Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't think anyone would mind ahahah.Anyone care if I jump into this lifeless thread with my 2 cents?
He really doesnt. SHTL can apply a lot of little damage to him while hes approaching you. When he nados, you can just full hop and shine stall through it. And mk dies at like 80ish% from usmash (idk the actual percent but its between 80 and 90). Also fox is a fast faller and can live quite a bit longer than mk, with some good di. He also has a lot of good mixup options with grabs and tilts and dairs. I would say where the MU really falls out of foxs favour is when he gets below the stage. In the same way that marth beats him out recovering from below, mk can do it even better. Alll he really has to do is jump near the edge and dair or nair, since foxs side b doesnt have a meteor hit like wolfs or falcos, and his up b doesnt have much of a stage spiking threat, like wolfs. I would say that foxs fair gives him the best chance of getting back even with the stage, and then he could shine stall and try and mix up his landing, and in this respect maybe mix up his overall recovery different from how wolf or falco might, but even still against a high level mk youll probably die regardless. Thats just my opinion from my standpoint, having never actually played a high level mk, and not really being a high level fox. If wusi or somebody would get on here itd be a lot better ha.Fox doesn't get bodied by MK at all ...
I mean if no one's going to stop meI don't think anyone would mind ahahah.
Shoryuken?I mean if no one's going to stop me
Anyone care to explain why we're still ranking Luigi over PT?
The one no one has used in Years?Shoryuken?
I'd say it's probably because of fatigue and the type weaknesses that hold the pokemon back. Aside from squirtle, the other two tend to get beaten out by a vast majority of the cast and can't really hold themselves close up or far away whereas Luigi has trouble getting in but once he does he can actually be really scary haha.I mean if no one's going to stop me
Anyone care to explain why we're still ranking Luigi over PT?
Actually I have heard that charizard can somewhat hold his own in a few MUs, but does this substantiate them being better than Luigi?Charizard has a handful of not-terrible MUs imo, even with fatigue in account.
http://www.ssbwiki.com/Momentum_CancellingHe really doesnt. SHTL can apply a lot of little damage to him while hes approaching you. When he nados, you can just full hop and shine stall through it. And mk dies at like 80ish% from usmash (idk the actual percent but its between 80 and 90). Also fox is a fast faller and can live quite a bit longer than mk, with some good di. He also has a lot of good mixup options with grabs and tilts and dairs. I would say where the MU really falls out of foxs favour is when he gets below the stage. In the same way that marth beats him out recovering from below, mk can do it even better. Alll he really has to do is jump near the edge and dair or nair, since foxs side b doesnt have a meteor hit like wolfs or falcos, and his up b doesnt have much of a stage spiking threat, like wolfs. I would say that foxs fair gives him the best chance of getting back even with the stage, and then he could shine stall and try and mix up his landing, and in this respect maybe mix up his overall recovery different from how wolf or falco might, but even still against a high level mk youll probably die regardless. Thats just my opinion from my standpoint, having never actually played a high level mk, and not really being a high level fox. If wusi or somebody would get on here itd be a lot better ha.
Honestly, I'm not sure. 6 years in and I never figured out how Luigi works.Actually I have heard that charizard can somewhat hold his own in a few MUs, but does this substantiate them being better than Luigi?
You are displaying an extreme lack of knowledge about LuigiThe one no one has used in Years?
Im curious with chocos success in Japan if theres a reason you have her ranked in C?I think as far as the viability of characters is concerned we should center 90% of our considerations around how a character does against MK + ICs. The better a character does against both of them, the more we should be inclined to disregard other, realistically meaningless soft-counters. As a an example I'd like to use this personal opinion of mine: Falco and Snake are better characters than Diddy Kong and Olimar. Snake is one of the few characters who can legit beat both characters on every legal stage and Falco is arguably MKs hardest matchup [take that as you will]. Diddy and Olimar both have solid disadvantages on every stage against MK + ICs which I think is worse than Falco getting ***** by one [IC] but doing fine against the other [MK]. I think Falco is a fantastic character with an amazing matchup spread, beating most characters and only really losing to ICs and Pikachu.
Neither Diddy nor Olimar can be the 3rd best character at this point in my book. In addition to their MK+IC issue, they lack advantageous matchups against all the other high tier characters except Pikachu.
S:
A:
B:
C:
All the other characters are to all intents and purposes irrelevant in singles.
It's v115 though. Who will forever play ZSS in everything.You are displaying an extreme lack of knowledge about Luigi
Except Smash 4It's v115 though. Who will forever play ZSS in everything.
Is he not going to?Except Smash 4
Only if I get to be the judge.I think truth and karaoke man should have a battle of theorycrafting and the winner gets to decide the tierlist
I mean hes still pretty high. Compared to...well...PT. lol.can dedede go back to being top tier again?
You left out an "i".I mean hes still pretty high. Compared to...well...PT. lol.
Actually he's too slow. If Falco (or Pikachu) had Dedede's weight but kept all their other attributes they would probably have slightly better MUs only cuz they'd be harder to kill but still be able to do what they do to MK - imagine if MK had to be build Falco to like 160% for every KO.Mmm i know vex has beaten some mks, but no one of like top caliber like zero. Not that it matters now...lol. but yeah its next to impossible to beat a really good mk with DDD. Hes just too fat
Oh I guess you're right. I should've remembered that there are characters that are just big-bonedHeavy =/= fat
OH MY GOD GHEB this isn't Tumblr we don't need to be ****ing politically correct or any bull**** like that as far as Smash is concerned heavy = fat.Heavy =/= fat
Technically it MIGHT because they aren't sent as far at low percents thus leaving them more vulnerable to follow ups.Uhh, I think you should also include SIZE of the characters into that. Flatly increasing someone's weight doesn't make them more comboable, it just makes them not die.
HahB: Fox
I think fox and wolf are about even.My end of 2014 Tier List would look something like this (Not really ordered in Tiers):
[Assuming 3-7 Stages legal]
S: MK/ICs
A: Diddy/Snake/Falco
B: Marth/Olimar/ZSS/Pikachu/Fox/Wario
C: DDD/Wolf/Pit/Peach/Lucario
Do not care: Rest