god i hate long posts with multiple quotes
Nononono I did not just answer my own question. I didn't ask if your read was strong enough I asked you to list them and you said no. You just did so without saying and it's bugging me as to why you did that. Wth do you mean you don't have quotes or anything to pick and choose from to paint Joey as scum because there are definite posts that you could see as scumJoey because I see them myself. What do you mean vibes? That just sounds like a bunch of bull to skate around the fact of calling someone scummy and not leaving a trace.
Yes, you did. I don't have strong enough feelings about them to list them in any sort of scummy order. That's all there is to it. As usual, you're looking too hard into things to try to find scumminess that isn't there.
Way to cop out.....you can still express an opinion on someone by reading. Have you ever replaced into a game? If you did so and used that excuse to not have a read on anyone you would be lynched super quick. There is info and you just are shrugging away at it which I don't like at all.
Well, if you know me, then you'll know that I'll already have to do a reread to find this supposed info I'm shrugging away. All I'm saying is that nothing STOOD OUT TO ME as strongly scummy or towny from these players. I gave you my opinions on them, but at that point couldn't put them in a list for you. Big deal.
AM wasn't being hypocritical but you were trying to twist his words to make it seem they were being hypocritical which is discrediting them and their arguement. You continue to discredit them in this post as well a but more down. The thing is, is that you are continuing the joke to stress the point that I am not believeable regardless of what I may be which can paint someone in a bad light and make certain people not trust that person anymore. Why continue it besides to "joke" and make me look worse? What do you gain from doing so?
Nope, he was being hypocritical.
"
meta isn't a solid tell because they can change game-to-game"
followed by
"policy lynch this person because she is inactive, and
even if she's active she won't do us much good"
(I pointed it out in 219, then AM instantly retaliates)
The bolded is meta. The "inactive" part was what AM defended against. "Inactive" isn't even a large part of what I was going for. He thinks she won't be a good player in general based on META. It was his ONLY reasoning for voting her. I was pointing out HYPOCRISY.
Wow you need to go back and read. Please do then get back to me cuz why I think you are scum should be pretty obvious at this point. Don't strawman me! haha~ ^^
Typical me :/
You are discrediting the entire thing AM had to say about you to simple OMGUS which is just not true at all. Once again, you are strawmanning the main point of the arguement to the easiest sense in which you can attack it. Why? Go back and actually look at why they are calling you out as scum.
I wanted him to respond to this, not you.
Lol do not redirect this to Joey Asdioh.
How do you feel about dieing duder?
I'm not redirecting. Just saying how he asked a meta question, and I responded saying
1. based on meta, I think Smarg is towny
2. your reasonings for thinking she is scum in the first place are crappy
Then people like you and AM jump on me for using meta.
more to come in hopefully a smaller post while I read the new stuff -_-