KingofPhantoms
The Spook Factor
The one thing I like about Mufasa is that, while still trying to reinvent his and Scar's backstories in a way that doesn't really align with any other continuity of the franchise (there's zero indication that Mufasa was adopted in any other piece of Lion King media), it's clear that the people working on it do care about continuity and the franchise as a whole.
Kiara, for example, made her second return to the franchise in this film. Not only is she quite a popular character among the franchise's fans, but she's also the very first character from a Disney direct-to-video sequel to make an appearance in any of their live-action films, in addition to (IIRC) being the first to appear in a TV series as well, specifically The Lion Guard.
Then you have the fact that Scar's original name in the film is Taka, something that was previously only ever stated to be the case in The Lion King: Six New Adventures books, which were made as sequels/prequels to the original film after it proved a major success. The books weren't written by anyone actually working at Disney IIRC, and it was eventually confirmed that the books were never really canon because of that, which ultimately makes sense as it contains characters who don't exist in any other story taking place after the first film. It's still somewhat sad as there's a lot of good writing potential there, and Scar's and Mufasa's backstories were generally considered a highlight of the books.
Finally, while I haven't seen the film yet, I've read that Simba and Nala have another cub at the end of the film, specifically a male one, meaning Kiara once again has a little brother. If the cub isn't Kion from The Lion Guard, then with all the other references, there's no doubt in my mind that it's at least meant to be an allusion to Kion.
Shockingly enough, for a sequel/prequel to a CGI remake we didn't really need, the film actually seems to have better respect for it's franchise than the almost every other Disney live-action remake. The story's probably notably flawed, but the writers and the rest of the film's staff absolutely deserve credit for taking great care to acknowledge both important and lesser known aspects of the Lion King franchise. Disney's decision to make it might have been a cash grab, but you can't say that the majority of the people working on the film don't care about the source material.
Kiara, for example, made her second return to the franchise in this film. Not only is she quite a popular character among the franchise's fans, but she's also the very first character from a Disney direct-to-video sequel to make an appearance in any of their live-action films, in addition to (IIRC) being the first to appear in a TV series as well, specifically The Lion Guard.
Then you have the fact that Scar's original name in the film is Taka, something that was previously only ever stated to be the case in The Lion King: Six New Adventures books, which were made as sequels/prequels to the original film after it proved a major success. The books weren't written by anyone actually working at Disney IIRC, and it was eventually confirmed that the books were never really canon because of that, which ultimately makes sense as it contains characters who don't exist in any other story taking place after the first film. It's still somewhat sad as there's a lot of good writing potential there, and Scar's and Mufasa's backstories were generally considered a highlight of the books.
Finally, while I haven't seen the film yet, I've read that Simba and Nala have another cub at the end of the film, specifically a male one, meaning Kiara once again has a little brother. If the cub isn't Kion from The Lion Guard, then with all the other references, there's no doubt in my mind that it's at least meant to be an allusion to Kion.
Shockingly enough, for a sequel/prequel to a CGI remake we didn't really need, the film actually seems to have better respect for it's franchise than the almost every other Disney live-action remake. The story's probably notably flawed, but the writers and the rest of the film's staff absolutely deserve credit for taking great care to acknowledge both important and lesser known aspects of the Lion King franchise. Disney's decision to make it might have been a cash grab, but you can't say that the majority of the people working on the film don't care about the source material.
Last edited: