hiROI
Smash Lord
I believe Daisy could have a spot. They can make a completely new style, she does not have to be a clone of Peach
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nah, her only non-spinoff appearance was Super Mario Land.I believe Daisy could have a spot. They can make a completely new style, she does not have to be a clone of Peach
Dunno about Wobuffet, but Pokemon will probably get a new rep. And as for Fire Emblem, it should be a new lord or Roy.Seriously should add Wobbuffet to the brawl.
Black Knight, of course.
Yeah, Mario being the face of Nintendo and of gaming in general, it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. I do think new series should take some priority, though. Yeah, I guess we'll need both.I wouldn't be surprised if they do get a new Mario char since he is so popular but I wouldn't mind either way as long as Mario, Zelda and Pokemon stay at the top and I do think reping new ones (it would be better with both though).
I believe Daisy could have a spot. They can make a completely new style, she does not have to be a clone of Peach
That doesn't really mean much. Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario, two of the most supported characters, only have three game appearances each (non-spinoff). Waluigi, another character with a lot of support, has zero.Nah, her only non-spinoff appearance was Super Mario Land.
Well, unlike Daisy, Paper Mario was the main character in all of his games. He's also well-liked, and he has a living series where he'll keep getting roles. Bowser Jr... that's true, but being a main antagonist in all of them is good. And Waluigi just shouldn't be in.That doesn't really mean much. Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario, two of the most supported characters, only have three game appearances each (non-spinoff). Waluigi, another character with a lot of support, has zero.
Well Paper Mario and Bowser Jr. have appeared in more canon games (In Paper Mario's case, his own series.) in 9 years than Daisy has in her 15+ years of being around.That doesn't really mean much. Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario, two of the most supported characters, only have three game appearances each (non-spinoff). Waluigi, another character with a lot of support, has zero.
Thank you! Paper Mario is so awesome.Well Paper Mario and Bowser Jr. have appeared in more canon games (In Paper Mario's case, his own series.) in 9 years than Daisy has in her 15+ years of being around.
Point.Well Paper Mario and Bowser Jr. have appeared in more canon games (In Paper Mario's case, his own series.) in 9 years than Daisy has in her 15+ years of being around.
Even then I think she wouldn't have good chances simply because of her being so unimportant, I'd rather see other female characters like Barbara the Bat or Lip in before Daisy should ever be thought of getting in.Point.
Daisy probably won't be in, and shouldn't. If she gets in, she'll probably be a clone of Peach. The only way she'll get in is if Sakurai/new director of Smash decides that more female characters should be in.
And putting in characters because they're female makes no sense. We should put in the characters with significance and popularity. The only females who really deserve to get in right now are LipPoint.
Daisy probably won't be in, and shouldn't. If she gets in, she'll probably be a clone of Peach. The only way she'll get in is if Sakurai/new director of Smash decides that more female characters should be in.
That doesn't mean anything in Super Smash Bros. Captain Falcon had a completely original moveset, as he stayed in a car in his game.Now you're just being ignorant. Paper Mario has never thrown a fireball, whipped a cape or used a water gun. Paper Mario has many unique abilities like hammering, Spin Dashing, Ultra/Spring Jumping and flipping. And generic cloned punches and kicks aren't conducive to a character who tends to rely on his partners.
No, Fire Emblem needs a villain, as do all the other franchises in Smash. Also, Roy doesn't need to return. He was an advert for the release of Fire Emblem for the GBA.And as for Fire Emblem, it should be a new lord or Roy.
I guess he could be a clone. That would make me very angry, though, since he wouldn't make any sense as a clone of Mario.That doesn't mean anything in Super Smash Bros. Captain Falcon had a completely original moveset, as he stayed in a car in his game.
Paper Mario does have potential, but him being a "clone" of Mario is possible, and could happen.
Having villians is well and good, but not for the sake of being villians. Now that I think about it, Black Knight has the popularity and the games...hmm... and as for Roy, I guess he could be replaced with any lord, preferably a new one. So between Black Knight and a new lord for the new Fire Emblem rep.No, Fire Emblem needs a villain, as do all the other franchises in Smash. Also, Roy doesn't need to return. He was an advert for the release of Fire Emblem for the GBA.
