Lord Viper
SS Rank
flyinfilipino... you forgot Star Fox Adventure. D:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think Jiggz should be a female PT's Pokémon.They need to bring everyone back! But of course, they are thinking of casual players only, the most popular characters. (To make money 0_o) Then again is jiggly really all that popular?
Oops. (well, Falco and Slippy were in their ships)flyinfilipino... you forgot Star Fox Adventure. D:
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb176/JLT4GOV/3860140e412cc94e20ee96888b033522.pngSuper Smash Sisters
No... just, no.Super Smash Bros Blues Clues
Epic win for Kumatora.http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb176/JLT4GOV/3860140e412cc94e20ee96888b033522.png
Just putting that out there. :D
That would also be considered copying "Mortal Kombat: Armageddon" to some people.I also liked the aforementioned Armageddon title, but it might be a bit too serious for Smash.
QFTI don't doubt the prospect of an SSB4, but I doubt Sakurai's position as director, or as a member of the team at all. You need some insight into the management of Nintendo and HAL to really understand the dynamics - how far honour or respect will get you when you do a stupid thing like leave the company. In essence, Sakurai's a free agent, who transpires to do sequels [a reason for his leaving] and outside assignments for Nintendo.
The good part of that is, Sakurai has indeed made a sequel for Smash Bros. whilst being a free agent. Over a period of several years, he [arguably] successfully coerced his team at HAL into making a viable sequel. What we do know about Nintendo - Miyamoto, at least - is that they have high-quality standards for supposed high-quality projects, thus why there hasn't been a stinker Super Mario or Legend of Zelda or Metroid game *touches wood*.
The bad part of that is, Nintendo doesn't have to re-hire him. If he makes a mistake somewhere down the line, or simply isn't free when Nintendo needs him, they could full well get another chump to sit in his chair. Sakurai's plan to make Brawl more newb-friendly kinda backfires in that respect, as any monkey with a computer can make Mario Party 10 if you give them a thousand years. Sakurai's direction isn't needed, nor is his advice, with a growing posse of younger developers coming through and Brawl being a massive undertaking by a group of developers.
Another issue is if Sakurai even wants to develop the next game. Brawl sold well and garnered a lot of praise. Despite all outside help, this was indeed Sakurai's baby and his reasons for leaving HAL were to escape the 'sequelisation' of the industry, but it is obvious that he simply could not live up to his credentials anymore. With that in respect, Brawl may be the point where Sakurai says, "my work is done, I've got nothing to prove anymore", which is fair enough. If he were to take this stance, I doubt Nintendo would wager too much on bringing him back, as as much as he would like to believe that Brawl was Kirby Wii, it really wasn't. There are far better directors out there.
Seriously, Sakurai needs to start making new games. Everything he does reeks of Kirby, if he's on the development side [he was a designer for Meteos]. If he wants to make Kirby games, he shouldn't have left HAL.
Very good points indeed. I too have also considered his directions in the future of Smash Bros. You made well debatable points in the issue that he is indeed a freelance worker, but he can easily be replaced by any other programmer who has just as good (or even better) ideas than Masahiro S.I don't doubt the prospect of an SSB4, but I doubt Sakurai's position as director, or as a member of the team at all. You need some insight into the management of Nintendo and HAL to really understand the dynamics - how far honour or respect will get you when you do a stupid thing like leave the company. In essence, Sakurai's a free agent, who transpires to do sequels [a reason for his leaving] and outside assignments for Nintendo.
The good part of that is, Sakurai has indeed made a sequel for Smash Bros. whilst being a free agent. Over a period of several years, he [arguably] successfully coerced his team at HAL into making a viable sequel. What we do know about Nintendo - Miyamoto, at least - is that they have high-quality standards for supposed high-quality projects, thus why there hasn't been a stinker Super Mario or Legend of Zelda or Metroid game *touches wood*.
The bad part of that is, Nintendo doesn't have to re-hire him. If he makes a mistake somewhere down the line, or simply isn't free when Nintendo needs him, they could full well get another chump to sit in his chair. Sakurai's plan to make Brawl more newb-friendly kinda backfires in that respect, as any monkey with a computer can make Mario Party 10 if you give them a thousand years. Sakurai's direction isn't needed, nor is his advice, with a growing posse of younger developers coming through and Brawl being a massive undertaking by a group of developers.
Another issue is if Sakurai even wants to develop the next game. Brawl sold well and garnered a lot of praise. Despite all outside help, this was indeed Sakurai's baby and his reasons for leaving HAL were to escape the 'sequelisation' of the industry, but it is obvious that he simply could not live up to his credentials anymore. With that in respect, Brawl may be the point where Sakurai says, "my work is done, I've got nothing to prove anymore", which is fair enough. If he were to take this stance, I doubt Nintendo would wager too much on bringing him back, as as much as he would like to believe that Brawl was Kirby Wii, it really wasn't. There are far better directors out there.
