Y.b.M. disagrees that falln is the best Kirby. I know he has been doing amazing, but I don't think it holds more weight than the matches and victories that I've achieved or what Chudat achieved. Not taking credit away from him at all, but I feel like more is needed...or maybe I'm overlooking something...
if so, enlighten me please.....
No offense but I think current places and defeats matter more than past results. People get better. For example someone going to smash tourneys since 08 may have beaten m2k with kirby but now as m2k has gotten better can't touch him 2011. Now if he beat m2k this year that would be a different story.
Also, someone playing longer like since 08 will most likely have more achievements since they have had more opportunities. U can't hold that against new players and say that an old player will always hold the top spot because they did stuff in the past. It's not fair and doesn't matter imo. Now if u can do those same things now then that matters. The metagame has evolved and the community has gotten better.
Again if those "achievements" are current than I agree. But not stuff that happened years ago. It's good but doesn't hold merit for a current placing imo. Players current achievements and falls should be compared. Now if you no longer rep that character then you honestly shouldn't be on the list anyway. In conclusion, current greatness does matter the most imo.
I mean I may be ignorant but I don't think Ken is still considered the best marth in melee. lol I may be wrong tho.