ChivalRuse
Smash Hero
Just so you know, Chudat beat Eggm last time they met in tournament.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=273518
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=273518
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That's true, but I would say that it's a lot easier for fox to hit a shine than for the IC's to get a grab. Fox has a lot of options that he can do against IC's and he can pressure them very easily while IC's really rely on grabs in the matchup.White_Mike, shine is good in that MU, but the ICs can get around almost any technique including shine spam, aerial spam, smash spam, whatever. If a shine hits, thats good news for fox, but I could as easily say "all the ICs have to do is grab it *****"
It is hard for both of them to get their best moves in whenever they are each defending against it.
You can't pull up one specific set and use that as proof for a character beating another character, especially when player skill is involved.lol wat.
if matches don't prove anything what does? XD Back to super theory bros?
If Fox beat ICs, bad, why are there so many instances of good ICs doing well against good Foxes? This isn't just citing single matches; Chu did consistently well against the best Fox players in the world, and other good IC players are usually evenish against the good Fox players in their region.Chu in his prime went around even with PC in sets and beat KDJ most of the time. More recently I think he's even in sets with jman and has lost to a few other foxes, but he's not really in his prime anymore. I think Fly sometimes beating Lucky (to be honest I don't really know their record) and Wobbles usually beating Forward are just more examples of Fox not ****** ICs when the players are at the same skill level.
Well that was a while ago and a lot of IC's old tricks don't work as well now.If Fox beat ICs, bad, why are there so many instances of good ICs doing well against good Foxes? This isn't just citing single matches; Chu did consistently well against the best Fox players in the world, and other good IC players are usually evenish against the good Fox players in their region.
Wait what?It's because of the shine you say right? once nana is gone it really doesn't work as well and popo and still grab **** him, still edge gaurd him, and if anything popo is now faster but weaker without nana.I just think fox beats IC's, bad.
>.>;
I said he changed your quote.No my post reads SMYM11, I didn't change his quote at all.
You're being stupid and believing exactly what he wants you to believe. And I'm not mad about any of this, I just find it a bit annoying.
ummm carefully reread that till you fully understand what you posted. fox can pressure everyone with that and the ice climbers aren't like fighting the the other chain throwers when an ice climber grabs you they make less mistakes because most ice climbers train a lot on their chain throws dair d-throw is habit and I rarly chain throw we don't mess up as much as other people chain throw wise. we are like puff on the ground your grabs are her rests with just as many if not more set-ups but harder to punish a missed grab than a missed rest.Well without shine, fox can still easily pressure them with nair and up throw up air works pretty **** well on Ice Climbers.
A lot of characters can grab **** and edgeguard fox, doesn't mean they're going to beat him.
old tricks..people still fall for simple icy stuff and they are one of the few characters that has evolved..just because people got i bit more technical with fox doesnt make this match up bad for icys ..people in as a whole are not good vs icys but i think icys are still being figured out at the same time and have alot of room to grow.Well that was a while ago and a lot of IC's old tricks don't work as well now.
Plus Fox has evolved so much since then while Ice Climbers haven't changed one bit.
From what I've seen, IC's usually lose to Fox players but I don't really follow IC players and their performances.
I'm just thinking about what I've seen and the two characters.
I read that as **** and it made me LOL irl.i think vs shiek..i use to think they had a n advantage vs her then her tilts starting getting annoying and if she spaces really good she can win.
Well you're m2k lol.i know these were just friendlies, but ive 3 stocked chu with my sheik in my melee prime twice before (out of like 3-4 total games) by mostly just spacing forward airs and doing stuff like needle -> fair from platforms
pushes them too far back to do anything really. And Nana is too easy to 0-death
You really shouldn't be letting Sheik tilt you below 60%. CC them and run up grab her while she's still in the tilt animation.i think vs shiek..i use to think they had a n advantage vs her then her tilts starting getting annoying and if she spaces really good she can win.
peach is the best at getting rid of nana i think..some of those shine stuff shouldnt work if u pay attention to your nana,but maybe thats me..peach can do like one dsmash to dash attack by the ledge and nana diesI was actually kidding when I said because you're m2k lol.
I think that the IC's both have to be present to really **** fox and he is the best at getting rid of Nana soooo.
roy and link are trashHow is Ganon higher than Roy or Link? And how is Fox barely higher than Marth?
Fox > castHow is Ganon higher than Roy or Link? And how is Fox barely higher than Marth?
Well I'm not playing a character for him being popular [I mean I am not the whole community but I'm sure there are SOME People who play characters for a reason other than popularity, sadly most do tho :[ ]. I play him because he is my favorite... I am seriously trying to become good with him. Its tough...it just seems to me that the community has along way to go to make a final tier list..the meta game didnt change that much for every character. and i think alot of characters still have alot of potential but these days people just want to play the ones who are popular
The Samus player was playing correctly, cheap = good. Learn that.I've been playing Marth for a while and kept getting ***** by Samus, until I went over to Sheik a bit. Found that the only way I could possibly beat this guy was just beating the hell outa him, making it impossible for him to ever get distance. Problem was that I couldn't ever make him come over to me with Marth, but with Sheik I was able to needle him and make him want to get closer. At the same time it was the only char i really found fast enough and with enough paste to get on with those tacts. Also, I knew I was better at him in all ways concerning wavedashing and shffling in close combat. What he did was simply trading %, and when I had enough % to get flying away he just hit me and then kept sending missiles etc. until I died.
Anyone had the same experience? And if so, do you know any other specific way to overcome this kind of ****ty way of playing? Cause at a point it really felt hopeless. He just continued with this freaking cheap tacts.
You're from long island?How is Ganon higher than Roy or Link? And how is Fox barely higher than Marth?
Chu is a better example than Wobbles or Fly. He made better use of their entire moveset and his movement was much better than either of them. Wobbles makes really good reads and capitalizes on grabs really well, Fly does the same but with a more defensive playstyle. Being able to capitalize on grabs is really objective though, and when Chu wobbled I would say he was the closest to IC's metagame that we have seen.Chu is NOT the IC metagame. He is really good, but so behind on the new very powerful techniques in the IC metagame.
Not even close.
Fly and Wobbles are close to what the IC metagame could be. Wobbles has insane techskill, grabs and movement. Fly has great patience, ability to get grabs, and reading ability. Unfortunately, they each lack what the other has and no "ultimate player" exists.
Ive just had enough of people using Chu as the IC metagame. I would say Fly is the best example, and Wobbles second, but no true embodiment of the metagame exists for the ICs.
Using Chu to represent the ICs is like using Isai to represent Falcon.
Armada = PeachI think the meta game is a combination of Chu Wobbles and Fly.
It doesnt have to rely on one person, and it really shouldnt.
Ultima falco is a combo of shiz mango zhu SW chops Pee Pee, You can give and take from all of them. I would rather have more players to pull from instead of looking for the m2k=marth. Then when he loses to a puff, the matchup becomes Puff>marth(not making a judgement)