ElPanandero
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 1,100
- NNID
- ElPanandero
In addition to this, most also give at least basic training in disarmingStandard military training always includes unarmed combat.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In addition to this, most also give at least basic training in disarmingStandard military training always includes unarmed combat.
Yeah, Shinra would give the top SOLDIER's Mako injections to enhance their strength, speed, durability, ie: Super Soldiers you could say. But should we even considering Cloud's physical enhancements from Mako in this matchup?What exactly is Mako? Is is similar to ZSS's chozo enhancement (DNA) or something else? Because if it isn't I don't buy Cloud's super strength without muscle definition nor do I buy him picking up his sword.
Careful, I can hear the fanboys gathering lolAlso, Cloud would totally cry like a ***** for no reason if he so much as thought about Aeris during the fight.
Though as far back I remember, we never really considered it now did we?@Gold
There's no rule saying any character can't use the other's weapon against them
I was told that the L4D team couldn't take the weapons off the dead L4D2 team so I assume it'd be the same thing. . .otherwise the L4D team would've won that matchup instead of it just being a tie >.>;There's no rule saying any character can't use the other's weapon against them
exactly, if weapon-stealing were allowed, would there have been debate over Roy vs DK? (Big monkey overpowers a kid, steals his shinies then kills him with it...or just kills him as he is lacking a sword)I was told that the L4D team couldn't take the weapons off the dead L4D2 team so I assume it'd be the same thing. . .otherwise the L4D team would've won that matchup instead of it just being a tie >.>;
I was told that the L4D team couldn't take the weapons off the dead L4D2 team so I assume it'd be the same thing. . .otherwise the L4D team would've won that matchup instead of it just being a tie >.>;
Also, here's a post from another forum I happened to stumble across whilst looking for info.
"I believe, judging from the size, height, width and depth of the sword and comparing it to regular swords (5-7 lbs.), I'd guess, with the probability that the sword is made out of iron, and considering the person-sized aspect of the sword, I'd guess it's in the proximaty of 70-80 lbs."
While that may not be spot on...Cloud's Buster Sword is heavy as ****. How well is he really going to use a 80lbs, six foot long sword?
. . . .exactly, if weapon-stealing were allowed, would there have been debate over Roy vs DK? (Big monkey overpowers a kid, steals his shinies then kills him with it...or just kills him as he is lacking a sword)
If all enhancements and what they do to someone are intact (including durability of that body), take what he does in Advent Children without being suspended in midair with FF physics. what goes up must come down, but he can jump pretty **** high.well, define "jump high"
Except it was pretty clear cut that Roy would've outspaced the heck outta DK, so I fail to see how he'd manage to get the sword@rel: it's an example of what it could do to a matchup
thing is: how often would the fight turn to the ability to steal weaponary, instead of relying on what they brought to the table?
Where are you getting "seasoned" from?Crono
Seasoned and (until officially noted) self-trained, he's a sufficient fighter with a katana. Good enough that he's been able to topple immense forces such as Lavos with the help of those by his side. What he has an edge over Cloud in, is his capability for magic (namely lightning elements) that Cloud would otherwise need Materia for. There isn't too much to say about him since unlike Cloud, Crono hasn't had the exposure the FF icon has had to better reveal his prowess in cinematic fights. Graphical limitations didn't stop Crono's attacks from looking pretty **** strong when you upscale it into the environments you would see in the likes of Advent Children Complete. So taking that kind of strength, Crono has natural magic and skill with a katana at his side.
He is still very young and has a lot to learn. But that's never stopped young characters from being hax little things in the past.
Mostly cause the skill gap between Chrono and Cloud is so pathetically large, that's why it got brought up.What is this madness about weapons stealing? I would really want to know how someone would go about stealing a weapon without getting whipped by that weapon in the process of trying to take it.
x.x
(random entrance ftw)
When did we EVER allow weapon stealing? We never did, so why is it an uproar now? ICs and Olimar would be like B tier if that were possible. The exp. thing I don't buy because of examples like these. Sure, I agree for point 1 and some of point 3 but 2 is very far fetched.Not allowed?!
ARE YOU F*CKING KIDDING ME?!
This isn't cute fuzzy kitten's teatime with pretty flowers, this is A FIGHT TO THE DEATH!
