Add to that the fact that she isn’t even requested a lot in Japan for Smash.
That’s what I meant by correlation. Her market doesn’t seem to mesh with Nintendo’s at the time, even now.
i dont understand how people are writing elma off when sakurai confirmed the timeline for decisions about the roster and dlc to be made in 2015.
xenoblade x came out in 2015. meaning he had plenty of time to play it, decide on a moveset and develop her. her priority would be shifted down because of them choosing to bring everyone back and she'd easily be behind the big time newcomers like Ridley and Isabelle and inkling.
One of the arguments WAY backon this forum was the timeline issue for rex to get in. and thats been confirmed now. also hate to break it to some people but elma moveset would be easily distinguishable from shulk's. rex im not as sure. the dlc i don't expect to be even close to any existing character in smash.
We don’t know when DLC was chosen, and it’s most likely that some of them were decided later on.
But a lot of people think Elma is likely now. She could’ve been one of the characters that had to be moved up to DLC, and with Rex/Pyra out of the table, seeing the noticeable lack of X content and how Elma was played up in her update for Xenoblade 2, there’s a lot that seems to be in her favor.