Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm sorry, but do you think before you post? Snake has some legitimately bad matchups, unlike MK. Snake is a great character, but will never be considered broken. This isn't April '08.The same, then everyone will say Snake is broken.
I'm with you on that one. Marth goes pretty even with almost everyone.I think Marth would get in the top 3 of the tier list.
This post couldn't be better worded and correct.The shifts would be that the characters that give Snake bad match ups are suddenly not getting wrecked by MK. Thus you see more Falcos, D3s, Olimars, and even Pikachus entering into the vs Snake match up. Due to the increase of D3s, you'll have more Falcos/Olimars, and then characters to counter then would rise. Marth would also find himself getting a playstyle boost, but he'd find himself having a bit more trouble against the hordes of D3s since he cannot operate above D3's grab like MK can.
The counter picking aspects of the game would become drastically more used. I bet that most matches would start off with double blind picks to avoid bad match ups that would occur even within the best characters of the game. Snake actually benefits the MOST out of all the characters for MK not being banned since MK has a knack for defeating many of the characters that have match ups that tilt in their favor vs Snake. Without MK to protect him from D3s, Snake would falter. While Marth, a character that has his worst match up in MK would rise quickly.
Snake, Diddy, Wario, Marth, ROB, Toonlink, Pit?, OlimarI'm with you on that one. Marth goes pretty even with almost everyone.
Question, who's worst MU is MK, though?
so, without Mk we'd get a complex top-level game with a web of matchups...The shifts would be that the characters that give Snake bad match ups are suddenly not getting wrecked by MK. Thus you see more Falcos, D3s, Olimars, and even Pikachus entering into the vs Snake match up. Due to the increase of D3s, you'll have more Falcos/Olimars, and then characters to counter then would rise. Marth would also find himself getting a playstyle boost, but he'd find himself having a bit more trouble against the hordes of D3s since he cannot operate above D3's grab like MK can.
The counter picking aspects of the game would become drastically more used. I bet that most matches would start off with double blind picks to avoid bad match ups that would occur even within the best characters of the game. Snake actually benefits the MOST out of all the characters for MK not being banned since MK has a knack for defeating many of the characters that have match ups that tilt in their favor vs Snake. Without MK to protect him from D3s, Snake would falter. While Marth, a character that has his worst match up in MK would rise quickly.
Pretty much. The MK Mafia is too good.
Since you posted, who would you play as, if MK were to be banned? I've seen you use Marth and DDD, at Nope's, when we did the side tourney, but that was just a side event, for fun.snake diddy wario... no no no, they all do quite well against him
QFT.stop being cool Ran.
I think marth could be the best character. No joke. Besides mk (and snake is debatable), his only bad matchup is like....DDD or soemthing. He even/beats the rest of the cast i'm pretty sure....
DDD would see more usage because mk is gone and snake/marth would do better, but then alot falcos/olimars could probably show up to deal with that too like ran said....**** would be interesting AND BALANCED COUGH COUGH
yeah, too bad we're stuck with him.Brawl would be so cool without MetaKnight. So many more characters would be tournament-viable.
problem is that GW and Marth give him lots of trouble still, but even with them he has no "terrible" match-upswell the way my friend play yoshi its pretty darn good soo i think yoshi would be on the top if you want to see why see how miamisportsfan45 does his majic with yoshi
Marth is 45-55 with Snake. Bad against Ice climbers. He gets beat by Mk and D3. He also goes even with Wolf or slight disadvantage.stop being cool Ran.
I think marth could be the best character. No joke. Besides mk (and snake is debatable), his only bad matchup is like....DDD or soemthing. He even/beats the rest of the cast i'm pretty sure....
DDD would see more usage because mk is gone and snake/marth would do better, but then alot falcos/olimars could probably show up to deal with that too like ran said....**** would be interesting AND BALANCED COUGH COUGH
Yoshi loses to like everyone except Ganon,Jiggz, and Falcon.well the way my friend play yoshi its pretty darn good soo i think yoshi would be on the top if you want to see why see how miamisportsfan45 does his majic with yoshi
Fixed.snake diddy wario... no no no, they all do quite well camping against him till he ***** them with his infinite approaches
That's debatable, but we all know it's pretty darn close to even right now.Marth is 45-55 with Snake. Bad against Ice climbers. He gets beat by Mk and D3. He also goes even with Wolf or slight disadvantage.
Since when does PT do well vs MKya i would say Ice Climbers, Snake, and Marth would be the new God Tier... sadly, Pokemon Trainer wont be moving up too much since he already does fairly well against MK
Then say squirtlesquirtle does good on MK.