Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
aside from M2k and PC i've yet to hear people placing well with marth. Also in this game marth runs into alot more hard match-ups. im only assuming now that its a little harder to use marth and he has no more dominant specific skill that he would be mid or low tier.Except that...Snake owns more characters harder then MK.
Also, Benjamin Linus...Marth in low mid tier?
Yeah, I think I'm done with this thread for a bit.
agreed on Marth,DDD, and ZeldaThe mid tier. Olimar needs to go down. Marth, Dedede, and Zelda specifically should be higher.
I'll go in depth for my reasons on request I guess. <<
I changed some stuff. look better?Lowest tier needs a lot of work.
I wasn't aware. thanks.Personally, I believe Zamus should be higher than that. She's quick and has been doing pretty well in tourneys.
corrected.I would make God tier "Top Tier", rename low "Below Average", And then split the lowest tier at Peach, so the Bottom tier is Peach, Yoshi, Jiggly, Ganon, and CF.
Marth has two wins so far, and **** loads of Top 4 and Top 8 placings so far, probably more so than anyone else. Check Ankoku Character thread for proofaside from M2k and PC i've yet to hear people placing well with marth. Also in this game marth runs into alot more hard match-ups. im only assuming now that its a little harder to use marth and he has no more dominant specific skill that he would be mid or low tier.
unless you have information regarding marth players tourney placings that i havent seen then i dont think im incorrect. also M2K mainly uses De3 in tourney.
I think the problem here, is that, you weight way too much on tourney results and not enough on Matchups which in turn AFFECT AND REFLECT those tourney results, and creditied Pro opinion, which we either get from experianced players or the sticky in the Tactical disscussion thread.EL believe me, im am not saying marth is a bad character, i know hes good but i guess i was misinformed about his tourney placings. also in a debate a long time ago on what the tier lists are based on, im pretty sure it ended in the answer being tourney placings. match-ups may play a role but i think its mainly about how well the character does in tourney or how much he is used in tourney.
i could have been a little biased because in my area marth is rarely seen. i have also mainly seen only De3's and snakes winning in my areas tourneys. with what i have seen now i would say marth should be middle of high tier or maybe 2nd to last.
As for all the people putting De3 in mid-tier, i dont understand how you can do that when in 5 or so different states the best player mains De3.
I get my character info mostly from personal experience, taking into account mostly the best use of each character that I've seen. This is why most of my experience is with MK, DK, Bowser, Luigi, etc. and not so much with Wolf, TL, etc. Although recently I've seen some of the tourney-popular characters in action, so I have a pretty good idea of things.I understand what you are saying. But since no smash back roomers or major players post in this thread, you pretty much in the upper echelon as far as posters in this thread are concerned (unless you only factor the frequent intelligent posters on here. I am inclined to agree with you then). Unfortunately, NSS has you beat as far as tier quality is concerned imo (and I had to say that with a grain of salt considering I beleive Kirby players will rule smash one day)
Also, do you get your character info from personal exp., the tactical discussion, this thread or each of the character forums? I also ask this to NSS, BDawg, and Hedgehawg.
Too true XDIt appears the Smash Front room has accomplished one thing, reducing the amount of nub Tier lists. Great job guys, and it's only our first day >_>
I don't need to. I simply have more experience than you, so I can throw that around and it makes me rightI sure have played with good people.
Guess what?
There are ALOT more good MK's compared to good Marth's. MK is a much more popular character so this is to be expected.
You ****** your buddies Marth with MK means jack ****.
Whenever I read your post about Marth you say dumb ****. Things like Marth can't pressure and other such nonsense.
Stop it.
Tehboh: What? Dude...I'm the only one in this thread and the Brawl match-up thread posting that really KNOWS Marth.
I'm not a Marth fanatic. I have done soooooooooo much work in the Marth forums, and I know my ****. Marth's match-ups can have him as no less then high tier.
If you think you know your **** BDawg then debate me.
I'll move yoshi up... but I still think Link's better.@ Hedgedawg: Switch Luigi with Lucas & Pikachu with Olimar. Move Yoshi to at least the top of bottom.
Everything. This topic, Ankoku Character disscusion thread, the Matchup chart thread, Character threads, rarely do I use my very own opinion to factor things, only maybe as a last resort tiebreaker.My very own Tier list topic that originated from Gamefaqs, and so much more.I understand what you are saying. But since no smash back roomers or major players post in this thread, you pretty much in the upper echelon as far as posters in this thread are concerned (unless you only factor the frequent intelligent posters on here. I am inclined to agree with you then). Unfortunately, NSS has you beat as far as tier quality is concerned imo (and I had to say that with a grain of salt considering I beleive Kirby players will rule smash one day)
Also, do you get your character info from personal exp., the tactical discussion, this thread or each of the character forums? I also ask this to NSS, BDawg, and Hedgehawg.
lol, how many of you actually go to/do well in tournaments?