I was nodding while reading all of the first party characters, then when I got down to Cloud and Nightmare I was likeHere's what I'd want in Smash 4:
snip
snip
snip
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I was nodding while reading all of the first party characters, then when I got down to Cloud and Nightmare I was likeHere's what I'd want in Smash 4:
snip
snip
snip
Sorry, I saw this and I just finished watching the final samurai jack episode just last night. (I have all 4 seasons, yay)no, samurai jack is by far the best part.....god i miss that show
on a different note, i really think the yoshi and donkey kong series deserve more representation. Bowser jr. is originally from a yoshi game as is kamek and the baby bros. All of whom i think would make great characters. As for dk i would love to see k rool, funky, dixie, lanky and chunky be added. funky and chunky could easily be implemented as alt coustues, and the others have plently of potential movesets.
Interesting idea.I was thinking that a Team based mode would fit nicely into Smash. It would work like Capcom v. SNK 2. You pick three characters and you switch automatically when one character is KO'd. It wouldn't be the main mode of play but it might be worth implementing.
For example:
Pick Meta Knight, Donkey Kong and Falco.
Meta Knight starts the fight. If he is KO'd, DK takes over. If he's KO'd, Falco takes over.
It works well with 3-stock matches but can also work well for 4-stock if you stick with 3-character teams. In 4-stock, you'd get to use the first character twice. Logically, your first character would be your best or most dependable character.
A Marvel v. Capcom 2 style team match wouldn't work as well since assists and switches are difficult to implement into Smash.
Just a thought...
If it was like Tekken, would it require tokens? lolWell, I'd want to have presets on who's playing who. Like before the match each player would pick their character. Sucks for the person whos short on odd numbered teams, haha [3 vs 3, 5 vs 5] I think It would be a great idea if you could pick how many characters you ill play with in this "team battle". Maybe 2- 6?
Sort of like Tekken style team battle.
You forgot to include Mach Rider and Saki Amamiya. D;-Ilex's post of awesomeness-
Oh, he's only been in one game, huh?this is not the point, Geno has only been in ONE freakin game and you think he should be in? i think not, there are other "way more" deserving characters
such as Megaman, Bomberman who have had numerous games on Nintendo rather than Geno that only appeared in one
as for you saying Geno GOD TIER!? psss... probably in your dreams because he would be mid if not bottom but then again it wouldn't matter because Geno shouldn't be in smash!
The reason he's popular is because there was one Geno supporter that made some good points which convinced about 1 million people to jump on the Geno bandwagon who would not have wanted him otherwise. Ice Climbers are part of the Old School characters, and is a familiar icon to all the old NES players. And he's Nintendo. Geno is a character that appeared in one game and isn't even Nintendo. I never even knew who he was until I saw all the posts orgasming about how they wanted him. I'd love to see these great arguments for Geno, actually. Because he's popular? Because he's a star possessing a doll? Or maybe it's because he...yeah. I'm stumped.Oh, he's only been in one game, huh?
Who freaking cares?! The Ice Climbers have only been in one game, but look! Besides that he is also considered second party. There was a thread which gave great reasons why Geno should've been in Brawl.
Also, if Geno is sooo undeserving, how come he came in the top 10 most wanted for Brawl?
Your points are so weak I laugh at them so much.
Or how about we give them BOTH awesome movesets? I don't see why everyone wants to give Black Shadow Ganondorf's moveset, aren't we against clones? Pretty much everyone hates Ganondorf's moveset as it is, BS shouldn't have to be stuck with that.Imo, they should give Black Shadow Ganondorf's complete moveset and give Ganondorf a unique, fresh moveset. The way he was supposed to be from the start.
