VA
Smash Hero
I don't agree with Charles's attitude, it's typically scrubbish sometimes. Thinking it's way above it's actual standing. I know I'm a good smasher but I'm not going to claim I can beat Armada yet.
If you watch back the videos of me vs Charles you can see which of us was making more errors and which one didn't really know what was going on. If you watch me or prof vs Edwin you'll see us both adapting and ****** him. Edwin really didn't know what to do against my Peach in the 3rd match and you can see it.
Charles has the wrong attitude, he ranks people by how well they do against him. i.e. Edwin can beat him in friendlies therefore edwin is the best other than him.
To me it indicates a lack of understanding of Melee. Charles has demonstrated a few times that his knowledge of the game falls short of mine and many others in the community but he still knows how to win and is a very confident and clutch player. His tech skill is fluid and he doesn't **** up or fall for things easily, it's how he beat Adam I assume. Just went about his business.
Prof understands the game better than Charles, not perfectly but still to a high degree, probably sees a lot that I don't. I understand the mechanics of melee to a very high level and I also understand options in a way that I believe most of the UK smashers don't even know about. Smash is more than just a game, the option approach is the way you must view the game to be successful and until you can analyse your every movement you won't be reaching the pinnacle.
IMHO its only a matter of time until my tournament play is consistent enough to do justice to my real skill, we'll see how things turn out then. I believe that Prof has more global potential than Charles until Charles can adjust his attitude. The problem behind this lies in that if Charles changes his attitude he'll be less confident, a vital part in his 3 years of UK dominance.
Also: Peach is not my best character xD
EDIT: Charles don't get upset by this. Don't take it personally as it just what I think about your smash attitude, not your personality!!!
If you watch back the videos of me vs Charles you can see which of us was making more errors and which one didn't really know what was going on. If you watch me or prof vs Edwin you'll see us both adapting and ****** him. Edwin really didn't know what to do against my Peach in the 3rd match and you can see it.
Charles has the wrong attitude, he ranks people by how well they do against him. i.e. Edwin can beat him in friendlies therefore edwin is the best other than him.
To me it indicates a lack of understanding of Melee. Charles has demonstrated a few times that his knowledge of the game falls short of mine and many others in the community but he still knows how to win and is a very confident and clutch player. His tech skill is fluid and he doesn't **** up or fall for things easily, it's how he beat Adam I assume. Just went about his business.
Prof understands the game better than Charles, not perfectly but still to a high degree, probably sees a lot that I don't. I understand the mechanics of melee to a very high level and I also understand options in a way that I believe most of the UK smashers don't even know about. Smash is more than just a game, the option approach is the way you must view the game to be successful and until you can analyse your every movement you won't be reaching the pinnacle.
IMHO its only a matter of time until my tournament play is consistent enough to do justice to my real skill, we'll see how things turn out then. I believe that Prof has more global potential than Charles until Charles can adjust his attitude. The problem behind this lies in that if Charles changes his attitude he'll be less confident, a vital part in his 3 years of UK dominance.
Also: Peach is not my best character xD
EDIT: Charles don't get upset by this. Don't take it personally as it just what I think about your smash attitude, not your personality!!!