Browny
Smash Hater
Pro-Ban:
-Meta Knight is always the best (safest) choice. true
-Many smashers are switching to Meta Knight in order to win more consistently. This is an exponential growth type effect, and is creating more and more MK mains. true
-Meta Knight limits character diversity by causing the opposition to pick MK in order to counter him, as another MK has the "best" matchup against MK. true
-Meta Knight is causing players to quit the game because of his dominance, shrinking the competitive community. true
-Meta Knight cripples the metagame because all strategies are currently going towards beating Meta Knight, rather than general strategies. true
-Meta Knight may cause seizures if stared at directly for long periods of time. true
Anti-Ban:
-Banning Meta Knight is an irreversible process - unbanning is very unlikely to happen. speculation
-Meta Knight has matchups which are even, and this allows him to be beaten, removing the need for a ban. wisful thinking
-Strategies for beating Meta Knight are still being developed. This does NOT necessarily mean AT's, but specific matchup discussion. Many discoveries remain to be made. wishful thinking
-The game is only 6 months old. It is far too early to ban a character when the metagame is not completely developed. speculatiob[/b[
-Other fighting games have had characters with few bad matchups and disadvantages, and they were not officially banned. few =/= 0
-Much of MK's dominance may be due to certain players (M2K, Dojo, etc.). Other characters have dedicated pros who are able to beat Meta Knights quite often (Azen, Santi, etc). Everyone knows this isnt the case, MK dominates tourneys everywhere, all the time
-Yuna says so. (Just kidding, don't e-*****slap me!)
I'm just offering this up. People who have been away or are just arriving, enjoy.
Discuss!
discussed