The Star King
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 9,681
I didn't even notice that. You ruined everything D:It was good until "COUTERS."
And Sveet you're the last person who can criticize grammar. Use apostrophes n****
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I didn't even notice that. You ruined everything D:It was good until "COUTERS."
Someone screenshot this ****.Shoutouts to Bones for breaking the status quo and getting people to seriously reconsider the tierlist. The downfall of fox has begun, the peach uprising is inevitable.
The revolution will not be televised.
no no. From above.Are you talking about from bellow the ledge?
I agree that sweet spotting from above would probably work great, I mean the worst that could happen is a trade and most likely if they trade, the Fox can just illusion back to the stage.
That is until the Peach uses Toad against the Firefox...how would that work anyways? :S
this is why i dont post in melee discussion anymore.past few pages are the reason I don't post in Melee Discussion basically anymore
That makes no sense.Lists that dont take results into account r also pretty silly, i mean if we r not taking results into consideration at that point we might as well make the tier list based on ar so bowser for 3rd.
So then u do think bowser is the 3rd best? B/c once u take out the human from the equation that is what u get. Ideally we would be able to come up with some formula to combine human ability/ and or results and character strengths/ and or potential. But since we cant do that atm we cant ignore results or else bowser is the 3rd best and yoshi is 4thThat makes no sense.
Tier lists is (should be) about character strengths, not player representation.
I think it's both, really. On the one hand, there aren't that many things he does which would surprise most people who have even a moderate understanding of Peach. At the same time, he's kind of shown why she can compete (insert different Peach related things here).Like I said before, we shouldn't care about results, but rather the gameplay. The fact that Armada gets 1st is irrelevant. What is relevant is how he does it. If he's just outplaying everyone with a bad character, the bearing his gameplay should have on the tier list is pretty low. Anyone who thinks he hasn't shown how Peach, as a character, can be abused is just ignorant.
idk 2 years sounds appropriate.Lovage thats something Kage mentioned to me too. Perhaps it is too early for another tier list...
I agree with this too. Yoshi is so much better than people give him credit for. Unlike someone like Ness or Pichu, Yoshi has a lot going for him. I bet he was put all the way down there just because he has no third jump and can't jump out of shield, but those weaknesses actually give him unique strengths.i think that mainly yoshi, roy, and ylink need some restructuring, these things have been generally agreed upon by many people
results give a good sense of the game but you gotta treat outliers for what they are lol, peach isn't #1 just because armada is
BTW overall i don't think the tier list has honestly changed that drastically since 2010. sveet was asking the MBR for their personal tier lists and mine came out pretty similar to this (puff slightly lower, some low tier changes)
we definitely need heros to show us how good some characters actually are though
if armada was a marth main the tier list would probably be way different
crap. So I wrote all that for nothing?Lovage thats something Kage mentioned to me too. Perhaps it is too early for another tier list...
well Sveet is right about something its WAY too early for another tier list, I have no idea of the timetable of the tier list but it atleast should be atleast every 6 months in my opinion idk if any agrees or disagrees.crap. So I wrote all that for nothing?
yeah, it's definitely way different now.well Sveet is right about something its WAY too early for another tier list, I have no idea of the timetable of the tier list but it atleast should be atleast every 6 months in my opinion idk if any agrees or disagrees.
No. We will finish the project.crap. So I wrote all that for nothing?
Nope .i hope you guys have been taking my arguments about marth and fox into serious consideration.
okay we got it.i hope you guys have been taking my arguments about marth and fox into serious consideration.
Not sure if you meant that as "no, they havent, but they should" or "no they havent, because you're wrong", but either way, your tierlist is very similar to mineNope .
lolI lost vs Unknown's YL with my Link, he isn't bad YL.
okNo. We will finish the project.
never!i hope you guys have been taking my arguments about marth and fox into serious consideration.
typical him.Not sure if you meant that as "no, they havent, but they should" or "no they havent, because you're wrong", but either way, your tierlist is very similar to mine
no yours is similar to hisNot sure if you meant that as "no, they havent, but they should" or "no they havent, because you're wrong", but either way, your tierlist is very similar to mine