adumbrodeus
Smash Legend
We're competitive gamers, we're legalistic because we play to win... you should know this.Sorry that I was silly enough to assume that intelligent players would be able to realize that my criteria for a banning call would be more than being beaten.
... and how does this relate at all?It's this case in many games if you HAVE to compare.
How many times would you see a low tier beating a top tier in another game.
Of course it was possible, but rare.
Generally Akuma is brought up for Reductio Ad Absurdum, aka, your logic is bad because it protects characters as broken as Akuma, or the like.This line of reasoning is horrible, ESPECIALLY with the akuma use.
Akuma is on a whole new tier of broken then you cant even hope to imagine.
Unless you've actually fought against another HUMAN akuma player in a serious match (as in for money or tourney). You have absolutely no idea how broken Akuma is.
And why is this?And to the person that thinks Snake has a slightly losing matchup, i highly disagree. I believe its dead even.
Better range, rushdown, recovery harassment, etc.
All Snake does is eliminate the tornado and drill rush (which isn't too good anyway) with 'nades and kill him early. It's simply not enough.
Anything is possible GIVEN an infinite amount of time. Perfect balance requires perfect equilibrium, which means balance of an infinite number of factors. While technically not impossible, for all practical purposes it is impossible.Well, the idea is to NOT let characters get banned and to also give every character a fair chance. Wouldn't it be nice to have a smash game were EVERY matchup was exactly 50:50?
Don't say that's impossible becuase anything is possible.