ShadowLink84
Smash Hero
Where do ******** comments like these come from?Because the sonic players believe they can fight MK >_>
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Where do ******** comments like these come from?Because the sonic players believe they can fight MK >_>
Thought I might restate my opinion >.>Don't ban Metaknight.
Instead, consider unbanning certain stages.
Discuss.
THANK YOU! I have been getting some flak over having an honor code. It's stupid. Seriously, some things should be nerfed a bit to start with. This includes stuff my mains have. (Olimar I think should be revamped by having the Pikmin stages actually do something so that he'd be a character who would reward survival talent, but if he, Diddy, and even Ness would be on the weaker than Mario half of the PD concept I'll be quite fine with that.)also @ Everybody
also dont look at peoples mains to try to discredit their opinions on this. that will not get anything accomplished. for the record, i am astounded, ASTOUNDED at the number of sonic players that dont support the ban
You haven't seen my Priority Decay idea, huh? Under the PD idea, the tornado would have a very high PD rate. The tornado's INITIAL priority would crash and burn. Spamming it would no longer be viable because Meta Knight would open himself up to harassment.guys guys how about this. limit to an amount of tornados a match
i nvr use tornado anyway
Probably from the truth. Sonic players live a fantasized existence.Where do ******** comments like these come from?
Read ShadowLinks sig. We KNOW we suck. But hey, at least we aren't Young Link. =PProbably from the truth. Sonic players live a fantasized existence.
Thought I might restate my opinion >.>
We have Dedede banned stages.
Why not have Metaknight Unbanned stages?
Suddenly Bridge of Eldin and Shadow Moses could be unbanned.
(Note *could*. This is a viewpoint I'm still quite neutral on).
Cute. Well, when I see a Young Link, I'll let you know.Read ShadowLinks sig. We KNOW we suck. But hey, at least we aren't Young Link. =P
Two problems:Thought I might restate my opinion >.>
We have Dedede banned stages.
Why not have Metaknight Unbanned stages?
Suddenly Bridge of Eldin and Shadow Moses could be unbanned.
(Note *could*. This is a viewpoint I'm still quite neutral on).
O_OExxxxxxxxxactly. I just wanna see how the public community votes.
And you lost some of my respect.Probably from the truth. Sonic players live a fantasized existence.
*Walks away, whistling to himself*...Cute. Well, when I see a Young Link, I'll let you know.![]()
Ooohh, I get it now. Thanks.It was just me jokin' around cause he mained YL in Melee.
Meta Knight can still be beaten.so whats the anti ban argument at the moment?
He can still be beaten, and once he's banned, he won't be unbanned (supposedly).so whats the anti ban argument at the moment?
It's because 90:10 to everyone is what the banned characters from other games go.If he 90-10 everyone he could still be beaten once out of every 10 times I don't see how that holds up especially since the argument towards banning him is that the best chance of beating him is the mirror match not that its the only one.
Even if he were banned research on the game wouldn't stop. There's still a chance he'd be reinstated.He can still be beaten, and once he's banned, he won't be unbanned (supposedly).
In time, everyone will be MK, or face disadvantage.so whats the anti ban argument at the moment?
Thet problem is that once something is banned, it is often more difficult to have it un-banned.Even if he were banned research on the game wouldn't stop. There's still a chance he'd be reinstated.
I don't think we should be looking at other games since pokemon would fall under that category.It's because 90:10 to everyone is what the banned characters from other games go.
But that doesn't take into account that Brawl has a drastically different atmosphere than other games, and a character being as out of balance as MK is may in fact qualify for broken in Brawl when it wouldn't in the other games. Which is a large part of the debate, really.
Well the rules for banning concerning that of pokemon are relatively the same.I don't think we should be looking at other games since pokemon would fall under that category.
Oh definitely. But it's hard for the people trying to get him BANNED too. That's why all the debate EXISTS.Thet problem is that once something is banned, it is often more difficult to have it un-banned.
So what of the 'Dedede rule' in advanced slobs counterpicks?Two problems:
1. In advanced slobs counterpicks, stages are picked before characters.
Not really.Oh definitely. But it's hard for the people trying to get him BANNED too. That's why all the debate EXISTS.
I know you know all that. I'm just sayin'.
I said hard not hardER. It'd be way hardER to get him unbanned.Not really.
For example as of now Mk does seem ban worthy.
If we banned him now the metagame would mature withut him.
At which point why should we unban him?
The game is fine, its diverse, nothing is being overcentralized and we would only look back at MK's worst points.
So its often more difficult, hence why Roe v. Wade is so important to abortion supporters.
I agree, I was just answering the question. It's not my belief that we should say MK must be equal to Akuma in effectiveness or never be banned.I don't think we should be looking at other games since pokemon would fall under that category.
The banned stages aren't looked at because the majority of them were banned for abuse from walkoff chaingrabs (Or infinites against walls) and nothing has changed that would impact that -- so why look at them again? This wouldn't be true in relation to Meta Knight if new ATs were found for characters.I kinda think its a bit hard to unban something that has been banned.
Items and stages are Brawl examples, and no one has looked at the banned stages much(Mario Kart, Bridge of Eldin, Shadow Moses), and the item play has just started looking at the items again.
Technically, if a certain character started to dominate the metagame and took most kills offstage in gimps, but was lightweight and also didn't star KO that often, then it might be useful to look back at Shadow Moses Island.The banned stages aren't looked at because the majority of them were banned for abuse from walkoff chaingrabs (Or infinites against walls) and nothing has changed that would impact that -- so why look at them again? This wouldn't be true in relation to Meta Knight if new ATs were found for characters.
the reason it is accurate is because it is a fighting game.I agree, I was just answering the question. It's not my belief that we should say MK must be equal to Akuma in effectiveness or never be banned.
Not those specifically but the degree.The banned stages aren't looked at because the majority of them were banned for abuse from walkoff chaingrabs (Or infinites against walls) and nothing has changed that would impact that -- so why look at them again? This wouldn't be true in relation to Meta Knight if new ATs were found for characters.
DDD can't chainthrow MK.On the other hand, I'd be really great if SMI and BoE's DDD advantage canceled out MK gimp advantage. .
Say what? DDD's chaingrab is not hard, nor is it hard for DDD (with one of the largest grab ranges in the game) to land a grab.DDD will not be capable of CGing someone to death on Eldin's bridge.
You can avoid being grabbed its hard but it can be done).
the issue is that it promites camping and reduces things to only one strategy.
So if we have two walls vs one, everyone will try to infinite the other.
it breaks the game to, whoever gets backed into a wall first.
is it really THAT hard to unban him?A good part of the reason Meta Knight is so hard to get a ban on is because it would be so hard to unban him later. When an action is pretty much all-or-nothing, people become wary.
is it really THAT hard to unban him?
Consider how many people are adamant about NO items being on, even benign ones like food, and tell me that it won't be hard to unban something once banned.is it really THAT hard to unban him?
well... you know, it's a different situation entirely. not that the point doesn't hold some water, but we'd unban MK if convincing evidence arose that he would no longer be dominant, like a major shift caused by a huge AT or something.Consider how many people are adamant about NO items being on, even benign ones like food, and tell me that it won't be hard to unban something once banned.