B0NK
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,282
I don't think Olimar loses to MK harder. It's about the same when the MK knows the match up. ICs lose worse if the MK bothered to learn the SoPo match up, but MKs rarely bothered to learn any match up so why would I expect that.Olimar is bodied by ICs and loses to MK harder than ICs. Olimar also loses to Falco while ICs crush him.
And the rest of the cast you didn't mention. There's a reason you have Delux saying **** like "I can't beat GnW and D3 with ICs," it's harder than it looks when a player bothers to learn ICs game.Olimar does better against Pikachu and Snake, and I guess ZSS? That's basically it.
I'd expect ICs to do better than Oli with those stagelist and when the best Olimar players don't show up too.ICs also historically place better than Olimars. SKTAR 3, Apex 2014 are two notable examples that are recent.
ICs > Olimar.
It's gr8 cause I've seen IC mains say it's an even match up. I don't believe that, but I do believe going only Olimar is much more effective than going only ICs in tournaments.MK/ICs MUs is a large factor in how I look at the tier lists, because if you can't beat the character who zero-deaths you for free, you're hosed, and if you can't beat the best character in the game, you're hosed. I don't mean a winning MU, I just mean keep up enough to try to get a victory. That's why I specifically referenced ICs vs Olimar - it's a key MU that Olimar loses.
But then again, you don't believe Olimar does better than ICs in most match ups so I can see where you're coming from. I just disagree with you.
Nah I lived in two areas where people bother to learn the ICs match-up. There were other regions that did too, then those regions stop playing Brawl around the end of 2011 because P:M was out and popular and MK was still not banned.Unless you live in an area where they ban handoffs and whatnot - then yeah, I can see why ICs are lower on your list.
Also I probably think ICs win more match ups then you think, but I also think Olimar does better than you think in all match ups across the board.
If you're going to have MK be legal, I believe you shouldn't be tailoring a ruleset to make him bearable to most people. If you don't believe MK is broken enough to be banned, then leave the stagelist the same as it once was.You mention making it for a ruleset you agree with, but it's about the current ruleset, not the ruleset you'd like to see - or else for some, MK wouldn't appear on the list... and that list would be inaccurate because it wouldn't factor him in. The same issue applies here.
The current ruleset is "We admit MK is broken, but we don't want him banned cause that wouldn't be fair to my MK friends that never bothered to learn another character."
I will never agree with that ruleset. Also I don't believe and MK banned tier list would look any different than mine if you took MK off my list. Can't really say the same about other list.
People started to believe ICs were in their own tier as other not MK maining top players either quit or just used MK shortly after 2011. Also during the end of 2011 stagelist were made in heavy favoritism for ICs.
If you guys didn't want to play ICs game, you shouldn't have buffed them by removing all the stages. Playing against MK on Rainbow Cruise is more fun than playing against ICs on FD.
Playing as or against ICs is nothing like any other match up in the game, it's a very boring match up to watch and play. I personally am very happy ICs aren't in Smash 4, so we don't have to deal with a character that doesn't play Brawl. ICs play "who's going to screw up or choke first."
#afk