Marth was the character Sakurai planned for Melee- Roy was put in because he had time to create new characters, or a lot of clones.
I guess he could be a clone. That would make me very angry, though, since he wouldn't make any sense as a clone of Mario.
If you read what i said you'd see that i said paper mario doesn't have to be a clone. I personally think they are totally different characters and that if paper mario was in he should be a spin off character like yoshi and wario. I'm not being ignorant, i'm having a different viewpoint.Now you're just being ignorant. Paper Mario has never thrown a fireball, whipped a cape or used a water gun. Paper Mario has many unique abilities like hammering, Spin Dashing, Ultra/Spring Jumping and flipping. And generic cloned punches and kicks aren't conducive to a character who tends to rely on his partners.
Yes, I guess Toad is third as of now, but we don't need to bring in more than two new Mario characters. And I agree that Paper Mario should be represented as a different series than regular Mario, because of how different Paper Mario is from mainstream Mario.If you read what i said you'd see that i said paper mario doesn't have to be a clone. I personally think they are totally different characters and that if paper mario was in he should be a spin off character like yoshi and wario. I'm not being ignorant, i'm having a different viewpoint.
Even with Paper mario as a contender for a mario spot, toad is still third. Bowser jr. currently has a better shot because he is more current. But still, toad has had more chance than others. Toad has been in all spin offs and is more important than Waluigi and Daisy. Toad is less Generic than goombas piantas and nokis because there was originally one toad.
Toad is third for smash, which is pretty good. If paper mario gets his own little spin off spot like he should then Toad is second. I predict two more mario characters in the next game So toad has a good chance soon.
As for why there will be two more characters, The big three needs to stay high above the rest to prevent less important series from getting the same amount. This means more series can have more characters and keep the ratio the same.
Sakurai isn't really dumb with roster choices, he just picks strange characters.Yes, I guess Toad is third as of now, but we don't need to bring in more than two new Mario characters. And I agree that Paper Mario should be represented as a different series than regular Mario, because of how different Paper Mario is from mainstream Mario.
I personally don't want the outdated "Toad" at all, but Sakurai being dumb with roster choices means he has a chance.
I guess so... why bring in a third Star Fox rep, not put in Ridley, take out Mewtwo, etc.Sakurai isn't really dumb with roster choices, he just picks strange characters.
It was Mewtwo or Jigglypuff if I remember correctly, so he chose Jigglypuff, which is a good choice.I guess so... why bring in a third Star Fox rep, not put in Ridley, take out Mewtwo, etc.
☆ Wolf is the **** that's why. Ridley is a broken Charizard, and Mewtwo would be Uber broken in Brawl since they messed him up in Melee.[/Joke Post] ☆I guess so... why bring in a third Star Fox rep, not put in Ridley, take out Mewtwo, etc.
Bringing back a really old quote in response to one of my posts.Yeah he should. And it isn't because Ridley is epic...well, he is, but it isn't my reason. Metroid has been under-repped for...what...7-8 years? That's why we also need Goroh. Badly.
But anyway, despite opinions I've heard on BOTH games, I think Camus would be an entertaining Fire Emblem rep. I don't expect him to be on a HORSE or anything, but the Gradivus Lance looks like it could be fun in smash. REALLY fun.
I might even enter Camus in MYM5 now that I thought of it.
Pokemon, Mario, and LoZ are at the point where they either need to switch out reps, or add another row to the roster so they all get one. I think adding another row works better, because of one thing: Every mario rep is VERY important.
EDIT: I would prefer Darkurai over a 5th gen legendary, IMO. And on a side note, to the guy who said Rayquaza should be a pokeball pokemon.......I can see him as doing nothing more than what Onix did in 64, but with energy balls instead of boulders.