For Star Fox, it seems that Smash has been following the two teams; Star Fox and Star Wolf. First we have Star Fox Leader, then Star Fox sidekick, then Star Wolf Leader, and it would make sense in SSB4 to have a Star Wolf sidekick to complete the pattern. Slippy would make a good AT, and I don't really care about Krystal. Maybe Ike could stay...but I'm pretty positive that TL and Lucario will be taken out and replaced with newer versions of themselves.Yay, another Tingle supporter! Personally, I want Toon Link back in with a fresh set of B moves, or Young Link with Mask Transformations (Zora Link, FTW!), Vaati, and Phantom Ganon for a boss. For Kirby, I think Paint Roller or Shadow Kirby would be nice choices, and Nightmare for a boss. For Star Fox, I want Krystal and Slippy (Slippy effing makes the Arwings and LandMasters, why not?), and Andross for a boss. I don't want Lucario replaced; he's fine as the 4th gen rep. I want Gardevoir in. For Fire Emblem, DEFINITELY keep Ike. Ike is just as important as Marth is. For the other Fire Emblem rep, I want Eliwood, Micaiah, or Sigurd, and either Medeus, Idoun, or the Fire Dragon (Demon King is g0d-m0d).
It would be like CvS2. Two players, each picking a team of three. Doing this as multiplayer teams wouldn't work well since if one player dominates, the other wouldn't get to play. :/Interesting idea.
Would the one player play as the switching character, or would a second player (teammate) play next?
-t2
DK... simply a Mario SPINOFF????????????? RAAAGGGHHH!!!I think we should look at past trends to see which series will have new characters and how many new characters there will be. Most of my predictions are based off of Spire III's SSB4 Character Choice Battle in Forum Games.
Here are some little facts about my list:
- Wario is included as both a Mario spinoff character and a new series character
- Fire emblem characters are included under new series and their own category.
DK: 0 or +1 (0,+1)
Yoshi: 0 (0,0)
Mario spinoffs altogether: +1 (0,+2)
This includes DK, Yoshi and Wario. If it gets +1 rep, I hope that it is a Yoshi representative. So I say it will most likely be Kamek or Baby Mario Bros.
geno was not the title character.Oh, he's only been in one game, huh?
Who freaking cares?! The Ice Climbers have only been in one game, but look! Besides that he is also considered second party. There was a thread which gave great reasons why Geno should've been in Brawl.
Also, if Geno is sooo undeserving, how come he came in the top 10 most wanted for Brawl?
Your points are so weak I laugh at them so much.
The beauty of Smash is that you can have all sorts of diverse characters fighting each other. Honestly, who doesn't love seeing Jigglypuff beat the crap out of Bowser or Marth?About art direction, do you think if we have more third parties or first parties, should this game be more about realistic characters (Snake) or very cute cartoony ones (Kirby, Jigglypuff) or ones in between (Ike, Marth)?
Do you think there should be more realistic and serious characters in Smash or it should be more childish like? I don't know which is best for sales.
I know. It is cute seeing Jigglypuff beat up Snake as well. I just don't like it when people say there should be no realistic characters like Snake because he "doesn't fit" in Smash.The beauty of Smash is that you can have all sorts of diverse characters fighting each other. Honestly, who doesn't love seeing Jigglypuff beat the crap out of Bowser or Marth?
Not possible unless the Wii completely fails and Nintendo is forced to become a third-party software developer. I don't see this happening in the foreseeable future.I'd make it for the X-box or PS3, lets face it, the Wii is too wiik to handle SSB's full potential.
Thats the beauty of smash.I have a question for all of you.
What art direction and music style should SSB4 take?
About art direction, do you think if we have more third parties or first parties, should this game be more about realistic characters (Snake) or very cute cartoony ones (Kirby, Jigglypuff) or ones in between (Ike, Marth)?
Do you think there should be more realistic and serious characters in Smash or it should be more childish like? I don't know which is best for sales.
About music direction, how should it be? More operatic like this one or more rock and roll type? It seems better being epic, but some parts like my idea about Lucas killing Claus (who is a boss character) then finding out he's his brother then Claus dies and Lucas is sad could really make the player cry and the MOTHER 3 Theme of Love would play, but it should be like LOTR style with Enya-ish type music but sad.
It could also work about the dramatic part I suggested where the female Earthbound rep would be bleeding from the forehead and praying then she passes out and almost dies till Ness comes and saves her could also have this type of music.
I also think the 'main' music theme should not be played throughout the whole game, but rather different music all the time. It may be harder yes, but I don't like to hear the same melody in different styles all the time.
