Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I like this, and feel it should be used for hammering in the future.@Xonar
You have until Monday to change my mind, and if you can't do so, I'm going to hammer.
Does anyone else see this as...buddying of some sort? I mean, why would you specifically advise him to address points? Why are you trying to coach him, and if you aren't, why are you only specifying posts after #108?I had no idea you had a job!
However, I suggest doing an full re-read from #108.
With that said, see you and everyone else after school.
Right now, I'm waiting to see if Xonar will improve (Doubt it, as I am convinced he is scum for now). I'm actually surprised he didn't make another rebuttal to my comment because I want to see his thoughts on my comment (Abide logically).Meta-Kirby said:I mean, why would you specifically advise him to address points?
I am not coaching Xonar under any cirumstances. The reason why I'm only specifying posts after #108 is because that's when the game started. It would be useless to read the posts before the beginning of the game, unless it was to re-read the rules or stuff by Ronike/Tom/Xiivi, the mods/co-mods of the game.Meta-Kirby said:Why are you trying to coach him, and if you aren't, why are you only specifying posts after #108?
Unless you have limited Internet connection, I don't see how that's a excuse why you're playing so badly.Xonar said:Well sorry for having my life revamped, jezus.
You're going to have to do better then that. First off, I don't believe character claims. Secondly, your avatar is refered to Farfechted from Pokémon, which is completely irrelavent to Dragonball Z.Xonar said:Oh btw, I'm bulma. You can pretty much search back in my posts because I've breadcrumbed it several times (1 time OS even pointed it out seeing it as just a reference to my ava)
Even if Bulma was a character in this game, we have no idea what role she has.Xonar said:100% chance to find AT LEAST 1 dragonball
Now you're resulting to telling me to get a brain? That's just sad.How about getting a brain?
I like this, and feel it should be used for hammering in the future.
Yeah, I'm not thinking it should. (I've seen a game where people have done this while being town, so it's not always a scumtell, but... It's just not a good strategy imo. You also talk as if it's some sort of huge new thing when it's probably been done a good deal of times in Mafia)Note: Whenever someone imposes some artificial deadline for their vote it's a huge scumtell. They are probably scum and should be immediately killed. (Vyse did this is Anime Mafia with his vote on Airgemini & I've seen it elsewhere. Scum love doing this because it's an easy way to vote without having to take consequence for the mislynch.)
I don't know how people want to interpret this, but I'm taking it literally. Bulma is just as likely to be a scum role as any other role, as far as we know. 100% chance of finding 1 ball each night could definitely be aligned to either side(though it wouldn't be an indy), so the claim doesn't do much imo.On second thought, I'll write up starting flavor when I get a chance. Rip in the space-time continuum besides bringing the villains of old has also seemed to change some personalities, so you no longer know who to trust and anyone could be evil, so you decide to go at this the only reasonable way: democratically vote people to murder at the end of everyday.
Take a stance, please.@Ronike: I never voted Rockin, my vote is currently on SSBF
@Rockin: If someone between Mentos and Xonar is scum I'd say it's Xonar but I don't really think either of them should be lynched toDay.
You too, besides Xonar, plz.
It was a breadcrumb. Thing is, Mentos, there is no such thing as 'fluff posts' or 'joke posts'. Every post has an INTENTION. The thing is, I don't see ANYONE besides Cello searching for true intentions. Cello reads every post like, what, 5 times? Then searches for the intention, then reevaluates himself and tries to line everything up. Afterwards, he probably looks if everything can be lined up in different ways and still make sense.Making jokes is reasonable when there's no real discussion going on. When we're actually in real discussion, why not try to focus on something relevant. And the opinion you dropped was pointless role-guessing, and, as I said, not at ALL related to the topic you presented at the start of the sentence. Thanks for flipping out though.
So you think that I'd suggest a plan and try to get everyone BLATANTLY modkilled? Yeah, I thought so. I think it's fine to just assume that I assumed that there was no punishment, just deconfirmation. Call this an appeal, but it's an appeal to common sense.What part of may not post the action seems like it allows for us to do so anyway without consequences? That's like saying "oh, we have to post every 72 hours, but let's just all not post, nothing will happen." Rules are there for a reason, not so that they can be broken without consequences. The fact that you say you didn't get this fact makes me more confident that you are covering your tracks, because really, it's quite blatant.
Ahem, it's better to just answer a question quickly if the person answering it is irrelevant. Again, there is no fluff.Answering questions directed at you? No. In fact I blatantly say that a 3 line post later isn't fluff because it was answering Cello's question to you. However, jumping in to answer a question directed at someone else with a one liner most definitely is just trying to up your post count, which can be very much construed as fluff.
Line2:Fluff. Also still in favor of mass search.
Line3:Still pushing this idea. Also, even if it WEREN'T against the rules, if scum gets one ball and bounces it around before making their posts saying to
Thus, you never, 3 lines later, said that it was answering cellos question to me... I don't even get how i answered cello's question. You're confusing me, Mentos. Elaboration please?trade them, town ends up endlessly searching even if all balls are in play.
Yo breadcrumb niggha. Beside that, people can think about the game between posts and actually change opinion or perspective, it's not flip-flopping, it's thinking.So, with no new information put out, what exactly changed your mind from it being farfetched to you assuming she does? Flip-flopping when it's more fitting to what's going on. Also, if there were no balls to be found and all in play, "checking if there are any left" would likely involve a mass search. If scum has a hidden ball at that point, they get to train while we waste time trying to find a dragonball that's already been found. Wonderful idea.
