Tansut said:Nope, but I would like to emphasize that I never said it was Nintendo specifically that was annoyed by whichever leak it is. Saw that being thrown in with what I said so I wanted to clear that up.
Well well wellTansut said:Alright. It's Friday and I feel like the clock is ticking until we get legitimate new stuff to talk about anyway...
It was NOT Nintendo that had some internal discussion / annoyance / whatever about a leak. I mean maybe they did separately, but I'm not aware of it if that's the case.
I feel like this confirms Vergeben's stance on there being a rep from that company but, as I've said, I don't know ANYTHING about what the leak is. Whether it's public or in private circles, whether it's a video / picture / text, etc. This also leads me to believe which character it is based on the glut of leaks (fake or otherwise) surrounding them, but I really hate outright guessing because I still legitimately have no actual knowledge of which character it is.
So y'all can assume or get hype at your own discretion, but that's pretty much all I know. Everything else is guesswork.
It could end up being Geno. The last (perhaps only?) character hinted at by Tansut was Cloud. He said he has an idea of who the character might be based on where he heard info from. It's possible his source isn't from Nintendo, but from Square.
He doesn't know which leak it is, but thinks he knows which character it is. This stands to reason it's one that has shown up in several alleged "leaks", such as Geno. He talks about internal discussion, ruffled feathers, and refers to the company as "they", but he never name-drops Nintendo. He eliminated the Ken leak from consideration, which would make sense given Square employees wouldn't likely have much knowledge of that.
If he's not lying, it seems possible. But it's just a theory.