........Also. Is anyone else actually surprised that Sakurai hasn't even considered Transformers and/or ponies for Smash yet, given the amazing relationship between Hasbro and Nintendo?
........
Why, no, I'm not surprised.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
........Also. Is anyone else actually surprised that Sakurai hasn't even considered Transformers and/or ponies for Smash yet, given the amazing relationship between Hasbro and Nintendo?
If Shadow was still an assist literally what reason in the world would they have to not put him next to Sonic and Knuckles in Sonic's fighter video?You can rule out Banjo and Ken as assist trophies. And probably the Chorus Men/Mach too.
Shadow or Isaac would be the most likely ones out of the Grinch characters to be assists (as they already were).
Nintendo risking someone they are trying to catch and fire leaking fake Info without pictures leaking, ends up being fake == nobody dissapointed and backlashing at nintendo, but at the leaker insteadFinal thought.
We all know that They have been putting out fake characters to trick and obfuscate the real roster. What is to say that Nintendo is not doing the same with banners.
We know for a fact that as more people hear of the roster, the harder it is to contain. If they have multiple companies filling in orders for characters, what is to say they waste a few 100 bucks to have fake banners made to muddy the waters even more. Could explain why no one can agree on it.
It is unlikely, but something to consider.
Well they're already on board so get the two working together and BAM! it's done.Hate to break it to ya, but he's owned by Pachinkonami now
I don't think the original game had music...Well they're already on board so get the two working together and BAM! it's done.
Speaking of legalities, does anyone know why there's a Pac-Land stage but no Pac-Land music?
Damage Control is exactly what it sounds like. The company has felt damage (ie their roster got leaked) and are now trying to control how bad it gets (telling people not to talk about it, deny it, blacklist anyone revealing more stuff, finding the leaker). They are attempting to lessen how bad the leak hurtsI heard that Papagenos brought up the video. Can you please give me the link? I was told the TLDR/details, but not the link.
Apparently, the source says that Incineroar was SUPPOSED to be in the game, but instead he was cut from base/moved to DLC when he met up with Phil to recruit Banjo. Moreover, the Minecraft rumor was just leakbait, meaning Vergeben has been tricked (I feel bad for him.). Finally, Nintendo is doing damage-control.
P.S. What does 'damage control' means?
Because the music is from the hanna-barbara cartoonSpeaking of legalities, does anyone know why there's a Pac-Land stage but no Pac-Land music?
I talked this with my brother one day after the leak released, and well, it is possible but is like very very very unlikely.Final thought.
We all know that They have been putting out fake characters to trick and obfuscate the real roster. What is to say that Nintendo is not doing the same with banners.
We know for a fact that as more people hear of the roster, the harder it is to contain. If they have multiple companies filling in orders for characters, what is to say they waste a few 100 bucks to have fake banners made to muddy the waters even more. Could explain why no one can agree on it.
It is unlikely, but something to consider.
Again, not too different from the Gematsu leak + chorus kids.That's a possibility, but one of them mentions more or less "If this is real, one of the characters I know about must have been cut very recently"
It seems very, very odd.
ANOTHER insider gave info on the characters of the leak, only to end up backpedaling and making his twitter private.Can SOMEONE explain to me what happened last night? I saw the thread going a million miles an hour and nobody ever answered me.
ACP-PLV deletes office tour videoCan SOMEONE explain to me what happened last night? I saw the thread going a million miles an hour and nobody ever answered me.
Basically, this one credible guy is claiming that Isaac, Ken, and Chorus Kids are almost certainly in, but one of the other characters in the leak is actually an assist trophy... Also, he's not quite sure on Geno. He seems conflicted about him... Actually, he sounds conflicted about everything...Can SOMEONE explain to me what happened last night? I saw the thread going a million miles an hour and nobody ever answered me.
And to add to what Mellowy said, before he made his account private, he stated something along the lines of that he was contacted by someone who corrected/disproved/contradicted or something the information that he was handed out and was telling us.Can SOMEONE explain to me what happened last night? I saw the thread going a million miles an hour and nobody ever answered me.
Not sure about the Japanese version but the US version sure did..I don't think the original game had music...
Putting the top 3 most requested characters in a fake out is suicidal, plus the whole idea of a fake poster is dumb since they have to hire people and a company to print it.Final thought.
We all know that They have been putting out fake characters to trick and obfuscate the real roster. What is to say that Nintendo is not doing the same with banners.
We know for a fact that as more people hear of the roster, the harder it is to contain. If they have multiple companies filling in orders for characters, what is to say they waste a few 100 bucks to have fake banners made to muddy the waters even more. Could explain why no one can agree on it.
