Supermodel From Paris
Smash Hero
Then there's good news! Your intuition isn't what we base a tier list on.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Still haven't figured it out myself.Could somebody explain how Ness is better than Lucas exactly?
You're just asking me to bug you about Lucas being worse than Ness again, aren't you?Still haven't figured it out myself.
Your typical argument doesn't cut it anymore ma boy.You're just asking me to bug you about Lucas being worse than Ness again, aren't you?
*insert my typical Ness's air game being better than Lucas's ground game and more important results argument here*
One is greater than zero.Ness showed up at one MLG.
Oh noes.
Lets not forget about how the best Lucas outplaced the best Ike and the best Ness at MLG DC (May have placed the same as San idk)One is greater than zero.
Pretty sure he did.There is a difference between "outplaced" and "the same". Let's see that results page. Did he go solo Lucas?
Pink Fresh is the best Lucas.And who is the best Lucas? I've heard a number of different names, so I don't think there is a set "Best Lucas" as far as I know. Unless that changed since the last Lucas discussion in here.
MLG DC results....
33: san37111 (EC) - Ike
33: PinkFreshhh - ?
...
49: Shaky3
This describes Lucas in general.theres also that florida dude galeon. he shows up to a tourney once every like 3 months. ***** a bunch of peoples and than fades back into obscurity
Then lets see themThere is a Ganon main in AN with better results than the best Lucas
![]()
My opinion of the list. Tear it appart guys:
<-- GOD TIER
![]()
![]()
<-- TOP TIER
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
<-- HIGH TIER
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
<-- HIGH MID TIER
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
<-- MID TIER
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
<-- LOW MID TIER
![]()
![]()
![]()
<-- LOW TIER
![]()
![]()
![]()
<-- BOTTOM TIER
<-- SATAN TIER
**** you.- G&W is too high....He belongs between fox and DK imo
- Pit and Peach belong between DK and ROB or around there
People should play Pit more. If you barely play him, it is easy to write him off as a lackluster character with little beneath the surface. Contrary to popular belief he isn't a bad character at all; he just requires work.
Well, first off, that is a statement based on a "metagame" tierlist."A tier list is a list of characters ranked best to worst in their likelihood to perform well in a tournament setting in the near future based on recent, relevant tournament results. We then separate characters at statistically significant gaps to be grouped with their relative equals, and those groupings are called "tiers". A tier list is, in essence, a "prediction" list as to how any given character will fare in a competitive setting. We naturally assume top level of play." -MBR Tier List Thread
Does the BBR follow this too?
That is not "popular belief" at all. I've rarely heard anyone call Pit a "bad character". He's just the epitome of mediocrity. He belongs practically in the very middle of the tier list.People should play Pit more. If you barely play him, it is easy to write him off as a lackluster character with little beneath the surface. Contrary to popular belief he isn't a bad character at all; he just requires work.
This is very true, honestly. Ness has done nothing noteworthy in quite a long time.tarextherex said:The Ness tourney result hype seems to be gone anyway
No.But as far as match-ups go, Ness wins. He honestly just has better tools than Lucas when it comes to dealing with top-level opponents. The ONLY advantage Lucas has on Ness is his more reliable recovery.
:green:
They really shouldn't, but that's the way it works.Yaaay said:Tier lists should not be based on hype @_@
Hardly relevant. Both get gayed anyway.Chuee said:You probably don't even know that Lucas breaks out from GRs farther than Ness.
A better keep-away game and more than one reliable kill move.Auspher said:What tools does Ness have that makes him better suited for top-level opponents compared to Lucas?
Lucas loses to MK, Snake, and Marth. And those are only his large disadvantages. His small disadvantages are even greater in quantity.tarextherex said:And Nestec, sorry about bringing this back, it's just that I wanted to mention that Ness wasn't really that good, and Lucas might be one of the low tiers characters that could surpass Ness. About MUs though, aren't Lucas's better? I'm pretty sure that Lucas's mains even worked around some of their **** MUs, so I think Lucas's MUs are better now. His less linear game seems to be more adaptive to higher level play than Ness's.
Correction in bold.Ripple said:lucas has a MUCH better mix up/cross up game on the ground than ness does.
Lucas does not have a "great" offense game. Explain to me why you think he does.what can ness do? wall? does he have a great offense game? no. lucas has a great offense game but a lack luster defense.
...which is true in just about every case for every character.Chuee said:It's just that if you read them Ness gets hit.
retreating dair as opposed to retreating fair is hardly a mix up. it has the same purpose.Ness actually does have really good aerial mix ups.
It's just that if you read them Ness gets hit.
wow, seriously?Lucas does not have a "great" offense game. Explain to me why you think he does.
they aren't clones. just because ness has a better spacing tool does not mean he is the better characterNess is better.
Only because his spacing tool is better.