And now for an intermission
Some of my "favorite"
:ouch: character suggestions for SSB4 from some of the people here:
Geno
The demand for this one-shot character is mindboggling. I understand that SMRPG was a great game, but people make it sound as if Geno carried that game. Its Geno...outside of SMRPG, what thehell else does he have under his belt? Rare, and I mean EXTREMELY rare & forgettable cameos in like...1, 2 games? Hell, Pit of Kid Icarus has had even more cameos if you're going to play THAT card, and Nintendo actallu owns THAT character! People are saying that the cast of SSB doesn't have to have "super elite characters as long as our favorites get in"...yeah...if that's true, I want Astro Boy in SSB4 because he's a favorite of mine. And my sister wants the cast of High School Musical in too. And Sora and Roxas...because everyone has their favorites they'd like to see in this game doesn't mean that character needs to be in.
Factor in that Nintendo doesn't fully (if at all) owns Geno, that if SquareEnix were to have a rep for SSB4, it would be a major Final Fantasy character (seriously, you think SE would opt to allow a random puppet in a popular crossover game before whoring Cloud or Squall?), and since everyone believes that Nintendo caters to the casual crowd, only the hardcore fans (and those who just can't let Geno go and get over it) would even know or care who he was, Geno is a 3rd party character that should be omitted.
Master Chief/Characters clearly owned by Nintendo's competitors
Why do people honestly think that Nintendo's business rivals would let Nintendo use their characters? Why do people honestly think Nintendo would WANT to help advertise their rivals mascots? Even more Nintendo would be PAYING Microsoft to feature Master Chief in atheir game, so it would be more a win-win for Microsoft.
I freakin' LOVE Ratchet & Clank, but that's Sony. Their owned by Sony, or specifically Insomniac Games, which is owned by Sony. So no, Master Chief, Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sack Boy, etc...character owned by Sony or Microsoft will never appear in n Nintendo game...nothing short of Nintendo buying out those IP would make that possible.
More than 1 new F-Zero character
This is more a pet peeve than an issue. Heck, at LEAST these guys are owned by Nintendo and are a part of a somewhat big franchise. I'm going to put my bias aside and say that if there were to be a new F-Zero character in SSB4, the total of newcomers should be 1. So in addition to CF, there would be 1 other F-Zero rep. As I've explained before, the F-Zero cast are far from interesting. Many of the characters would bring little to the table.
Krystal
Its not the notion of Krystal in SSB4 that gets me so much as the obnoxious fanbase that wantsher in; seriously, the Ridley fanbase wants Ridley in as much as you Krystal furries wnat Krystal, but they don't come off as people I want to strike with a metal pike. I had a very good debate with someone in one of the groups I'm a member of that made me realize something...and its rare that anyone can change my opinion as I was on the pro-Krystal bandwagon...StarFox is lucky to have the three reps its got. Seriously, StarFox hasn't been the franchise it once was; three reps are enough. Now, the idea of replacing one SF character for another is a different story altogether, but adding yet another one to the total of 3 we already have? It's StarFox, people. Not Zelda, not Pokémon.
The limitless inclusion of even more Sonic/Konami characters
Snake's inclusion opened a Pandora's Box of stupid. While I'm not against maybe one more playable Sonic/MGS rep, the idea of 5 Sonic characters and the like is just too much. The guest characters (key word being GUEST) are taking over and bringing their inbred hillbilly kinfolk with them! Its almost as if people would rather just turn the Smash series into a Sega/Konami crossover and call it a day. But let's consider that that won't be the case with 4. So with that in mind, shouldn't we try to think within a reasonable logic? Like, why am I seeing people suggest Shadow and Silver in SSB4 before f*ck*ng Tails or Sonic characters that actually matter?! Tails! A classic, important character from the best days of Sonic! Yet people want the gimmicky Shadow and Silver instead?! What the hell?! The Konami sugestions are no where near as stupid, its true, but people are saying things like "Simon Belmont and Sparkster for 4!"...Sigh...At least come out and say it: "Let's turn the Nintendo All-Stars Fighting game into a 5 Company Crossover"!
SmashBrosMike
This guy really rubs me the wrong way. I pray that he and Sakurai do not share the same brain wavelengths, else God spare us!
Waluigi
OK, bias here. I'm the biggest Waluigi hater there is, but I will admit, unlike the thought of Geno, Resident Evil's Leon Kennedy, or some other *ss-random character suggestion, Waluigi's inclusion wouldn't bestupid in retrospect, sadly. That's why this guy doesn't even rank too high on my list, as I just persoanally hate him. He's a gimmick of a gimmick, with the 1st gimmick being a well-used, fairly popular character that has been developed over the years very finely (Wario). Who gives a bloody v*g*n*l fart about Waluigi?! It wouldn't be the end of the world if he made it in, however. Maybe in the following years something can be done to make him seem more worthy of being a playable rep in a Smash game. Right now, all bias aside, there are better candidates.