• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official MBR 2010 NTSC Tier List

Mew2King

King of the Mews
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
11,263
Location
Cinnaminson (southwest NJ 5 min drive from Philly)
omfg i never thought id see this!
a falco main who doesnt think he loses to everyone
kudos to you
^ This so hard (Zhu thinks falco is the best too though)

I actually think Fox is the 3rd best character (I realize there is nobody in the world that agrees with me though). I think falco and puff are better in singles. Falco's Dair, better range, guaranteed combos (not crouch-cancellable and DIable ones like fox has) and lasers make him better than fox in singles by far. Fox is clearly better in teams. I think Fox's lack of range makes him worse than falco in most MUs, except Peach (mainly peach) and Jiggs (slightly). I realize a theoretical perfect fox is different, but I don't ever see that, when I do I might change my mind. This isn't based on potential, it's based on my experience playing the game since 2005 of where I see Fox as a tourney threat both to me and for getting 1st at a major compared to those 2 characters. I wouldn't base this judgment off of only one player though (I mess around with falco and puff a lot in friendlies and I do really well; I honestly think they are the best 2 characters for winning a big tournament). I've always thought Falco was the best (or 2nd) since about 2005 though, when I could beat everybody but I would always lose to PC chris. Unlike Fox, Falco's tools for combos are much easier to do consistently (this is very important) but also more guaranteed and longer, especially when you can chase people with lasers and control the match and manipulate habits much easier. With Fox it's much trickier. For example if you're a frame off in your drill shine, you will get shield grabbed.

As far as puff, it's mostly based on 2 things besides tourney results
1) easy to do consistently
2) planking gives a big advantage vs. the 3 fast-fallers. Example, you are at 4 stock high % and they are at 3 stock. There is no reason to not plank if you really want to win. It gives you a big advantage in terms of risk/reward ratio, and many characters can't easily kill you from there, but if they don't approach you can time them out. This has not happened by a good player in a high level match, but I definitely think it is a factor in how good she can be.

I think marth is a bit overrated, for the SOLE reason of how badly he gets ***** (at TOP level play, which is all that matters) once he gets hit. He's at the perfect get-zero-to-deathed-by-many-characters weight and falling speed. His offense and combo game is crazy good, but his defensive game + recovery are really bad at top level play. Sheik has the same problem but her recovery and weight are slightly better for this than marth's is, and her OOS options are better too. Take peach for example and compare them. I still think marth and sheik are slightly better than peach (but I could be wrong but I still think they are better), but the main difference is that Peach doesn't get 0-deathed like marth/sheik do overall. She has a big weakness though, and that is her lack of range. Her defense otherwise is far better since her recovery is not nearly as exploitable. C.falcon i think is slightly overrated honestly. Ice climbers are without a doubt better than captain falcon. If you are playing good against a captain falcon, you can 0-death him... with a LOT of characters. Doc would be right after these characters for sure (SIGNIFICANTLY better character than Mario imo), followed by pikachu (I am basing this solely off of what I have seen Axe do, but from my knowledge of melee over 10 years and the things I have done, experienced, or seen, I cannot imagine another character deserving to be above pikachu, even though I think what Axe does is really hard to do). Doc might deserve to be above captain falcon... not sure. Think about it.. he can down throw chain grab and up throw chain grab so many characters, and he has several strong finishing moves, and really good camping, and good edge guarding. His only weakness (and it is a big one vs Sheik/Falco at least) is his bad recovery.
 

Levingy

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
78
I think Fox's lack of range makes him worse than falco in most MUs, except Peach (mainly peach) and Jiggs (slightly).
What do you mean by lack of range compared to falco? What moves exactly and how much worse the range is?
 

Blistering Speed

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
2,709
Location
Dot Dot Dash Dot
Well Fox hasn't had a surge in his metagame forever now. For as long as I can remember(2008 or so) Falcos have always been doing better than Fox's. It just seems silly that Fox is still #1 on the tier list.
Surge in metagame=/=surge in tournament success. Correlation does not equal causation.

Tournament results suck ****, I've said this for years. Way, way too many mitigating, confounding factors in a game like Melee. People just latch on to them because they (understandably) like a tangible basis for their arguments.

inb4****storm
 

Merkuri

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
1,860
Surge in metagame=/=surge in tournament success. Correlation does not equal causation.

Tournament results suck ****, I've said this for years. Way, way too many mitigating, confounding factors in a game like Melee. People just latch on to them because they (understandably) like a tangible basis for their arguments.

inb4****storm
I'm not sure what you're getting at. If Fox is the best character in the game then why has he never been dominant? All the other top tiers have. Fox is the odd one out.
 

Geenareeno

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
1,102
Location
Saskatoon, SK
Melee Discussion, where an appreciation of context/rational thought is always outweighed by pretending to establish a new point of argument.
I kinda feel you. It seems like literally more than half the time when someone is making an argument the other person says something more or less irrelevant.
 

john!

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
8,063
Location
The Garden of Earthly Delights
Reminder : What a Tier List is

This new tier list was created according to this definition :

A tier list is a list of characters ranked best to worst in their likelihood to perform well in a tournament setting in the near future based on recent, relevant tournament results. We then separate characters at statistically significant gaps to be grouped with their relative equals, and those groupings are called "tiers". A tier list is, in essence, a "prediction" list as to how any given character will fare in a competitive setting. We naturally assume top level of play.
the tier list is based directly on tournament results, not theorycrafting by random players.
 

Crooked Crow

drank from lakes of sorrow
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
2,247
I'm pretty sure the tier list is ordered based on how well the characters should do in tournament though...
A tier list is simply analyzing character potential in a controlled setting. Human players lacking the technical consistency required to use Fox at top levels of play, doesn't necessarily detract from the potential Fox initially possesses.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
If we were basing the tier list off of potential, then we would put those 3 apparently perfect characters (Fox, Falco, Bowser) in top tier and everyone else would be garbage tier.

It should be pretty obvious why that isn't the case.
 

Crooked Crow

drank from lakes of sorrow
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
2,247
If we were basing the tier list off of potential, then we would put those 3 apparently perfect characters (Fox, Falco, Bowser) in top tier and everyone else would be garbage tier.

It should be pretty obvious why that isn't the case.
Bowser is bottom tier because humans don't have frame perfect gameplay.

*Edit*

By the way, my previous post wasn't targeted at you in particular- but a lot of differentiating factors come into place in order for a tier list to be fully developed on an accurate scale.

Fox, unlike Bowser, doesn't need frame perfect reaction, as the metagame has clearly stated. However, I'm not claiming Fox is the best in the game, but we can't automatically disregard his ability to perform due to a lack of tournament results. What about matchups, or studying the actual character itself?

I knew you'd see a contradiction, so I felt as if I had to clarify. For now, arguing on the internet is a waste of time, and I'm not entirely sure whether you're actually seeing the main point I'm trying to make here.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
A tier list is simply analyzing character potential in a controlled setting. Human players lacking the technical consistency required to play Fox at top levels of play, doesn't necessarily detract from the potential Fox initially possesses.
So let me get this straight...

Fox is too hard to play at top level = He is still top of the tier list due to potential
Bowser is too hard to play at top level = He is bottom tier despite potential

Niiice...
 

Strong Badam

Super Elite
Administrator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
26,564
So let me get this straight...

Fox is too hard to play at top level = He is still top of the tier list due to potential
Bowser is too hard to play at top level = He is bottom tier despite potential

Niiice...
this is a horrendous strawman and you know it Grim XD
imperfect Fox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imperfect Bowser
 
Top Bottom