Aligo
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2021
- Messages
- 535
Sure the instruments are better, but it doesn't really fit Splatoon or the inklings very well, at least in my opinion.The Splattack remix from Ultimate is better than the original version
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sure the instruments are better, but it doesn't really fit Splatoon or the inklings very well, at least in my opinion.The Splattack remix from Ultimate is better than the original version
In fairness, Mother 3's stage choice does delve into its darker aspects; it's just not immediately apparent to those who didn't play it. New Pork City itself is symbolic of the introduction of capitalism leading to the inevitable rise of fascism, which itself was a key part of Mother 3's storytelling. So the use of the Pigmask insignia, the inclusion of a song titled "Isn't This Such a Utopia?", and making most of the city cardboard just like the source game helps reflect the superficial commercialism with something sinister waiting beneath (as exemplified by the inclusion of the Ultimate Chimera, a warped creature of nature twisted by a capitalistic and fascistic regime).While it's something a lot of people complain about, I personally really appreciate how Smash's EarthBound rep greatly prioritizes the surrealism and parody-Americana over the dark spooky side - those elements are way more memorable to me. Smash also has a nasty habit of taming comedy-based franchises - which includes EB - so it's nice that the series' representation can at least show a bit of the sillier side of the games.
Not to mention that Mother 3 specifically's darker side would be impossible to represent more than it is without plunging into horrifically bad taste - hell, Lucas' Masked Man alt costume already feels a bit like a step too far.
Yeah, that last point is what I was referring to - the Masked Man, Porky's backstory, that sort of thing (seriously, if you can't make a moveset for a potential Smash character without referencing corporal punishment, they're probably not a very wise inclusion) - there's nothing particularly in-bad-taste about how New Pork City is handled in Smash or even the Porky boss fight in Brawl even with context of M3, hence why I said "more than it is", though M3's representation does become a little bit awkward - albeit in a funny way rather than an offensive one - now that the likes of Microsoft and Disney are involved.In fairness, Mother 3's stage choice does delve into its darker aspects; it's just not immediately apparent to those who didn't play it. New Pork City itself is symbolic of the introduction of capitalism leading to the inevitable rise of fascism, which itself was a key part of Mother 3's storytelling. So the use of the Pigmask insignia, the inclusion of a song titled "Isn't This Such a Utopia?", and making most of the city cardboard just like the source game helps reflect the superficial commercialism with something sinister waiting beneath (as exemplified by the inclusion of the Ultimate Chimera, a warped creature of nature twisted by a capitalistic and fascistic regime).
It just doesn't delve into the more personal tragedies, understandably.
Yeah, that last bit is kind of the concession that has to be taken when the copyrights for decidedly anti-capitalist stories are owned by mega corporations lol. Even Nintendo themselves aren't immune in that regard, especially with the whole "we will actively ruin someone's life to the fullest extent of the law for running a ROM download site" **** they pulled recently. Though I do suppose it's a small victory that they can't do anything with the Mother/Earthbound IP without Itoi's permission since he owns half the copyright himself. So that's a partial win for Creator's Rights.Yeah, that last point is what I was referring to - the Masked Man, Porky's backstory, that sort of thing (seriously, if you can't make a moveset for a potential Smash character without referencing corporal punishment, they're probably not a very wise inclusion) - there's nothing particularly in-bad-taste about how New Pork City is handled in Smash or even the Porky boss fight in Brawl even with context of M3, hence why I said "more than it is", though M3's representation does become a little bit awkward - albeit in a funny way rather than an offensive one - now that the likes of Microsoft and Disney are involved.
Nux said it a while back but it remains relevant. The Smash Bros fandom isnt a toxic fandom, it's an ungrateful fandom.I know Smash is never above criticism, but I’m genuinely tired of all the negativity surrounding it.
Honestly, the "be grateful" crowd is to blame for a lot of the toxicity in the fandom IMO. Why should I be grateful for a game that added very little in the way of content I care about, plays worse than others in the genre, and I generally got tired of year 1?Nux said it a while back but it remains relevant. The Smash Bros fandom isnt a toxic fandom, it's an ungrateful fandom.
While I'm on the subject...
I dont listen to people who say they want a reboot of Smash Bros. Why would you reinvent the wheel after the wheel became the single best selling fighting game in history. Especially if you're trying to make a similar type of wheel. If they really want to reboot Smash Bros. They should go from a 2D Platform Fighter to a 3D Platform Fighter.
