Going with that...one thing I gotta say is if you compare Papagenos to the other insiders he's doing the same thing. Telling you to trust him without providing additional evidence.
Now I don't blame him! It's what insiders have to do. But it's interesting he comes out as a hero for it because he's agreeing with the leak opposed to the insiders who are considered "smug, elitist, rude etc".
I'm just saying I don't see what Papagenos is doing that other insiders aren't...if someone could clarify I'll take it back, not trying to seem like a jerk or anything!
Well, you're not wrong.
I'm trying to take what every insider says seriously, Papagenos included. Everyone seems pretty adament about being right, so I don't doubt for a minute that most of these guys have a lot of faith in their sources.
That being said, I don't see how people can attack other insiders for being wrong with this leak and then turn right around and claim Papagenos knows what he's talking about. Aside from where he stands on the leak, how is he different than any other insider who we've recently deemed as crazy and unreliable?
Maybe Papageno's source is bigger than I realize, but he did admit that this person was a fairly new source for him. Compare that to the insiders who have sources who have already proven multiple times that they know what they're talking about. I feel like this is something people should acknowledge more often, especially if they want to use Papagenos as evidence for this being real.
Papagenos is nice, and I'm sure he thinks his source is honest. It's just that I don't know what else this person has gotten correct before. Until I do, I honestly can't put too much credit into what the source says, or at the very least, not as much as the other guys who've already proven themselves.