Weapons stealing was always in, it just never was a potentially battle-changing maneuver because of one or more of these two reasons.
1. The other guy had powerful enough weaponry to not merit the extra expenditure in time and energy to steal, and since nobody had specialized weapons for it, disarming was just lumped in with fighting tactics. (ex. Samus against anyone)
2. For examples where it would've been relevant, the person where it was useful for wasn't skilled enough to actually succeed in disarming reliably, so it was a non-factor or died too early. (Peach against Zelda for example)
3. The individual was physically incapable of using the weapon or lacked the skills. (Bowser, metakight, also anybody against samus, Marth against snake, etc)
That's why I never brought it up.
This battle however, has all those attributes, Cloud has the skills and experience to take chrono's weapon, is capable of using it, and it presents a substantial concrete advantage.
Cloud's sword is useless, even placing him at the peak of human fitness for his build, it's too unweildy to be useful at all, he'd just abandon it, and go with fist-fighting and disarming tactics.
Based on WHICH MUs?When did we EVER allow weapon stealing? We never did, so why is it an uproar now? ICs and Olimar would be like B tier if that were possible. The exp. thing I don't buy because of examples like these. Sure, I agree for point 1 and some of point 3 but 2 is very far fetched.
Horibad examples. The reason that I didn't bring it up on those MUs is because they're in no position to do so.How hard is is to take Falcon's pistol and shoot? M2 robs Ness of his bombs and throws them back. Wario takes Weegee's hammers and throws them back. Wolf would steal Fox's gun and win. Pit would steal Link's bow. Lucas would take Tink's sword.
That's always been part of it because disarming is a BASIC FIGHTING SKILL. This is about superiority in a no holds barred duel to the death, not a pillow-fight or something.By allowing this you open up a conundrum that defiles what the thread is built upon and it becomes less of who's deadliest and more of who's the best at stealing their opponent's weapon.
But understand my point. Something like this only allows less logic with MUs and now because Cloud has a sword as big as him we bring it up.I think you're missing the point, it was never disallowed, and unless something is specifically disallowed, it's allowed.
Just because it never was a relevant enough factor to be discussed doesn't mean that it's disallowed.
Horribad examples are what you're going to hear on a consistent basis when ____ starts to lose their battle. But fine, I'll play by your rules:Based on WHICH MUs?
Horibad examples. The reason that I didn't bring it up on those MUs is because they're in no position to do so.
Pistols, guns, and bows? Are you kidding? You're dead before you get close enough to do so in the first place if you attempt it.
Why can't that apply to Cloud?People about evenly skilled with one having a good melee weapon? Well, you can try it, and if you get it, it lessons your disadvantage, but most times you're gonna die trying to get the weapon.
I still don't see why NOW it's a problem. Could have brought this up plenty of times (Olimar v. ICs, for ex.) but now its a problem.That's always been part of it because disarming is a BASIC FIGHTING SKILL. This is about superiority in a no holds barred duel to the death, not a pillow-fight or something.
But understand my point. Something like this only allows less logic with MUs and now because Cloud has a sword as big as him we bring it up.
Horribad examples are what you're going to hear on a consistent basis when ____ starts to lose their battle. But fine, I'll play by your rules:
Wario v. Ike
Ike has a sword, but Wario doesn't. Only theing seperating them is the blade itself, so if Wario somehow manages to get it from him he wins right?
And if we go by what you're saying....
Why can't that apply to Cloud?
I still don't see why NOW it's a problem. Could have brought this up plenty of times (Olimar v. ICs, for ex.) but now its a problem.![]()
You're starting to sound like Paya and Ike...
1. The other guy had powerful enough weaponry to not merit the extra expenditure in time and energy to steal, and since nobody had specialized weapons for it, disarming was just lumped in with fighting tactics. (ex. Samus against anyone)
2. For examples where it would've been relevant, the person where it was useful for wasn't skilled enough to actually succeed in disarming reliably, so it was a non-factor or died too early. (Peach against Zelda for example)
3. The individual was physically incapable of using the weapon or lacked the skills. (Bowser, metakight, also anybody against samus, Marth against snake, etc)
Firstly, you can't condone the use of horribad examples with that excuse, bad examples are bad for a reason, they make no logical sense and are as such useless.Horribad examples are what you're going to hear on a consistent basis when ____ starts to lose their battle. But fine, I'll play by your rules:
Wario v. Ike
Ike has a sword, but Wario doesn't. Only theing seperating them is the blade itself, so if Wario somehow manages to get it from him he wins right?
