See, I never denied it's popularity at any given time. I'm saying now, here in the pesent day, it ain't popular, man. Hence the reason I said that I could walk out on the street and people would assume I'm on drugs if I asked them which they'd prefer get a character in Brawl, Zelda or Earthbound. Earthbound was a potentially good game. I've never played it, but it may have been good. And like most good games, it had it's prime point. For Earthbound, it was probably sometime ago in Japan. Not globally, but in Japan solely.
And surely you read all of my last statement and not a cursory glance. Oh no, that'd be irresponsible. I said that yeah, you can make a character stronger, but why one that is one of the least popular characters in the game? Everyone seems to think popular characters should be in, so that's the basis I'm standing on now. Ness was good. People liked him. Now, Ness is bad. Lots of people don't like him.
Now, what you said about the whole 3 pages in wiki is true. It just means they have a little less information on them. But wait...who would you say has more information game-wise, Ness, a MAIN CHARACTER, or FD Link, an "option", a "bonus", a "side-quest"?