john!
Smash Hero
NONE of this would even be here if not for Super Mario Brothers. Why is there no Super Mario Brothers category? Eh?!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This sounds like a reasonable compromise. I think most people in the 64 community would be happy to be given the chance for any more exposure, even if the videos are barred from the final product.I actually love 64. The reason for the lack of 64 inclusion is I wanted something we could show to editors, media, and corporate people to really show off our community. And the problem is the game graphically looks too dated (whereas Melee/Brawl look somewhat similar) to give the right impression.
And the same issue stands (albeit not graphics) for brawl+. To include it opens a whole can of worms dealing with some of the people id like to potentially show the video off to.
That said it would be really cool to see some 64/brawl+ videos. I planned on doing some other contest in the future and we could certainly include them then. Another option if you guys are interested would be to allow both games with the stipulation that the community could select your video as top 5 and you could win premium but for the reasons described above you would not be selected as the winner. Because there will only be 5 slots we would have to limit it to one 64, and one Brawl+ included video submission maximum in the top 5. But if you guys are still pumped to do a submission even with the cant win 1st place stipulation im all for it.
Notice that I said "I CAN SHOW OFF" not that I only will show off to. This contest is for everyone. Its for new players to see something cool and a great introduction to our community, vets to see some amazing stuff in action, its for talented video editors to see their work featured on our site, its for us to start to give back some of the money from premium to the community, and yes it is for me to show editors, media, and corporate people in hopes they will see how great our community is, how great smash can be competitively, all in hopes to get more exposure to our community.FINALLY,
Someone tells us the truth. The truth being that this contest is NOT for the community and NOT for new players. That clears every "graphics" issue right up.
Why couldn't you losers in the first four pages tell us this right off the bat? Now everyone's all pissy and mislead.
Of course, Smashboards, you better well ****ing host a smash64/Brawl+ combo video competition now, to make up for the blatant douchebaggery.
I'm glad it's all settled now though.
Lol, not bad, glad you noticed.so hows that sense of humor workin out for you, john9blue?
How the hell are more people gonna spend time in the 64 forums if they can't find it because it's under "Gaming", right next to pokemon and zelda?Some of the people that hear about the community that come over got their start in 64 and would still be thrilled to play the game. And guess what community, what forums they will spend most of their time in. Yep the 64.
Simple answer? It's no longer played competitively on any meaningful scale. Why try to promote the community around an (essentially) dead game?
Also, since feeding the trolls is funny, any idiot can combo during hitstun, it's harder when you actually have to read and bait your opponent in to mistakes to continue your combo.
I lol'd at what this thread has turned into.
And about SSB64.
Seriously, every match is a combo video. What's the point of a SSB64 combo video?
so... reading those posts... what are we supposed to think? Before you posted, that's the reasons we got for why 64 was not in. Pretty valid reason for us to get mad.if you can host a smash 64 tourney and have more then 10 serious entrants in a populated area, it's not dead, alright?
it'd be like if nobody hosted brawl tournaments anymore but people said it was still alive because of wifi. lol.
Does this not prove our point? Is the 64 forums that hard to find that someone must use 'Ctrl+f' to find it?^ Make it sound like it's rocket science dude. Ctrl+f works well too
How the hell are more people gonna spend time in the 64 forums if they can't find it because it's under "Gaming", right next to pokemon and zelda?
^ Make it sound like it's rocket science dude. Ctrl+f works well too
Does this not prove our point? Is the 64 forums that hard to find that someone must use 'Ctrl+f' to find it?
... seriously, does this not prove our point? People are saying we are fine stuck under gaming and that we should complain. How well would melee do if the melee section was at the very bottom of the index, under EVERYTHING? Would it still be as good as it is now?It's how it goes man.
Way to miss the point altogether. Please stop posting in this topic, you are wasting the server's bandwidth.If there were to be a SSB4, each game would move down a notch in the forums. Brawl would be where Melee is now and so on. But that's saying the said SSB4 would be as good and popular as its predecessors.
What does that have to do with anything?If there were to be a SSB4, each game would move down a notch in the forums. Brawl would be where Melee is now and so on. But that's saying the said SSB4 would be as good and popular as its predecessors.
Nope, just need to put it after melee, its okIf there were to be a SSB4, each game would move down a notch in the forums. Brawl would be where Melee is now and so on. But that's saying the said SSB4 would be as good and popular as its predecessors.
You're telling him he is wasting bandwidth when you are arguing about the location of the SSB64 board in a Melee/Brawl combo video competition announcement, in which the higher ups have already explained their reasoning concerning SSB64?Way to miss the point altogether. Please stop posting in this topic, you are wasting the server's bandwidth.
I actually love 64. The reason for the lack of 64 inclusion is I wanted something we could show to editors, media, and corporate people to really show off our community. And the problem is the game graphically looks too dated (whereas Melee/Brawl look somewhat similar) to give the right impression.
And the same issue stands (albeit not graphics) for brawl+. To include it opens a whole can of worms dealing with some of the people id like to potentially show the video off to.
That said it would be really cool to see some 64/brawl+ videos. I planned on doing some other contest in the future and we could certainly include them then. Another option if you guys are interested would be to allow both games with the stipulation that the community could select your video as top 5 and you could win premium but for the reasons described above you would not be selected as the winner. Because there will only be 5 slots we would have to limit it to one 64, and one Brawl+ included video submission maximum in the top 5. But if you guys are still pumped to do a submission even with the cant win 1st place stipulation im all for it.
Obvious troll is obviousjust keep it at brawl...smash64=just naw..
brawl is a better game, thats what matters
yupAs far as Brawl+ goes, I will try to have an answer by Wednesday. I wouldn't rule it out quite yet.
Cool dood!I RAGE ALL DAY
Would you give your word?That said it would be really cool to see some 64/brawl+ videos. I planned on doing some other contest in the future and we could certainly include them then. Another option if you guys are interested would be to allow both games with the stipulation that the community could select your video as top 5 and you could win premium but for the reasons described above you would not be selected as the winner. Because there will only be 5 slots we would have to limit it to one 64, and one Brawl+ included video submission maximum in the top 5. But if you guys are still pumped to do a submission even with the cant win 1st place stipulation im all for it.