
MLG did.No major company will back Brawl, it's a terrible high-level competitive game and an even worse spectator e-sport.
I wouldn't mind if you would elaborate on that point.It's too easy.