SilentFalcon
Smash Apprentice
No I mean, Melee has not ended!!!!Didn't you see the final melee tier list?
LIIIIVE I TELL YOU!
LOL
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No I mean, Melee has not ended!!!!Didn't you see the final melee tier list?
Dude there are people that I have debated with on this forum about that point constantly. You would be shocked how many people don't understand something that's this obvious.Basic logic needs cookies?
dayum.
:D
On the contrary, a lot of top tier characters shifted around, Falco went up a few spots into third, and R.O.B. lost his top tier placement completely.i am happy to see olimar to get a little more respect. lucas is definately > ness. not suprised to see no changes in the very top and very bottom
Telling you guys. This is your best answer to make the people who complain shut upI have the best option for you guys when you make the next tier list. Put Yoshi in Cookie Tier, and Sonic in Steak Tier, and I guarantee that none of them will get pissed. True fax I'm spittin out right now mang.
This. What the SBR publishes is their best guess at what the true tier list is. The SBR can't make a character better or worse. All they do is try to figure out how characters stand in relation to each other.If no one played the game there would no tiers? Flawed argument. You are going under the assumption that someone must have knowledge of a game for tiers to exist. As long as the game exists, there are tiers. Whether you know it or I know it or anyone knows it. It's a part of the programming of the game itself.
lol QFTThis. What the SBR publishes is their best guess at what the true tier list is. The SBR can't make a character better or worse. All they do is try to figure out how characters stand in relation to each other.
That made me furious.That made me giggle a bit
F for fabulousF most definately stands for "FUN" tier.
It's pure coincidence that they ended up the same. Remember, these are averages of multiple votes.Lucas 4.50
Ness 4.50
...I'm seriously thinking the SBR just doesn't know much about the differences of Lucas and Ness...
unless of course their tournament results are the EXACT same and they conveniently just used that as their reference
Yo dude, I think your sig has a typo.I expected Pit to drop a bit with the lack of many great Pits placing high, with the exception of Sagemoon. I however, did not expect him to drop this much. Now TL and freakin Olimar is above him! I now see this so-called "tier list" to be full of biasedness.
And Fox, he apparently suffered the most, and I didnt think he'd be that low now.
As said before, I see this tier list to be the most biased of them all (with the exception of stupidly "Opinion" tier lists). It's so biased to me that idk how they're ranking chars anymore, with the exception of Metaknight and Snake, because their spots are not goin to change.
Not many ppl are taking chars that dropped so much (like poor Pit and Fox) so seriously, and that annoys me so much. This is why I try not to care about tiers, but that haunted feeling always comes back, especially the Pit part.
I suppose the ONLY thing I can benefit from this is that I finally get to taunt Olimars and TLs (or some1 else higher than Pit) and say "You lost to a low tier" when I beat em with Pit.
But honestly guys.... Poor Fox.
Super Sonic tier?Meta Knight in Super Saiyan Tier?
You forgotSuper Sonic tier?
Social Security tier?
Schutzstaffel tier?
Steamship tier?
Special Stage tier?
Strong Safety tier?
Solid Snake tier?
Stainless steel tier?
Summer Slam tier?
melee beasts get ownedZelda 7.03
Bowser 6.91
Fox 6.66
Sheik 6.44
Overall, I like this tier list pretty well. I lol'd at Fox moving down 5 places.I move to amend the tier list:
To put the fish (from Summit) at SSS Tier.
you forgot Swastika tierSuper Sonic tier?
Social Security tier?
Schutzstaffel tier?
Steamship tier?
Special Stage tier?
Strong Safety tier?
Solid Snake tier?
Stainless steel tier?
Summer Slam tier?
Falco has more evenly spread good matchups, and some of them are with higher tier characters (the fact that some of his bad ones are covered a bit with CG isn't bad either).Yesss, glad to see falco moving up. It's almost surprising to me too even with ChillinDude/Sethlon/SK92 owning with falco I thought D3 would be above him at least since he seems to almost always be taking top spots...
