I'm certainly glad fans are more accepting of 3rd party characters in Smash now, because during the days leading up to Wii U it was an entirely different story.
Like, Snake was explained away because "He was too violent", and characters like Professor Layton, Shovel Knight, and Shantae were considered big picks. Now, I'm not going to just **** on people's favorite picks. All I would say is that there is a
clear difference between all three of those characters, and even somebody like Joker.
Every single pick, Bayonetta included, has drawn in a new audience to Smash regardless of what the history of each respective series has been.
Honestly it's sad as those people refuse to try out legitimately great stuff because of a rather small label.
Also the OP is a goddamn idiot and says Doomguy, who's franchise has been on Nintendo for a long *** time, wasn't Nintendo enough and it's ironic that people there would be fine with Banjo Kazooie because they're owned by a rival in the industry. Also some people go "Snake has Nintendo significance because the first Metal Gear was on the NES!" when it wasn't the first Metal Gear game
Exactly. Why should it matter when Snake debuted on a Nintendo console when Metal Gear Solid is...Metal Gear Solid, and he provides a fun and unique moveset?
In addition, while I think Doomguy would be probably fun it's certainly
not gaming history that keeps him out if you ask me. It's the fact that Doomguy brings with him, most likely a stage that would literally be titled "Hell", because that's where he goes in his games. It might sound ridiculous, maybe, but that's moreso why I could see a potential Bethesda pick explore other options like Skyrim (which also arguably has gaming history) or Fallout. Probably Elder Scrolls though.
Doesn't mean he doesn't have gaming history, nor that he wouldn't be a good pick. I can just see reasoning as to why he wouldn't be in.
O h
b o y
h e r e
w e
g o.
As much as I don't like the idea of DLC being all 3rd party, I do think that having 3rd parties in Smash, regardless of their relationship w/ Nintendo, was a great choice.
Having characters that expand beyond Nintendo's usual market helps bring in people that typically would be interested in Smash.
That's precisely the point of 3rd parties at this point, so I'm in complete agreement with you.
Basically, do I think it's going to be weird knowing that Smash Ultimate didn't completely cap off the DK series because of the lack of Dixie Kong? Maybe. But I also understand why she wouldn't be picked, because her taking a DLC spot does nothing to expand the audience, and nothing to expand the Smash Universe.
It makes complete sense as to why entirely 3rd party works.