Merkuri
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,860
Oh well I guess we're in somewhat of an agreement here. I just saw you right this long text about how the two metagames are different and it looked as if you were arguing something else.lol...you missed the point of my post I guess. I never said you said anything. Otherwise I would've quoted something specific. I'm just saying Ken at his best was better then M2K before he reached his full potential. No need for anymore arbitrary statements though. The fact that you put in "While they both took the game seriously" Suggests that you don't believe M2K's win over Ken was legit or something..... You think Ken in his prime is better then any of the current top 20 in the world? I just wanna know.
Johns aside I suppose M2k win over Ken at oc3 was legit, I already stated why a single win doesn't mean anything. Looking at both of their tourney performance immediately after OC3 still gives the impression that Ken was the better player(case and point evo 2007); IDK if Ken in his prime would be as good as any of the top 20 today. It's difficult to apply the metagame from 3 years ago today, had Ken entered Apex he may have done reasonable well, likewise he may have done pretty terribly, it could have gone either way imo.