Jupz
Smash Master
-reads previous page-
It seems to me as if you cannot really anaylze a characters traits and base there tier ranking on that :/
I have ulitimatly been wondering what is the best way to rank characters on the tier list. There are so many variables in brawl that it seems that a simple look at pros and cons will not work. Neither is peoples opinions. With opinions all you get is that yes snake is really good and at the top. Ganon is bad and at the bottom. Or others discussing over a single spot.
The only way I can think of accuratly looking at tier list spots are MU results. By looking at all the indiviual MUs, you automatcially look at all aspects of that those two characters you get a number for that match-up. Multiple that by all the possible MUs and that should reflect the characters total possibilities. Look at MK. He has all positive match-ups I believe that means without a doubt that he takes spot one. The next would more than likely not have any negitive match-ups. You cannot take an average as one character might have plenty of **** match-ups that offset there poor match-ups placing them higher than they should be.
Matchups are taken into account when deciding a tier list, but they are not the only way of deciding.
However when it comes down to a simple 1v1 match, ALL that matters is the MATCHUP. If for example the Metaknight vs Ganon matchup was even, that would mean if they were both the same skill they would both have an even chance at winning, even though Metaknight is the far superior character.