Symbol could be a star, since the Mario RPGs have lots of stars in them. We have the Star Pieces, the Beanstar, the Cobalt Star, the Star Spirits and the Crystal Stars. If they want to be recent, or they think a star would be too generic, it could be a heart (Pure Hearts from SPM) even if SPM was easily the worst Paper Mario.☆ Paper Mario's move set's would most likely be form Paper Mario Thousand Year Door since that's were most of the awesome attacks came from like Super Nova, (that could be his Final Smash). As for his emblem, I don't think it would change from the Mushroom since he is Mario and Paper Mario is a Mario game, lol. ☆
Some good points here. But you can't say a character isn't well-known enough to be in. The Ice Climbers were hardly known before Melee came out, Pit had kind of faded into obscurity prior to his appearance in Brawl, and Captain Falcon himself isn't very well known.Bringing back a really old quote in response to one of my posts.
Just because Metroid and F-Zero are under-repped doesn't mean you should just grab any old character and throw them in. They aren't under-repped because Nintendo doesn't feel like it, they're under-repped because they don't have any more suitable/popular enough characters.
Ridley should always be huge, around the size he was in Brawl, therefore he'd never work as a character. If anything Dark Samus would be more fitting (perhaps a faster, heavier Samus with less powerful projectiles and more Phazon/psychic-like moves.) The most popular other F-Zero characters are Black Shadow, Samurai Goro, and Blood Falcon. Blood Falcon is already an alternate costume, and the other two characters I just don't think are well known enough to be included, although I could see Black Shadow being in and taking Ganondorf's moveset, and giving Ganondorf a totally unique moveset.
I believe Ness was planned to be replaced by Lucas in Melee, right? So the original 12 isn't automatically into a new game. Of course, now they've all been in three games, not one, so their resumes are a bit longer.Well due to Captain Falcon himself not being very well-known, I think that's why they aren't pushing to put more F-Zero characters in. As far as Ice Climbers and Pit, even characters like Game & Watch, I think those characters are all along the lines of Captain Falcon. The main protagonist of a not very well-known game/franchise.
Heck, if Falcon wasn't one of the original 12, and didn't become his own kind of celebrity through the Smash Bros. series, he might not even be in the games anymore. It's kind of like Jigglypuff. There are plenty of Pokemon I'd rather have in the game, but Jiggs is a classic, and will probably always be a part of the series.
Although then again he wouldn't, because they seem to be trying to pull atleast one character from every Nintendo franchise possible.
I like Jiggs being there and all, but i gladly replace her with Meowth. i always thought he deserved a spot. Jigglypuff's popularity and placement in Smash Bros. was based off her role in the anime anyways, and Meowth's role in the anime is much bigger.Heck, if Falcon wasn't one of the original 12, and didn't become his own kind of celebrity through the Smash Bros. series, he might not even be in the games anymore. It's kind of like Jigglypuff. There are plenty of Pokemon I'd rather have in the game, but Jiggs is a classic, and will probably always be a part of the series.
.
But really, all Sakurai did (In terms of Vs. mode) was fix what people complained about and added tripping.
Sakurai can be a disappointment sometimes, but he should stay the director. Smash just isn't Smash without him. He's really the only one who knows the series and how to continue it.One thing I've wanted to get people's opinions on is whether or not they want Sakurai directing SSB4. Some people refer to Brawl as a big mistake, and hate Sakurai for it. Personally, I think his only real mistake was tripping. Brawl is what it is because people complained about what Melee was.
You do realize that when he's on the ground, he's about Bowser's height.
Ridley should always be huge, around the size he was in Brawl, therefore he'd never work as a character.
What? A clone of Samus? Sounds like you want them to take Samus, do the wonderful transformation they played on Lucas and Wolf and pop out Dark samus.Bringing back a really old quote in response to one of my posts.
Ridley should always be huge, around the size he was in Brawl, therefore he'd never work as a character. If anything Dark Samus would be more fitting (perhaps a faster, heavier Samus with less powerful projectiles and more Phazon/psychic-like moves.) .
yeah... that makes me sad =(Unless people really whine about Mewtwo being gone, Lucario will probably be replaced by some other popular new pokemon.