AetherEch0s
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 460
- 3DS FC
- 2681-0290-3939
Waluigi is on top? Gamefaqs is gonna hate this.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Some dumb site made a stupid poll. They claim to have a source or something that can forward the results of this non-Japanese poll to Namco Bandai Games and Sakurai.Can someone explain the whole Stupid thing to me?
Actually, it seems to me like they held an earlier poll, and this is the first of a few run-offs. Either way, the selection is lame(no Megaman? WTF?). And before you say "oh, there are no 3rd parties", Prof. Layton is a third party and he's in there too.The main thing that irks me about that poll is that it only has one character from each series, despite the fact that several series have more than one possible candidate. It just unnecessarily limits the choices to pick from, and some of them seem an odd choice to pick from the series to stand out. I realize there is a write in section for characters that are missed out, but the characters that are actually in poll have an advantage.
Also they say you can only vote for 16 characters, but there's nothing stopping you voting for everyone so I don't even see the point of mentioning that. It's a nice idea to try and give a more western input when it comes to character choices but I don't really see this impacting anything in the slightest.
I have to admit, I thought I had heard of every possible Nintendo game they could pull characters from at this point, but I had never heard of Crystalis before this poll. Guess there are still some hidden mysteries in Nintendo's vault I've yet to discover.
It all makes sense now. Damn it, 4chan, why must you ruin everything good?Ah ok, so apparently the reason why Waluigi is doing so well is because 4chan is throwing all of their votes behind him. They're also doing write-ins for the Pokemon Dunsparce, the comments box is FULL of them.
Dah-waht?It might mean said DLC characters are banned from most tournaments (like the MvC3 DLC characters), but that's it.
Dunsparce, a normal type Pokemon with no redeeming qualities.@PsychoIncarnate if you dont mind me asking what exactly is that thing I know I've seen it before.
Well, he can be used as a paraflincher in NU
Of course K. Rool is higher than little mac, takamaru, and palutena...IMO what's wrong with the poll isn't so much that Waluigi is so high.
No, the wrong in it is that you got someone like K.Rool and even N being higher than Little Mac, Palutina and Takamaru.
Also there are so much things that are wrong with that list. No F-Zero rep? The only Wario rep being Ashley over Captain Syrup and Jimmy/Mona? Being a fan of both those series I'm really disappointed.
N being the only Pokemon rep is a bad choice, I'd take Zoroark over him. Then again I can't really think of any good Pokemon rep as of now since the ones we got is already good enough. Maybe change Pokemon Trainer to have other starters? I don't mind any gen, I like them all except 5's starters.
BUT K.Rool instead of any other single DK Country 1-2 character? ...ugh. Kremlings should remain dead as DK villains.
Well I don't really care what character we get as long as Little Mac is getting in, and Wario staying exactly the same as he is right now. Any F-Zero rep and a Wario rep that isn't Ashley are just icing in the cake for me, but I can live without any of them.
Don't get me wrong, I like K.Rool but...Of course K. Rool is higher than little mac, takamaru, and palutena...
He's the most popular newcomer for smash 4 after all.
He's also a better character than those 3
The fact you want kremlins gone as DK villains is horribly wrong and you should feel bad for it
The first game had a pirate theme as well, 2 just took it full on and did it better. How are they uninteresting characters? They were funny, unless you were expecting to take the game too seriously. They did it a lot better than the Tiki's in DKCR, which used the most generic boss type as their final boss.Don't get me wrong, I like K.Rool but...
1. He's a horrible villain and hasn't been relevant since Jungle Climber. His motive to steal DK's bananas is to make DK starve?
2. The Kremlings and K.Rool are uninteresting and underwent terrible character developments. What is with the sudden pirates theme in 2?
3. The only reason he's even popular is because of nostalgia.
4. Most of his fanbase are stubborn and blind. Keyword is most. I get people who actually want him in, and I respect that, but those nostalgia goggles and constant whining that I have seen has left a bad taste in my mouth.
I don't even want a new DK rep, but if we were getting one I actually would prefer Dixie but I don't want her in that much.
And no, a boxer and a goddess of light are much better than a goofy king that is worse than Bowser and Dedede in terms of character, motive and moveset potential.
But I digress, I really don't wanna argue about this. "Been there, done that", you could say, and it'll just derail the topic.
So because I don't find them funny I'm taking the game seriously? OK.The first game had a pirate theme as well, 2 just took it full on and did it better. How are they uninteresting characters? They were funny, unless you were expecting to take the game too seriously. They did it a lot better than the Tiki's in DKCR, which used the most generic boss type as their final boss.
...this has anything to do with what? I'm aware DKC2 is one of the best platformers, but I'm arguing about K.Rool being a bad character and not DKC being a bad game. (Because they're not. Well 2 and Returns aren't anyway.)Did you even play DKC 2? One of the best games even by today's standards, and one of the best games for the Super Nintendo.
Indeed he does, but so? I don't find a fat king crocodile who is also a pirate, wannabe frankenstein and...a wannabe boxer to be very appealing. That's just random to the extreme.He has moveset potential to spare, appearing in 4 games with different attacks in each of them.
If I'm bias, I would support him. Why? I like K.Rool, even more than Dedede and Bowser, and I like the Kremlings too. But I don't want him in. See the difference?Your bias against him is completely unfounded and a lot worse than their nostalgia goggles
Well as of now I am only arguing that he's a horrible villain in general. I am not completely against him.You're reasoning is riddled with inconsistencies considering some of the characters that are already in Smash.
WTF does a platform game need character development? Since when do Nintendo characters get character development?