Why yes! That is my sarcastic answer, but here is an answer that isn't full of holes:
Talking to someone and trying to submit to them a different opinion, one that is uneducated in the matter, in turn *could* educate someone if they didn't know in the first place. I have already gotten some more casual people to either A: realize that they were wrong in their reasoning, or B: realize that there isn't a solid reason to remove certain elements from brawl for the sake of it being different.
That and debating is just fun. I would definitely like to see you debate on how debating isn't entertaining, cause I'm pretty sure you enjoy debating with me on this matter right now.
That's really my point. The only reason anyone posts on a thread is becasue they want to. They enjoy it. There shouldn't have to be a reason for everything. If you get right down to it, this whole site was created for enjoyment - nothing more. And maybe I like tackling the (seemingly) impossible.
Now, onto things about why those points I said are less of a time waster:
1: You are trying to do something that has been done many times before by many gaming communities, and none have them have ever worked.
Who cares? There's always a first time for everything. Similar attempts by fans trying to get Nintendo to localize Mother 3, for instance, failed becuase Nintendo could care less about a handfull of fans.
Brawl, however, is a very important game in their Wii lineup. It has a massive fanbase that, if suffieciently riled up, could create some negative press and potentially hurt sales. If Nintendo thinks they can make more money by including online, they will do it.
2: You guys also don't seem to understand that if they can't get the online feature to work well, then it might be better to leave it OUT. It might not be feasible for it to work at all. I don't know if you guys understand this or not, but getting brawl to be played online isn't an easy task.
But they CAN get online to work - if they choose to. It's been done. Mario Strikers Charaged for Wiiis a 3-D, four player multiplayer game with FULL online play. Madden and the new 3-D Dragon Ball-Z fighter are both online. The PS2 had tons of online shooters. Puting a 2-D fighter online is possible. It doesn't have to be more robust that Halo 3, it just has to work.
3: The more time they spend working on this game, the more money is being spent. Nintendo might be cracking down on the budget or they might want to make for a holiday release. The thing is, regardless of online capabilities, this game is going to sell like hotcakes, and Nintendo's primary shareholders and all the higher ups know this. The most ironic thing, is that they know that the people sending emails are so dedicated with smash that you guys will still buy Brawl even if it's not online.
Yes, but Nintendo also wants to keep their customers loyal - if they can make money in the process.
So let's say Nintendo waits until the last possible moment before delaying Brawl, say late Novemeber. By then, they've already sold Wii's to people expecting a December release date. This increases sales of other Wii titles in the mean time, and then in March they deliver their trump card: Brawl with online play. Not only would that keep Nintendo fans happy, but it will also be the ultimate killer ap - thus selling more systems in the long run than if Brawl lacked online.
Nintendo isn't stupid: they know Brawl is going to sell well regardless. But they won't go out of their way to anger their fanbase either.
4: They may have it in, or plan on it being in but they just want to hype it up by getting you guys flustered.
Oh my gosh! You mean I may have flustered people unnecessarily?! How will I ever live with myself!!!
Honestly, what does it matter? If Brawl is confirmed to be online, then this thread will be gone in a week and forgotten in two. If it isn't onlne, then I'd say we have a right to be flustered.
While a lot of people fail at humor, some of the posts are quite funny.
Anyways, I'm off, gotta go work. I'll check back here later and we can debate more.
Don't get me wrong. I really like that thread. But it illustrates my point: not all threads have a purpose. They can just be for sheer enjoyment. And if that's all this thread is good for, then so be it. But if there is the slightest chance that we can prevent nintendo from making the worst mistake imaginable (forgive my hyperbole) then I say this thread is a worthwhile endevour.
And besides, I'm having fun.
http://wii.ign.com/articles/709/709205p1.html There you go. Sakurai even said it may take some time in the article, but I believe he and his team will pull it through.
It's great to here that Sakurai wants to include online. But I'm concerned that Nintendo might not give him enough time to complete his goal. Like Mookie said, Nintendo could release the game at any time and make a ton of cash. But WE'RE the ones who have to live with it for years to come.