Seriously, Sakurai needs to start making new games. Everything he does reeks of Kirby, if he's on the development side [he was a designer for Meteos]. If he wants to make Kirby games, he shouldn't have left HAL.
I don't hold any hate towards Sakurai for prolonging Kirby aspects through his games, more that he lacks creativity and thus Kirby is all he has. Insofar that he buffed Kirby characters, I disagree, but he did comment at one point that Brawl was planned to be his last game in the series or that he simply didn't care anymore, so he would indeed focus more on his own characters than anyone else's. This would also extend to Solid Snake naturally, as he is friendly with Hideo Kojima, the creator of that character.If I had a quarter for every time someone hates on Sakurai for being biased toward the Kirby series in Smash... I would have no quarters, because I would promptly proceed to drive them through the heads of the offenders. And I believe that means a few of you would have quarters lodged deeply into your skulls.
That's all I wanted to say. Bottled that in for too long...
Everyone here knows Sakurai created Kirby. Everyone here knows Sakurai created Smash. What's the big deal?I don't hold any hate towards Sakurai for prolonging Kirby aspects through his games, more that he lacks creativity and thus Kirby is all he has. Insofar that he buffed Kirby characters, I disagree, but he did comment at one point that Brawl was planned to be his last game in the series or that he simply didn't care anymore, so he would indeed focus more on his own characters than anyone else's. This would also extend to Solid Snake naturally, as he is friendly with Hideo Kojima, the creator of that character.
It only proves further how blatant a flaw this is on Sakurai's part when every poster acknowledges it.
Precisely. There's no need for every single person to whine about bias. No matter who created Smash, there would be some bias, and I, personally, believe Sakurai did an excellent job at being fair to every series. If you don't, that's fine, but whining about any bias is getting really, really old.Everyone here knows Sakurai created Kirby. Everyone here knows Sakurai created Smash. What's the big deal?
I'm not exactly sure why people expected something else when the creator of Smash, who also happens to be the creator of Kirby, decided to make a side-scrolling adventure -_-;I'm guessing the reason some people kind of bashed the creater of Smash because of the SSE, it might be somthing else but that's my highest reason due to most reviewers not liking the SSE. -_-;
Wait, that's a great idea. Make the story mode for the next smash a third-person game!!! Something that would totally defeat the porpuse of a side-scrolling fighting game would be AWSOME!!!I'm not exactly sure why people expected something else when the creator of Smash, who also happens to be the creator of Kirby, decided to make a side-scrolling adventure -_-;
Yeah, but that's not the point I was trying to make.Wait, that's a great idea. Make the story mode for the next smash a third-person game!!! Something that would totally defeat the porpuse of a side-scrolling fighting game would be AWSOME!!!
Maximum SARCASM right there
In the least, there are no more Kirby characters to add. I wouldn't mind seeing the tree and eye, cloud, thingy in the next Smash game.On the point of Kirby bias, I don't really think it was what Kirby GOT that was unfair (other than Meta Knight's broken-ness). It was what other more popular series did NOT get. If Mario, Metroid, and DK (the three most underrepped series IMO in Brawl) had just one more character each, I doubt there would be nearly as many complaining people out there.
Although I believe that Sakurai should be monitored by creators of other series who could develop for SSB4, that way he won't try to pull out even more bias, cause it would be very difficult to convince him that SSB4 would not be the last Smash, and therefore make him want to work with his characters even more.
I agree with this statement. Not only should he be monitored, but they should have the final say in movesets, write the trophy descriptions, and give input of what characters they want in themselves. The biggest problem Smash has had is in its representation. Series like MOTHER, Metroid, and Donkey Kong are not being represented properly. There are inaccuracies in movesets and trophies. This is a Nintendo game. Aside from some possible localization errors (like Lyn being 15 in the English version as opposed to 18), there should be absolutely no errors in details like backstories.On the point of Kirby bias, I don't really think it was what Kirby GOT that was unfair (other than Meta Knight's broken-ness). It was what other more popular series did NOT get. If Mario, Metroid, and DK (the three most underrepped series IMO in Brawl) had just one more character each, I doubt there would be nearly as many complaining people out there.
Although I believe that Sakurai should be monitored by creators of other series who could develop for SSB4, that way he won't try to pull out even more bias, cause it would be very difficult to convince him that SSB4 would not be the last Smash, and therefore make him want to work with his characters even more.
You forget his animal friends and helpers, (Ricky and Knuckle Joe hello). ;DIn the least, there are no more Kirby characters to add.
Friggin F-Zero, mang! D:<Series like MOTHER, Metroid, and Donkey Kong are not being represented properly.
How could I forget this series?!Friggin F-Zero, mang! D:<
You're kidding, thankfully.You forget his animal friends and helpers, (Ricky and Knuckle Joe hello). ;D