Nux said it a while back but it remains relevant. The Smash Bros fandom isnt a toxic fandom, it's an ungrateful fandom.
Why fight over which is worse? Because...Honestly, the "be grateful" crowd is to blame for a lot of the toxicity in the fandom IMO.
Centrism's all well and good [it's not actually, but that's a discussion for another time], but I don't really see how both sides can be equally blamed here? The worst the "ungrateful" crowd did was not like a game, maybe be a little annoying about it, but not to the degree of actively chastising people for not being satisfied with a $60 product made by a company that doesn't love you back. One side is necessarily obnoxious, the other only is in a handful of edge cases.Why fight over which is worse? Because...
Nah, I still see certain people who want their Melee-like Smash game accuse fans of later games of being "casuals", which is still definitely shaming.Centrism's all well and good [it's not actually, but that's a discussion for another time], but I don't really see how both sides can be equally blamed here? The worst the "ungrateful" crowd did was not like a game, maybe be a little annoying about it, but not to the degree of actively shaming people for not being satisfied with a $60 product made by a company that doesn't love you back. One side is necessarily obnoxious, the other only is in a handful of edge cases.
Eh, you're not wrong.Why fight over which is worse? Because...
I'm just wary of people barging into discussions to call both sides stupid and contribute nothing. It's something you see way too often on the internet and the past few years of Paper Mario discourse put me off from that sort of attitude pretty thoroughly.Are people actually arguing over which one is more obnoxious?
We could just not... be obnoxious. At all.
Anecdotal accusations of one side being more obnoxious is worth nothing. This is a stupid conversation that will not end well. I suggest we move on.
I really get the sense that in 90% of internet debates if you're "grateful", you're an mindless apologist, and if you criticize, you're "ungrateful".Even in the best game of all times, there is absolutely nothing to be "grateful" for.
Wait hang on- I’ll maybe watch the video later but TotK not living up to the legacy of the franchise sounds like a perfectly reasonable complaint. I don’t agree but considering the flaws with most of the story and dungeons generally being weaker I think that’s a reasonable position to hold.I really get the sense that in 90% of internet debates if you're "grateful", you're an mindless apologist, and if you criticize, you're "ungrateful".
And not only the debaters feel negatively about the opposing side, but you get exaggerated BS like this that claims TotK fails to live up to the legacy of its franchise. So unilateral gratefulness and unilateral criticism is both encouraged and discouraged.
Yes, I think it is a bit crazy to be "grateful" for a product that you buy. Even if it is a great product and/or a great piece of art, it wasn't made for your sake out of kindness.I really get the sense that in 90% of internet debates if you're "grateful", you're an mindless apologist, and if you criticize, you're "ungrateful".
And not only the debaters feel negatively about the opposing side, but you get exaggerated BS like this that claims TotK fails to live up to the legacy of its franchise. So unilateral gratefulness and unilateral criticism is both encouraged and discouraged.
I mean, that's basically the mentality that's made Pokemon discourse insufferable for the past several years. Even then, I wouldn't shame both sides since the brunt of the aggression's clearly coming from one side. That's how most fandom camp wars are IMO.I really get the sense that in 90% of internet debates if you're "grateful", you're an mindless apologist, and if you criticize, you're "ungrateful".
Don't get me wrong, unilateral gratefulness is a load of trash since it inevitably leads to NSMB/Pokemon-level stagnation. I believe that's what you mean by "gratefulness", though you may correct me.Yes, I think it is a bit crazy to be "grateful" for a product that you buy. Even if it is a great product and/or a great piece of art, it wasn't made for your sake out of kindness.
It may start from one side, but in the end, it always seems to devolve into one giant urinating contest where aggression and condescension are casually thrown around to the point where it doesn't really matter who started it anymore. And it isn't even a fight over something worth knowing who started it like some war to end a dictatorship or to free slaves.Even then, I wouldn't shame both sides since the brunt of the aggression's clearly coming from one side. That's how most fandom camp wars are IMO.
that’s because it’s not logical it’s “hey I like this guy”I don't understand the logic behind maining a character just because you like their source material and not because their gameplay suits you.
Don't forget the bootlegs like the ones that use an original code or the many romhacks where Mario is slapped in.I posted a profile post about this ages ago, but I may as well post it here as well:
I'd love to see Smash include content related to regrettable or embarassing parts of Nintendo history - edgy 90s and 2000s adverts, cheesy cartoon and anime adaptations, the CD-i Mario/Zelda and PC Mario/Pokémon games, a Mortal Kombat fighter having some kind of sweat-related gag, the Genesis Does What Nintendon't jingle as a music track, stuff like that. Hell, add the Game Genie genie mascot as a fighter while you're at it!
