DAlegendarysamus
Smash Lord
http://smashguardians.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=222&Itemid=1
FOR ALL YOU OBAMA FANS
FOR ALL YOU OBAMA FANS
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
dk vs. ddd is such an unfair matchupResults:
1st Obama (Donkey Kong)
2nd McCain (King DDD)
diddy = democratic donkeys
king ddd = closest thing to an elephant in brawl
actually Obama went game&watch..Results:
1st Obama (Donkey Kong)
2nd McCain (King DDD)
diddy = democratic donkeys
king ddd = closest thing to an elephant in brawl
Lollercopters.What unfortunate results. Never before has a more deserving, experienced, and genuine man been denied the presidency.
Pfft, Obama just got lucky. If that economic crisis hadn't spawned next to McCain in the second match he would've won.
lol, thats a good beat. It reminds me of the song from Silent Spectre's combo video. LOL.
Maybe McCain from the year 2000. This McCain was a completely erratic shell of his former self.What unfortunate results. Never before has a more deserving, experienced, and genuine man been denied the presidency.
omg I'm not alone on here!EDIT - As a libertarian, this is the saddest picture I'll see all day =(
![]()
you made me spew milk out my nosePfft, Obama just got lucky. If that economic crisis hadn't spawned next to McCain in the second match he would've won.
And this takes the cake.John McCain camped alot in this tourney, but Obama had better mindgames.
Anyone know who won teams? I heard Palin suicided 3 times.
Ron Paul for president! Much better choice than either of the two main candidates. Maybe next time.Hopefully the man he used to be returns, because I would've proudly voted for that guy.
EDIT - As a libertarian, this is the saddest picture I'll see all day =(
![]()
Sounds cliche but the constitution isn't a suicide pact. And I'm not talking about limiting freedom of speech/religion/privacy. I don't think making it legal for gay couples to marry limits any else's freedom, yet Paul believes they should not receive this right unless a state decides they should. If there is something in the constitution that would make you believe that this law shouldn't be allowed, it doesn't tell you something is wrong with the law, it tells you something is wrong with the constitution.Are we really having this debate here?
According to the Constitution (remember that thing?), the federal government doesn't have the right to legislate on civil rights anyway. Anything that's in the Bill of Rights, freedom of speech, religion, right to privacy, etc., the government can't constitutionally make laws about. The two major parties don't give a **** though.
If you think about it, slavery was unconstitutional from the get-go. They are people and they have all the same rights as everyone else. It's a shame it took a constitutional amendment to end slavery when the Constitution should have done that in itself.