How does Cloud get his sword taken?Why can't that apply to Cloud?
It's a problem because the idea is brought up in a situation where it is so farfetch'd it's a wonder it was considered.I still don't see why NOW it's a problem. Could have brought this up plenty of times (Olimar v. ICs, for ex.) but now its a problem.![]()
You're starting to sound like Paya and Ike...
Woah! Calm the heck down man. No need for the outrage.Not allowed?!
ARE YOU F*CKING KIDDING ME?!
This isn't cute fuzzy kitten's teatime with pretty flowers, this is A FIGHT TO THE DEATH!
Weapons stealing was always in, it just never was a potentially battle-changing maneuver because of one or more of these two reasons.
1. The other guy had powerful enough weaponry to not merit the extra expenditure in time and energy to steal, and since nobody had specialized weapons for it, disarming was just lumped in with fighting tactics. (ex. Samus against anyone)
2. For examples where it would've been relevant, the person where it was useful for wasn't skilled enough to actually succeed in disarming reliably, so it was a non-factor or died too early. (Peach against Zelda for example)
3. The individual was physically incapable of using the weapon or lacked the skills. (Bowser, metakight, also anybody against samus, Marth against snake, etc)
That's why I never brought it up.
This battle however, has all those attributes, Cloud has the skills and experience to take chrono's weapon, is capable of using it, and it presents a substantial concrete advantage.
Cloud's sword is useless, even placing him at the peak of human fitness for his build, it's too unweildy to be useful at all, he'd just abandon it, and go with fist-fighting and disarming tactics.
And why would Cloud need to disarm Chrono if Cloud has a better ranged weapon and more combat experience. In fact, why would Cloud need to get close to Chrono to disarm him? If chrono comes swinging his Katana like an idiot, disarming him is simply placing the buster sword where Cloud can get enough leverage to wrench the sword out of Chrono's hand.@ Guest:
Think about this a little bit. Going to be presenting some known info here.
Crono's blade is smaller and more compact, and even with enhancements, the Buster Sword's only real practical use is a defensive weapon. It maybe be a good weapon for him since he has experience using it, but it is like a giant cleaver, large and unwieldy.
What is more, Cloud needs to use both hands in order to swing it, that denotes how heavy the blade is, in FF7 (I have seen the attack sequences for all his Limit Break and normal battle skills on youtube vids, and they were pretty good quality), there is no time that Cloud does not swing the Buster Sword with both hands, but it has a lot of raw cutting power due to it's weight and the shape of the blade.
Now, despite the fact Crono uses both hands to swing his katana, that is more a matter of technique than weight, a katana blade can be hefty, but its much more wieldy than the Buster Sword because of it's size and shape. This give Crono more potential mobility than Cloud unless he opts to try and disarm Crono of his katana, which won't be easy either since the blade is sharp like the Buster Sword's.
You can't just grab at the blade of the Katana and expect to take it from Crono despite his lack of professional training, Crono will probably be swinging that blade around, and more than likely grabbing at the air to catch it or something like that is going to result in some lost fingers or maybe even losing a hand, or whatever, depending on where the blade lands...assuming he even hits Cloud.
In order for Cloud to disarm Crono, he needs to be able to get close to him in order to incapacitate him enough to take the Katana from his hands. This can present and stand to be a problem.
No, but that's how I see your Cloud v. Chrono comparison. The fact that Chrono is just gonna get his sword taken from him so easily is what I find laughable. Why would Chrono allow Cloud to get close enough to get his sword?Are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that WARIO of all characters is gonna survive long enough to steal Ike's sword?
That he has the necessary training to do that to a highly trained expirienced mercenary? Really? What I'm saying is that even if Wario started out with Ike's sword, Ike could disarm him.
Where are you getting "average teen who picked up a sword for the first time"?If it makes the logic more difficult, so be it, when have I ever been the person to suggest we go an easier route? Real battles are a complex affair.
