Yeah agree with the last paragraph fully.
Couple things I think should be mentioned lol, think this is a good thread to do it:
-It would be really nice when setting up commentary for matches to do it out of the participating players earshot. I didn't mention it at the time cause it was of no use but it was very distracting at SHS
![Laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.gif)
. I also know other players have complained about it.
-Joe should do commentary again. I was looking back at those vids of GGT2 and hes right for the part. Ben your commentary was inconsistent, you didnt analyse the games much. You made a couple amusing comments/anecdotes , but you generally said generic things on the matches. The SHS vids sound like they were recorded in a library
![Urg :urg: :urg:]()
.
Ed regarding the questionnaires I'll either talk to you about them on msn or PM lol.
I think the two things holding the UK back can be summed up in two categories:
Attitude and Geographical Circumstances.
Somehow the UK scene is prone to stagnation. This is such a complex issue which is why I dont want to go very in-depth with it. The possible reasons I believe:
-We are prone to put our best players on pedestals and the best players prone to a lack of ambition(why this is Im not sure yet)
-The general social pressure of our scene. You get people everywhere on the boards who say if you practice a video game a lot you have no life(and imply that its bad etc.)- but usually not half of an active video game scene in itself
![Laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.gif)
Even Professor Pro whos technical ability visibly shows that hes put several hours in to the game has felt obliged on several occasions to put down other players for their activity in the community(!!) and mention that he has a girlfriend etc.
-UK players love flashiness in exchange for clinical, consistent gameplay- which is deemed as gay, cheap etc., stunting the growth of their game and creating barriers. Essentially, on a wide scale, UK players don't practice properly. Improvement at the game is misunderstood.
-we have less able hosts for smashfests and tournies than other countries
-Talented UK players outside London are in awkward locations limiting their progress. Notice when 2 or more players are very close by in the UK, they usually play very frequently- Old Mafia would play 2-3 times a week for hours on end. I used to play Davemans 2 times a week and I now play Looman 3 times a week, Ed and Phil would play once or twice a week, Robby and Swizzy play frequently for long hours, Jam and Craiigg play frequently for long hours. Joe and Will played often.
However playing one or two people frequently will only develop certain skills and often put you into bad habits, and often with no final result in sight for your hard work due to lack of UK tournies- and you probably can't host one yourself because of work/student/effort constraints. Its also very hard to get your friends into the game once you're at a decent level, because few people like getting beaten about all day, those that do will have usually shown the initiative and looked up their hobbys community online. For over a year Mafias main hub for smashfests was my house and I had to limit its usage because my family live there. If one of us had a useable flat then we may have practiced a lot more and improved a lot quicker. Or if we lived 2 hours between each other as opposed to 3. Small factors like that can make a huge difference.
As a side point, this perhaps not being as conclusive as the other points- I also believe that Doug leaving the scene wasn't a necessarily good thing. He was an already established, very experienced player who had a lot of wisdom about the game and who played very methodically. He was like my guide to improving but at the same time my goal was to defeat him and it motivated me greatly, and the same went for Charles and Jam. Once Doug left, me and Charles dominated somewhat for a while and there was very speedy improvement and medium placings in European tournaments. Then our egos over-inflated and we started talking stuff about the game we didn't know, spreading a bad influence to new players- a result of the pedestal effect. The UK would probably be better if a top 10 player in America didnt win every tournament for 3 years uncontested, but I don't think that made his leaving the community a good thing for the scene around at the time.
Charles hasn't gotten out of the medium placings, holding his ground but it goes to show a lack of improvement in the whole of the UK if he wins every tournament. Also, watch Zhu vs M2K (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6eqa850P1I ) then watch the vids from SHS. We simply do not compare. The reason I cite a top-of-the-metagame match is to emphasise the gulf, and with Armada doing so well at Genesis it has shown that the top Euro players can compete. Nonetheless, heres a Zgetto vs Amsah match for good measure-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JxhoN56J4E With those factors I think 13th makes more sense as a placing :-/. No offence to Charles intended.
Thats what I can think of at the moment, Im sure theres much more and I've probably made a couple mistakes. I think with definite data it would be much easier to find the errors of the scene or define them better.