He posted earlier in this thread “You should speak to me, KingAce, or even Iliad for help with pools and brackets.” And yet you didn’t. And what happened? Players who had no right to even place as high as they did, somehow came within grasp of the prize pool. While players like TOJoe are facing Hype second round of winners? That never happens, EVER. I don’t care if he had a poor seed in his pool, he could be moved to an equivalent area where he’s not playing someone from the same region or more or less equal skill level.
idk second round of winners seems like a reasonable place for a match between two great players of more or less equal skill level, given that one of them seeded poorly in his pool. Of course, the pools should have been more equal. So how did that happen?
It's wrong for pools to be hand-selected by a small group of people from one region -- obvious biases will be obvious. But using region alone is not enough to determine the pools, and it wouldn't balance them well. But we need something more transparent than "some dude's opinion", and local PR's can sometimes be as bad.
What is the right way to put pools together? I'm not convinced "Mikey's opinion" is the best metric, but I'm not sure how it's done.
I've been to tourneys where everyone was randomly assigned to an opponent, three times, and at each iteration you're assigned to someone with the same number of wins/losses thus far. This was used to seed the pools or brackets. It's sort of an "iterative pool" that moves you into a pool where skills are more equal. I conjecture that this would be at
least as fair for setting up pools as the current "someone makes it up". And with pre-reg these matches could have been mostly set up to start happening as soon as people were allowed into the venue...... idk just an idea and prolly doesn't scale well to this size of tourney or something, but I'm wondering how we can get something more "concrete" than the current system.
At LEAST there should be public justification for why the pools are the way they are. How are people from "nether-regions" (ex. Waterloo) being assigned to pools??
For a tournament that consisted primarily of smash players, we saw little priority in the announcement of our matches, and saw very little of it streamed.
What are you talking about? Matches were being announced through the mic at the front all the time, he was calling ppl who were late or w/e. And the stream was doing Brawl like the whole time. In fact there were many opportunities when it was just available for anyone to sit down there and play matches (even friendlies) and have them streamed. The stream had very little to do with the venue, aside from how LBT helped out in every way possible to make it happen and epic and projector'd and whatnot. 'sides that stream was all me/annsy because we wanted it and brought it; if you want to stream or record matches you can do it yourself bro.
As for the low turnout for brawl: the reason is because the Brawl community is
closed. Did anyone think about advertising for it outside of smashboards??? There are tons of ppl who enjoy Brawl and would want to get competitive in it but they never ever hear about tourneys. AAND when they do come to tourneys, some ppl are intimidating jerks that lol @ them for not knowing which stages are arbitrarily banned, or how stage-striking works, or w/e. BAWRL WILL DIE IF WE DON'T INVITE AND ENCOURAGE NEW PPL TO COME OUT!
This brings me to something else I really think should happen:
Amateur bracket: After pools, use the pool results to place all the people who didn't make it out of pools, into their own 32-person bracket. This means it's not worthless for the less-hardcore ppl to come out to the tourney, and encourages them to get better, and it would also help us rate these people better so we can make better pools in future tourneys. Note that there were a number of solid players who didn't make it out of pools
Yes obviously that means I'd encourage more
2-day tourneys, and if it's gonna be 1-day then we should do things Bawrl-only (sorry Melee/Bawrl+/SFIV I <3 u guys, but obv we were lacking setups all day).
As for security......... the TO should have assigned someone to each pool, both to watch the matches / control DQ's etc. nonsense, as well as to be responsible for the setups. Then after pools, have some dedicated station-areas where matches are assigned.
I had a great time at the tourney tho, learning experience for sure. The venue was quite nice it's just too bad the food deal was an absolute failure, and there were too many games for the amount of organization effort.