-ACE-
Gotem City Vigilante
I was providing an example Kev. I made it clear in that post where I draw the line.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
in response to kevinand my post wasn't saying what will happen... but what should happen imo and are just ideas for the future.
I'd be down lol. The trick is getting TOs to implement this stuff not saying it here. XDmaybe we can have tournaments specifically for rankings or maybe even round robins for rankings data or something like that especially for the smaller tournaments
Makes sure matches get played asap and disqualify who doesn't listen or who is playing friendlies when they shouldn't and seriously disqualify them if they don't listen so we have enough time to do othings like pools or round robins or something like thatWhat do you guys need me to do
*Takes sunglasses off*
I don't see why you should prefer NC-only tourneys over tourneys that include people from OOS. The smash scene isn't supposed to molded to make it easy for the PR panelists; the panelists are supposed to be knowledgeable enough (familiar with not only our scene but other scenes within our region, as well as VA's scenes... again, this is where having more panelists helps) and unbiased enough to decide how much certain wins and losses to players from OOS are. There is nothing unfortunate about G6 being a big portion of the procedure to me. Snap stepping up is great. The fact that OOS players are willing to come to those events is effin awesome. I'm sure other people will step up soon as well, but in the meantime we should be thankful for what we have.@Ace: Yeah I feel you. I'd prefer to have much more NC-only tourneys but we can't deny that OOS is coming to most of ours unless we start hosting more non-G6 things so that has to be a big part of our procedure for now unfortunately.
Pools are confirmed for G6 3Makes sure matches get played asap and disqualify who doesn't listen or who is playing friendlies when they shouldn't and seriously disqualify them if they don't listen so we have enough time to do othings like pools or round robins or something like that
<.<I don't see why you should prefer NC-only tourneys over tourneys that include people from OOS. The smash scene isn't supposed to molded to make it easy for the PR panelists; the panelists are supposed to be knowledgeable enough (familiar with not only our scene but other scenes within our region, as well as VA's scenes... again, this is where having more panelists helps) and unbiased enough to decide how much certain wins and losses to players from OOS are. There is nothing unfortunate about G6 being a big portion of the procedure to me. Snap stepping up is great. The fact that OOS players are willing to come to those events is effin awesome. I'm sure other people will step up soon as well, but in the meantime we should be thankful for what we have.
You don't need the inui logic, that's my point. It's good that you have 3 panelists now, but I think you could use 4. Panelists should decide how important a win vs someone from OOS is, for reasons I listed in my previous post. There is too much gray area when I see something like, josh beat theo when theo was sick but theo beat adam when adam hadn't slept in 68 hours... So josh's win over theo is OMG HUGE. A win is a win, but when you carry it over to include who the next person beat it get's ******** imo.<.<
Okay yes those things are great but then don't complain when we have a lot of OOS and somewhat inui logic'ing to do. The panel is just working with what we have. It's unfortunate because it makes people unhappy and think we're not doing our job but I like having OOS at our tournaments obviously lol.
Wait. . . you just used Inui logic. @__@ Judging how important a certain win is because of who they beat or lost to is Inui logic. Bad Inui logic is saying A > C becasue A > D and D > C while ignoring that C > A. Just gotta think about all results.You don't need the inui logic, that's my point. It's good that you have 3 panelists now, but I think you could use 4. Panelists should decide how important a win vs someone from OOS is, for reasons I listed in my previous post. There is too much gray area when I see something like, josh beat theo when theo was sick but theo beat adam when adam hadn't slept in 68 hours... So josh's win over theo is OMG HUGE. A win is a win, but when you carry it over to include who the next person beat it get's ******** imo.
You got to the argument after everybody had already chilled. haha YOU calm down, girl.Have we not taken Sneak on in an attempt to get your opinions back here? Calm down.
characters are more important than set count in my opinion, so I would start looking at that first.
characters are never important
ever
go back to cooking ocean
i will ejaculate in your food
can't wait![]()
love you too ocean!!!!!!
wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow
i have no words
jesus ****
f
hnpy8usphnuid;;di;rdoonjup9iidoz;jngifpgujipgsodojgofjkpspuiojhrndojnhgrsiupeojgu9posj9pug9ojfoijkps\macdaddy <3
oh boy