Maybe it's just a matter of definition.Don't get me wrong, unilateral gratefulness is a load of trash since it inevitably leads to NSMB/Pokemon-level stagnation. I believe that's what you mean by "gratefulness", though you may correct me.
I'm just saying: I'd prefer to be grateful for certain aspects and also still free to criticize others. Sometimes both on certain aspects at the same time.
It may start from one side, but in the end, it always seems to devolve into one giant urinating contest where aggression and condescension are casually thrown around to the point where it doesn't really matter who started it anymore. And it isn't even a fight over something worth knowing who started it like some war to end a dictatorship or to free slaves.
Yeah, Pokémon discourse is insufferable. So is that of Zelda, and yes Smash. But IMO, it would be much less so if we collectively knew who starts everything and just make it stop there.
Precisely. I'm "grateful" when someone does something for me personally expecting nothing in return, not when a multibillion dollar corporation sells me a game for 60 bucks.Maybe it's just a matter of definition.
I'm grateful when a friend invites me to his place and cooks for me. I'm grateful when someone I know sends me a postcard during a travel, letting me know that he thinks of me while abroad. I'm grateful when a stranger gives me the directions I need when I am lost. In a word, I'm grateful when someone is nice to me, genuinely nice, whith no after thought. If I was a religious or spiritual person, I guess I could be grateful to God or to the world when I have had a nice day.
When I find something amazing in a game, or a book or a movie, I can feel impressed, amazed. I can admire the ideas, the hard work, the genius behind a feature. But I wouldn't call that gratefulness.
For me, gratefulness can only be experienced when something is being offered to you personally. If it is impersonal, or if there is an idea behind the gesture (like getting your vote or your money), then when should use other words, because it's a different feeling.
Usually , i would agree with you. However I definitely would make an exception for the next smash game if i got my most wanteds ; being , Ahri & Master Chief.Precisely. I'm "grateful" when someone does something for me personally expecting nothing in return, not when a multibillion dollar corporation sells me a game for 60 bucks.
It almost never works either as interesting. Though I can see it fit sometimes; "MegaMan.EXE Jacks in!" for instance.The laziest character taglines are the ones that go "(Character) (Verb)s in!"
Things like "Little Mac Punches In!" or "Wii Fit Trainer Weighs In!" or "Chibi-Robo Plugs In!"? Those work, because they're puns that fit the character.It almost never works either as interesting. Though I can see it fit sometimes; "MegaMan.EXE Jacks in!" for instance.
But yeah, it gets boring fast. Sometimes it's fine, but still. I like the variety~
I'll give credit for Alex(do you mean Steve's swap, or a different fan concept?) if it's referring to Minecraft. This at least fits the idea of being a palette swap and the skins thing has some history in Minecraft. Steve, the default skin, didn't have a name till way later on, by the fans no less. So Alex, the core female skin, doing that feels a bit more pleasing just because of the history of the Minecraft skins. Unfortunately it's not the first thing many think of, so it's not as easily neat to fans in general.Things like "Little Mac Punches In!" or "Wii Fit Trainer Weighs In!" or "Chibi-Robo Plugs In!"? Those work, because they're puns that fit the character.
Something like "Tails Flies In!" or "Alex Swaps In!" Those could use some work
I was referring to Alex from Minecraft, yes. And I will admit it's better than I gave it credit for. At least, it's better than "Zombie Spawns In!"I'll give credit for Alex(do you mean Steve's swap, or a different fan concept?) if it's referring to Minecraft. This at least fits the idea of being a palette swap and the skins thing has some history in Minecraft. Steve, the default skin, didn't have a name till way later on, by the fans no less. So Alex, the core female skin, doing that feels a bit more pleasing just because of the history of the Minecraft skins. Unfortunately it's not the first thing many think of, so it's not as easily neat to fans in general.
It's still a bit boring, but it does make sense. ...Tails, yeah, that's super boring. He's not just a flier. He's the Luigi of the Sonic series. He's a Gadgeteer Genius(though not as smart as Eggman, still a pretty good rival to him), etc.
Hell, I'm still trying to figure out some fun ones for my most wanted, without them being boring like you said. X.X