To the first point, we cannot win the game without lynching. If we focused on finding a lynch, the worst that would happen? We aim for a townie and they stump, and we're in the same place as we would be if we had focused on a stump to begin with, without needing the time to build up votes if they refuse to stump due to being scum. Either focus ends up with either townie stump or mafia lynch. Really neither is highly advantageous, both having their ups and downs, but given the fact that it is not a mylo/lylo situation yet, neither presents any major advantage or disadvantage, and neither has any more risk. Also, I have since said since my consideration of lynch focusing the very thing that neither is highly advantageous with the deadline drawing near enough that we'll have to decide what to do about a lynch before long.About Mentos:
He agrees with stumping replacing lynching. However, he considers the possibility of lynching, at all. That's no good. Stump only is obviously better than anything else. There is nothing to consider. He should know better, in the same way that Brockin should have known the benefits of posting logs. However, unlike Brockin, he saw the benefit of logs, which makes me believe he must be able to see the benefit of stumping only. I am as sure of this as I was of Brockin, but you should be able to see the difference.
He focuses on numbers and rules rather than motives.
Spoke as though he was absolutely sure I was town, yet he still wanted me, his strongest town read, to stump. Not just desired, but based his whole early play around ensuring that it would occur.
His reasoning for questioning Brockin was bad, and cannot be corroborated at any rate. I think he just did it so he wouldn't be accused of parroting.
The second line I'm not sure I entirely understand.
The third section, I believe I explained. Yes, you were my strongest town read. However, you had also made a deal with Heatstroke and not followed through. Every post you made not doing so slowly chipped away at the townie feel I had of you, and had you not stumped, whether it was the next day or later, I would have begun to consider having read you wrong and that you may be scum. Not to mention, at the time, if I was right you were town, I was one of very few who backed you at all. The majority of the town thought you scum immediately, and the focus would have been too much on you and not enough on people I thought would have a chance to flip scum.
The final section, no my questioning of Brockin was not superfluos. If he had still said that he wouldn't post the logs despite what had happened since the origin of the issue, it would have actually leaned me more to the town side, and I wouldn't have wanted to stump him as early. At that point,as scum, they would have had absolutely no threat saying "oh yeah, I understand now, I would have posted them," but much higher threat to say "Even if the town all wanted it, and having the benefits clearly spelled out, I wouldn't post them." Rockin, and I believe Swords, are both intelligent enough to realize this as scum, and would go with the lesser risk. Standing by an action that was considered scummy by half the town looks completely different than changing your opinion once it no longer makes a difference.