I thought Ice Climbers would be higher too They're sooo hard to beat if the player can chaingrab. Seriously who beats Ice Climbers except for Meta?!? *Runs from bias and angry Ice Climber players*
Lol @ irony, I remember u, prolly most bias pit on our matchup discussions. I still somewhat disagreed with 50:50. Pit's placement is due to tourney performance (not many are getting high placement).I expected Pit to drop a bit with the lack of many great Pits placing high, with the exception of Sagemoon. I however, did not expect him to drop this much. Now TL and freakin Olimar is above him! I now see this so-called "tier list" to be full of biasedness.
And Fox, he apparently suffered the most, and I didnt think he'd be that low now.
As said before, I see this tier list to be the most biased of them all (with the exception of stupidly "Opinion" tier lists). It's so biased to me that idk how they're ranking chars anymore, with the exception of Metaknight and Snake, because their spots are not goin to change.
Not many ppl are taking chars that dropped so much (like poor Pit and Fox) so seriously, and that annoys me so much. This is why I try not to care about tiers, but that haunted feeling always comes back, especially the Pit part.
I suppose the ONLY thing I can benefit from this is that I finally get to taunt Olimars and TLs (or some1 else higher than Pit) and say "You lost to a low tier" when I beat em with Pit.
But honestly guys.... Poor Pit and Fox... Especially Fox.
Everyone is getting better relative to how they were, though, and the least favorable matchups for MK have been that way for what, a few months now?it's instead of others getting closer to MK's level, MK seems to be getting better and better.
So no good reason, really.You just judge both characters on their individual merit, so no, it wouldn't place them right next to each other. If it confuses you, just forget about the down+B. In Melee you always knew switching from Zelda to Sheik would be a huge tier jump, it didn't make Zelda top tier and we always went with them being separate characters. Admittedly, switching is more viable in Brawl, but I for one can't think of them as one character.
The problem is that switching decreases the number of unfavorable matchups, as well as giving you access to the other character's moveset, which has other advantages. Unlike in Melee, in Brawl Shiek doesn't have a ton of powerful kill moves, which means that changing to Zelda (assuming you're good with both characters) mid-life could benefit you for killing someone as well (a situational advantage seperate from matchup advantage).They are different characters with different movesets. If you're only going to do one or the other (if you're going to list either Zelda and Sheik separately OR list them as one, not both), listing them separately is more informative. People who switch to get the benefits of both can think of themselves as switching between two characters (which is really what they're doing), and people who don't switch won't look at the list and say "huh?" and scratch their heads.
EVERYTHING is relative. As such, the ability to switch is highly advantageous, so they aren't "X good".I don't see whats wrong with Sheik and Zelda as separate. While you are Sheik you are this good, and while you are Zelda you are this good. That's what its saying.
Just because you can, in theory, chaingrab everyone, in practice it doesn't work out that way because some characters are good at preventing the ICs from grabbing you in the first place. And yes, their crap grab range makes a huge difference, which is why they aren't horrendously broken; its quite possible to keep them away from you.Ugh... DDD can't chaingrab all characters infinitely like IC can. DDD can only infinite grab a few characters, like DK, Bowser, DDD, Mario, Luigi, and sometimes Samus. Crap grab range doesn't mean too much when you have 2 chances to grab, both Popo and Nana can grab, and if Popo misses the grab, Nana can grab right away after Popo misses.
You are in clear denial of reality.Let it be known that I do not think any characters have any hidden potential that will ever cause them to rise exponentially on the list barring some huge glitch.
I feel like the tiers are pretty much set in stone and have been since the 6th month or so. Maybe less.
For reference, there are characters in Super Street Fighter II Turbo, such as T-Hawk, who, despite having infinites, aren't even good.Rename G Tier Captain Falcon tier because Captian Faclon is too good. Also why are IC so low. Can't they epic chain grab?
You need a better imagination then!By the way, I'm not saying any tier arrangement is possible. It's hard to imagine MK not being the best. What I'm saying is that I simply don't think there is some ultimate arrangement of each and every character in there. Even though tiers depend on character attributes, which are coded into the game from the start.