The real point in all this is, "enough of a difference in skill, and weapon deficiency steadily becomes irrelevant".
Cloud wins because his strong military background has left him skilled enough to defeat (using tactics not limited to disarming) an average teenager who just happened to pick up a sword for the first time.
Example was fail, but so is assuming you can embargo an opponents weapon because you were trained better.Firstly, you can't condone the use of horribad examples with that excuse, bad examples are bad for a reason, they make no logical sense and are as such useless.
Next: How would wario even get the sword without getting cut up in the process of trying to get to Ike with all that range. Plus, does Wario even have enough experience with swords to even use it correctly, from what I see, Ike's sword in Wario's hands would be unwieldy.
1.Cloud wouldn't be losing his sword.How does Cloud get his sword taken?
Ask yourself these questions:
Can Chrono get into clouds range without getting cut up?
Does Chrono have the means of taking Cloud's sword if he gets close?
Can Chrono even wield Cloud's sword?
Bolded and underlined for my entire point. And quit nitpicking at my examples of fail.It's a problem because the idea is brought up in a situation where it is so farfetch'd it's a wonder it was considered.
Olimar at least had somewhat of a chance with swarming the ICs. More bad examples....
I've been ninjer'd...
What classifies as "skill" to disarm an opponent? That's a very subjective term. And there is a big difference between a knife and sword, but I'm not gonna nitpick your example. But define who would have the skill to disarm and who wouldn't. I'll wait...In a realistic setting, if a manage to disarm my foe of their knife, why would I go into a fist fight when I can more effeciently wield said knife to kill?
Not using the knife would be less logical on a realistic basis
Because the skill to disarm is present so why not take advantage of the enemy's weapon?
Wherelse for characters like Wario or Olimar, they lack that skill to disarm/ability to effectively wield weapon/ability to bypass the enemy's offense/defense
Weapon stealing is fair game
THANK YOU!! Somebody gets it...Woah! Calm the heck down man. No need for the outrage.
@ Guest:
Think about this a little bit. Going to be presenting some known info here.
Crono's blade is smaller and more compact, and even with enhancements, the Buster Sword's only real practical use is a defensive weapon. It maybe be a good weapon for him since he has experience using it, but it is like a giant cleaver, large and unwieldy.
What is more, Cloud needs to use both hands in order to swing it, that denotes how heavy the blade is, in FF7 (I have seen the attack sequences for all his Limit Break and normal battle skills on youtube vids, and they were pretty good quality), there is no time that Cloud does not swing the Buster Sword with both hands, but it has a lot of raw cutting power due to it's weight and the shape of the blade.
Now, despite the fact Crono uses both hands to swing his katana, that is more a matter of technique than weight, a katana blade can be hefty, but its much more wieldy than the Buster Sword because of it's size and shape. This give Crono more potential mobility than Cloud unless he opts to try and disarm Crono of his katana, which won't be easy either since the blade is sharp like the Buster Sword's.
You can't just grab at the blade of the Katana and expect to take it from Crono despite his lack of professional training, Crono will probably be swinging that blade around, and more than likely grabbing at the air to catch it or something like that is going to result in some lost fingers or maybe even losing a hand, or whatever, depending on where the blade lands...assuming he even hits Cloud.
In order for Cloud to disarm Crono, he needs to be able to get close to him in order to incapacitate him enough to take the Katana from his hands. This can present and stand to be a problem.
Which is why I'm trying to figure out why we're having this discussion if Cloud is strong and skilled enough to use his own sword. I agree with this post. Chrono can't win if Cloud outranges him with his sword, which is what I said from the beginning.And why would Cloud need to disarm Chrono if Cloud has a better ranged weapon and more combat experience. In fact, why would Cloud need to get close to Chrono to disarm him? If chrono comes swinging his Katana like an idiot, disarming him is simply placing the buster sword where Cloud can get enough leverage to wrench the sword out of Chrono's hand.
In reference to animations, have you seen how fast Cloud swings his sword? Pretty fast for a sword of that size.
From what I see now, Chrono doesn't have much of a chance to get close.... and I don't think Cloud needs to worry about disarming Chrono moreso than the other way around.