Correct me if I'm wrong but.... wasn't it announced BEFORE ranbats that it wouldn't count toward the PR?
No they weren't stated as events that wouldn't count for the PR.
If anyone is taking any of this to heart, remember who's posting most of this.....me. When have any of you seen me hold a grudge or start screaming at someone over Brawl? I'm just stating the problems that I'm seeing with the PR and I am offering justification for why they are problems. The biggest problems I see are:
1) You need to set guidelines for what is going to count for the PR BEFORE the tourney actually happens. Only under extenuating circumstances should you discount tournies after they have happened (e.g. problems with the TO, unfair rulings, misconduct, etc.).
2) Keep the season period stagnant. All the fluctuation with the season ending date skews results and will likely end in a situation similar to this one.
3) Use results, not "skill". PR's are a reflection of the state's CURRENT skill level. Roller put it very well in a post before about this. I don't remember where it was, but it went along the lines of: If someone checked the MI PR and they saw L_Cancel, Kenny, Judge, Lain, Anther, Myself, and Boxxy; then decided that they would go to a tourney in MI, they would be disappointed as most of those players were inactive this entire season. If they're not going to tournies they shouldn't be on the PR. Same for OH; Even if Shugo (just an example) is going to be the best player regardless if he plays for months or not. If he's not going to tournies don't put him on there. This is a PR thread not a museum showcasing OH's talent over multiple seasons.
4) Compile the results. Panelists are expected to gather the data, compile it into an organized chart, and form a list of the top players based on those results. If you do this as the season goes on, it's not a hassle at all. Every tourney, just keep a note of any notable wins/losses (takes 5 mins). Also, please post full results, especially if you plan to use the all-pool format. No one can rightfully determine who defeated who at tournies where the results are:
1. Player-A
1. Player-B
1. Player-C
4. Player-D
4. Player-E
4. Player-F
7. Player-G
7. Player-H
I never stated that anyone should relieve themselves as panelist, I just want you all to give fair and impartial results. Regardless if your scene is "dying" or you think that it doesn't matter because "you're all bad", that shouldn't stop you all from doing your jobs and doing it right.
Also, if anyone is wondering why I'm causing so much of a fret over this, it's because I hate seeing people getting jacked out of something they deserve. Those two deserve those spots, no reason to keep them from getting what they deserve.