D
Deleted member
Guest
"All these theories are false so this one must be false too"Please explain how it doesn't? This is only a theory too, is it not? How would an argument against theories not apply against a theory?
"Because it would need to" implies it needs to change when that's 100% speculation.Because it would need to? I don't see how this is evidence that my point is invalid. That's assuming that this was a pattern designed for only two more in the first place, which to my knowledge, has no evidence that it is other than speculation, which is not fact and can still be argued against as much as it can be for.
Also, explain to me why would anyone design something with a clear intent of it being final to then just go back and change it.
You believe the current box we know of was made from scratch. It clearly wasn't.In that case, could the box not be designed the way it is because not everyone is revealed yet? Claiming it is the way it is because Isabelle hadn't been revealed yet only implies that this was specifically designed not to give anything away, and giving stuff away is the core argument of this theory
Its final design was made, and THEN they removed the unrevealed characters.
Isabelle was removed because she had yet to be announced but nothing was changed or moved.