ROFLNot possible unless the Wii completely fails and Nintendo is forced to become a third-party software developer. I don't see this happening in the foreseeable future.
Yes to Masked Man. Where have you been anyway, wanna talk on AIM?Masked Man, Masked Man, Masked Man. :bigthumbu
...Oh, yeah, and better online wouldn't hurt.![]()
Do you mean Masked Man as a Boss or as a PC?Yes to Masked Man. Where have you been anyway, wanna talk on AIM?
or mabey mario is a spinof of DK, wasnt the arcade game called donkey kong? not mario.Mario is a DK spinoff. Remember the arcade game, guys? Hehe
That was my point. Mario was in Donkey Kong. He then got his own game called Mario Bros and the rest is history.or mabey mario is a spinof of DK, wasnt the arcade game called donkey kong? not mario.
Yea the original arcade game was called Donkey Kong. Duck beat me to it.or mabey mario is a spinof of DK, wasnt the arcade game called donkey kong? not mario.
The first part of this I agree with pretty much.If I were in charge of ssb4 and could do whatever the hell I wanted with regard to make the game here is what I would do.
First of all, remove the abomination known as random tripping
Key points to consider, It has to stay noob friendly enough to encourage new gamers to buy this game and have fun playing it.
It must be complex enough to ensure longevity and competitiveness of the title so the people still play years from now.
Above all it must be fun to play.
I'd make it for the X-box or PS3, lets face it, the Wii is too wiik to handle SSB's full potential.
Last of all, I would actually monitor the game after it's release make a few patches the fix anything glaringly wrong that was not found during testing somehow, and maybe even release an Xpac after a couple years.
you my friend have said perfection.The first part of this I agree with pretty much.
The second part's ********. SSB4 would probably be released for the next console that Nintendo makes. I REALLY hope that Nintendo doesn't half-arse the graphics card / system / whatever just so their system's compact. Let's face it- Wii graphics blow. 8 years from now, think of how great graphics could potentially be on X box 720 or PS4 (or whatever). If Nintendo continues with its tradition of going half was with graphics, they better have some hella great gameplay to make up for it. Even with all the great games on Wii, something new (other than Brawl) needs to come out to keep me hooked, or I'm going back to my 64, when Nintendo ruled the graphics industry (amirite? I think they did).
QFEFLet's face it- Wii graphics blow. 8 years from now, think of how great graphics could potentially be on X box 720 or PS4 (or whatever). If Nintendo continues with its tradition of going half was with graphics, they better have some hella great gameplay to make up for it. Even with all the great games on Wii, something new (other than Brawl) needs to come out to keep me hooked, or I'm going back to my 64, when Nintendo ruled the graphics industry (amirite? I think they did).
Okay, so, the best graphics on Wii so far are probably Metroid Prime 3. Now, I have no idea what the best looking games on 360 and PS3 are, but I sure as hell know that COD4 has better graphics than MP3 on whichever system you look at (except DS). To try a better example, look at Guitar Hero 3. The PS3 and 360 graphics are great, then the Wii's are garbage. The Wii's are about the same as THE PS2's, possibly worse. I haven't really compared either. Point is, while I generally like the Wii more than the 360 and PS3 due to my love for Nintendo / other system's are too expensive for me, Microsoft and Sony have Nintendo when it comes to graphics.QFEF
...Half *** the graphics card? It's one thing to say wii graphics suck, but it's another to say they suck and then kid every living soul on the planet and say the playstation and x-box are doing better.
Brawl's graphics aren't bad, but imagine the resolution you could get in HD like with 360 or PS3? And don't be pessimistic, maybe Nintendo won't slack on the graphics. Maybe the reason Microsoft and Sony outrank Nintendo in graphics is because they aren't solely a gaming industry? The HD technology and internet technology may be more easily accessible to Microsoft and Sony because they dabble in these things elsewhere, while Nintendo doesn't?I think the graphics for Brawl as it is are fine. The best thing they can improve is the textures should be higher resolution in SSB4, but the polygon count is fine. I don't think SSB4 graphics can compare with next-gen consoles though.