It is unlikely, but something to consider.
The theory that Banjo was decided to be put in the base game at E3 and replaced Incineroar is simply bull****; it takes over a year to create a new Smash character, a unique Banjo is not going to be in an acceptable working state within in a few months.I heard that Papagenos brought up the video. Can you please give me the link? I was told the TLDR/details, but not the link.
Apparently, the source says that Incineroar was SUPPOSED to be in the game, but instead he was cut from base/moved to DLC when he met up with Phil to recruit Banjo. Moreover, the Minecraft rumor was just leakbait, meaning Vergeben has been tricked (I feel bad for him.). Finally, Nintendo is doing damage-control.
P.S. What does 'damage control' means?
Analysis of the official banner which has weird glitchy/cut sections lead people to believe these were parts in which characters from the Grinch leak were shopped out. Theres a lot more to it, but people basically started looking for any clues in the bannerCan SOMEONE explain to me what happened last night? I saw the thread going a million miles an hour and nobody ever answered me.
What's this about a Stenee leak? Is this one of those laughably bad 4Chan posts?So guys...
Is the Stenee leak still going strong? Can’t wait to main her if so.
When you used "flies" and "lording" in the same sentence, it brought The Lord of the Flies to my mind, which is dangerously close to our current situation.The problem I've seen with the insiders and their attitude is they've forgotten the old adage: You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar. In the end, if the leak is fake, you have these people going "we told you so" and lording it over people, and if it's real, then they've taken a considerable blow to their professionalism and future credibility.
OT Question: but how do you get two or more gifs to show up on your signature?Analysis of the official banner which has weird glitchy/cut sections lead people to believe these were parts in which characters from the Grinch leak were shopped out. Theres a lot more to it, but people basically started looking for any clues in the banner
Meanwhile, insiders are feeling the pressure to explain why they doubt Grinch, and have essentially revealed that it gets a lot of characters right, but a couple wrong. Which is still under wraps as no one wants to completely blow their sources
There was a lot of back and forth about Isaac supposedly being hastily cut from the banner. It was basically reviving the whole 'Isaac was cut from the last direct due to sensitivity over the recent earthquake'. The bit where he is in the Grinch banner is interestingly where the different parts of the banner on the Smash site are a bit wonky, but then people showed how updates to the banner worked, meaning that it looking weird was inevitable and not necessarily a sign of someone or something being hastily removed.Can SOMEONE explain to me what happened last night? I saw the thread going a million miles an hour and nobody ever answered me.
Not to burst your bubble, but Sonic was developed in 3 monthsThe theory that Banjo was decided to be put in the base game at E3 and replaced Incineroar is simply bull****; it takes over a year to create a new Smash character, a unique Banjo is not going to be in an acceptable working state within in a few months.
If the leak is real and Incineroar is DLC, it'simply Banjo was in the game since December 2015 and Incineroar was a low priority character who couldn't be finished in time for the base game or was deliberate frontline DLC decided later in development.
It is very unlikely that Nintendo would be legally clear to produce artwork in any capacity that contains characters they don't own the rights to.Final thought.
We all know that They have been putting out fake characters to trick and obfuscate the real roster. What is to say that Nintendo is not doing the same with banners.
We know for a fact that as more people hear of the roster, the harder it is to contain. If they have multiple companies filling in orders for characters, what is to say they waste a few 100 bucks to have fake banners made to muddy the waters even more. Could explain why no one can agree on it.
It is unlikely, but something to consider.
Well, he was kinda rushed and reused a lot of other character's animations, and he rolls in his ball like a bajillion times...they definitely cut corners on himNot to burst your bubble, but Sonic was developed in 3 months
He was also inserted into the SSE during that time.... AND Jigglypuff, Wolf and Toon Link were also developed.Not to burst your bubble, but Sonic was developed in 3 months
Indeed, but nothing says they wouldn't do the same with Banjo, as extremely sad as that would be.Well, he was kinda rushed and reused a lot of other character's animations and he rolls in his ball like a bajillion times...they definitely cut corners on him
Welcome aboard dude, I also start posting because of the leak, and for a retro rep I think and I WISHI that will be my boy Saki from Sin and Punishment.I've been a guest watching this thread on and off for a few months now, but this leak has convinced me to actually post. So hi.
Leak aside though, since that's such a rabbit hole at this point, if the leak is fake, who do you guys think the retro rep would be?
Its honestly been like that since the news drought began this month. :/My god this community's been especially toxic since the leak. Did we get an influx of 4channers or something? Lots of "reeeee corporate shill" rhetoric going around that's laughably hard to take seriously. Honestly it's no surprise the community's being compared to crazed sycophants by some in the know.