memphischains
Smash hhkj'
overswarm is cute
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Does MK have any matchups where he is at a slight disadvantage, like sheik vs spacies in melee?I know people go way overboard, I think it's ridiculous that MK should be banned, there's plenty of characters I would rather fight. He's just like Fox or Sheik in melee, just really good/well-rounded overall. (Sheik vs spacies is 45/55 and sheik vs ICs is around even too)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC8HGKkXEx4
this was one of the only times I ever did that match in my life but I seemed to do just fine, even if you don't count the SDs and on ICs best stage. If ICs grab you you get wobbled anyway, and fast fallers (especailly falcon) are dead regardless. Sheik does fine vs ICs, I think she has the advantage 60/40. So yes, I would say MK is the same as Sheik
i have to say these tips were really good,
untill the 3rd time i tried to do anything, and than they learned the counter tactic, and immediately countered it
These two posts..mmhmm.Hence why you have to be smarter than your opponents to actually stand a chance at beating them. You can't seriously expect spoon feeding to do that much for you.
This thread needs to be cleaned.
Way. To. Fail.metaknight isn't that bad, stop b!tching learn the match, here's what you do...you play with him and see how he's able to get punished from the lag of certain moves if you just play smart, yeah i know you can get gimped fast but at the same time you can kill him at like 100% solid cuz he's light play smart and try to beat him by percentage not by gimps.
Trufax!!!!tl;dr Don't Make Mistakes And Hope The Mk Player Does.
yeah.. kinda truetl;dr Don't make mistakes and hope the MK player does.
You said this is a terrible argument, but you didn't say why?Way. To. Fail.
STOP USING THIS ARGUMENT. It doesn't work. This is a terrible, terrible, terrible, argument.
He's right though. In order to win against Meta Knight, you have the pray on his light weight and kill him, rather than gimp him. You need to punish the lag on specific moves, particularly through shields. His attacks all have such low shield stun that hitting him out of attacks is very easy, depending upon the attack. DI properly so he doesn't gimp you. If you follow the basics required to combat Meta Knight, it's much easier to win.Way. To. Fail.
STOP USING THIS ARGUMENT. It doesn't work. This is a terrible, terrible, terrible, argument.
In debates, usually "you suck" is an inadequate response to a given argument.You said this is a terrible argument, but you didn't say why?
Here is why the argument fails... Of course you can learn the matchup but a MK player is just as capable of learning how you play. MK also in all likelyhood has more options than most characters in many situations due to high speed, high priority, and low lag. You can punish some moves but overall you will have way fewer opportunities to punish MK than any other character. MK's inability to get gimped is another fairly large advantage. (Especially if you try to play him with a light character). The point is that MK, while not unbeatable, will have a significant advantage over almost every character, and a moderate advantage over others. The only way to beat MK is to be the better player... But if you are on equal footing to your opponent in terms of skill you'll have a tough time.metaknight isn't that bad, stop b!tching learn the match, here's what you do...you play with him and see how he's able to get punished from the lag of certain moves if you just play smart, yeah i know you can get gimped fast but at the same time you can kill him at like 100% solid cuz he's light play smart and try to beat him by percentage not by gimps.
LOL wow you can be really dumb sometimes.You don't think that's a little bold of you to state "you only lose to good MK's" when you haven't even been out of your area? Inui is a good player? Nah, no he's not. Why do you think so.. because he beats you with MK? Or because he beats Atomsk with MK? That doesn't make him a good player. He's a bad player using a broken character. And - further note, I am not amazing, I lose to bad MK's (Plank is a bad MK imo). When considering how BROKEN MK -ACTUALLY- is, you should NOT use the term 'good' as loosely as you are. Inui is not a good player, his performance with Marth/Snake should show you that much. I'm allowed to have an opinion, and in my opinion most Metaknights aren't actually good... they're just Metaknights.
I don't have much authority but in theory, if MK knows the matchup as well as you do, he should always win. He should be able to counter your counter tactics, knowing that they will come. I suspect the only reason MK doesn't always dominate is EVERYONE knows their MK matchup, but no MK can know EVERY matchup (except for the best, of course).Personally until I see someone that I feel isn't near me do way better against me with meta as opposed to any of their other characters that I consider decent characters, I'm not convinced the lil guy is broken. He's kinda really good, but he doesn't break characters the way dedede and ics have the potential to... XD. He is tampering with the tournament scene with all the fuss he's creating though.
Metaknight makes you have to be good at brawl in order to fight against him, and you also have to know how to punish his attacks... which M2k kinda describes there. I'm sure he knows some very simple mix-ups that counter those counters but the counters he's listed are very simple once you've practiced them and kind of own baby metas if you think out your approach and counter tactics.
He imo has very prominent windows in which you can stage your punishments once you get used to it. I could be completely wrong though and just haven't faced the right metaknights. <3.
how would you know that? the top metaknights are saying that, at a high level of play, metaknight does have neutrals (m2k lists snake in this thread). so why should i believe some random over the people who actually know the character?I don't have much authority but in theory, if MK knows the matchup as well as you do, he should always win. He should be able to counter your counter tactics, knowing that they will come. I suspect the only reason MK doesn't always dominate is EVERYONE knows their MK matchup, but no MK can know EVERY matchup (except for the best, of course).
congratulations, you found a video of a bad matchupSethlon is an amazing Falco, obv.
Watch his matches against this MK called DMK, who I've had to play myself. For example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8xzjv3uzvU&feature=related
Three moves is all it takes. Obv the good people can still beat him but not easily, and can lose to him as well. If there was no MK, I'd never see DMK beat anyone good on such a consistent basis. But since MK does exist, he does. Seriously..."it's not fair".