They're game breaking, just assume that. Don't try ot outsmart the mod. Thing is, it was not EXPLICITLY forbidden by the rules, like I explained.Really, I didn't? Because I seem to notice me pointing out the whole "your plan is explicitly forbidden by the rules" thing in my 190. But, it wasn't directed at you so you probably didn't realize that I had said anything about it. Also, depends on the wish, and since we have no idea what wishes are available, and the best one we HAVE seen is bringing someone back, I wouldn't make the trade for that. I would rather wait for it if we're going to be looking for an instant clear.
I talked to Ronike about my plan and he corrected some of my thoughts, which he then posted as a rule.Now, since you had given up on your plan before this point, why was this the part that made you not want to mass search? Your plan has no relevance because it was already given up when you made this comment. You gave up your plan before Ronike made it clear that breaking explicit rules would result in consequences, so why is it still relevant at the time of the second post, causing you to change stances on mass-search?
It's not pointless if I WAS ASKED IF I FIND HIM SCUMMY. It was answering a question, and at the point I didn't know if he was scummy or not. I had to answer soon or it'd be flat out ignoring.Thinking is fine. But, Making a post saying "hey, I don't know what to think about about this player, but don't feel like figuring it out" is a pointless post that, more importantly, rides the fence in a way that after the tide has gone one way or the other you can jump with it and never have to worry about contradicting yourself.
Obviously I had to repeat Nic because he didn't read it. Sorry for, again, answering questions where it doesn't matter who answers it. Seriously man, these kind of posts make me urge to insult the intelligence here. Too bad I don't want to ruin the fun for Ronike D:There is NO point for you to post that comment. Nic can handle his own arguments, he doesn't need you stepping in to tell people to read posts and that telling his plan ruins it. Congratulations on not only saying the same thing Nic had said, but responding for someone else.
Yeah, you won't buy that because you're making a case on me. Cool, but that totally adds nothing at all of worth to you not buying it.Way to respond to the fact that you called him out for something that he was not actually doing. You claim you just got it mixed up, but I really don't buy that.
6 posts of massive thinking. Besides, why would scum be distancing themselves from a townie? to make that townie look scummy when someone figures it out, of course. d'oh.Yes, what it could be construed as if both were to be scum(which, btw, you are fully opposed to the idea of a mere 6 of your posts later Cello is towniest of town.) Why would scum be distancing themselves from a townie? I'm glad your response was so whiny that I noticed this this time.
It's funny to insult people who make my head hurtYep, because the fun in the game is posting a random comment that in no way actually relates to the game being played in any way.
Opposites are VERY closely related. Yin/yang, ya know?Yes, because buddying(the act of anti-town siding with townies to make themselves look better when that person eventually dies or is cleared) and distancing(scum/anti-town multi-person groups voting/disagreeing with each other to make disconnections when one of them dies, making the other look better.) are in fact not total opposites. Oh wait, they are total opposites. Thanks for calling me an idiot when you apparently don't know what you're talking about though.
Confusing me again, Mentos. Which post was 'nowai' material again?Oh right, because you said you couldn't make a hard stance so early based on one action. Right. So that post was actually worthless "NOWAI" material. Gotcha.
Assume I will point at it later to justify possible inactivity all you want, ASSUME is the keyword here.You want to do it with some content? Fine. Doing it with that being the only thing in the post is just upping your post count so you can point at it later.
Elaborated on this already.Yes, I'm an idiot for stating the fact that you tried to take townie credit for suggesting people break rules made excessively clear. Way to respond to the argument and not just make an AtE... Oh wait.
I think I was the first to actually push on you, Mentos. I don't remember Cello doing it first, but not sure. On OS, I elaborated on Cello's assault on him, and actually figured parts of it out before Cello's post, but his helped my ideas line up, thus allowing me to be confident in voting him.Way to entirely miss the point of that entire comment. You made it sound like you had a town read on Cello because you've played games with him and thought you knew where he was going. This is after Cello has explained exactly where he was going so that has no relevance to your read, and doesn't make sense to be there. The other key point of my comment was that it's the first time you express any sort of opinion on me and OS immediately after Cello said he suspected us, without providing any reason. Your first opinions on either of us coming up like that with no explanation but saying we're both scum, and need to die?
3. words. change. everything.Seeing as I have never once called you answering a question directed at yourself fluff, and that has nothing to do with the comment you quoted anyway, not sure what that's about. And yeah, as I've said before there needs to be a far better wish than "revive X person" available for me to be willing to sacrifice a character/role big enough to be considered insta-clear. There are a couple I can think of, but risking outting a big role on D2 in the event that they may exist? No thank you.
Intentions, look at them intentions.Oh look, you can copy and paste! But what's this? A new section! Yes, calling people out on fluff in a one line post with nothing else said is just upping post count. One way to define fluff does include insubstantial posts that up post count.
haha I gotta admit this is funny, I didn't really have a point made in that section, so pretty solid answerXD
I was indeed not answering a question. Nice way to twist it, though. 2. words. change. everything.More copy and paste with a couple new words. You weren't answering a question, so you weren't "answering with a few words," you were making a comment on a flavor example, calling it assumptions. The very fact that you quoted the flavor, not the content of that post to respond makes it fluff instantly. Even if you had quoted the content of the post when posting that, he was obviously speculating and it's a worthless post. Either way, it's fluff.
Sigh...Tell me, where in this post does he say that Cello could be claiming bulletproof in the situation you described in your post. If you can point out one single instance in this post, the one which your response was to, that he says "Cello may not actually be bulletproof and saying he is to avoid nightkill" I'll give this one back. He doesn't though, so have fun trying to manufacture it.
It is hypothetical but an option. Considering options is worthless? I think my point is made.So, what was the point of that? You never implied that you thought his claim was fake, in fact everything you said was hypothetical, so yes, this post was pretty much worthless.
Close minded.Lynch all liars. Really, town shouldn't need to lie. Yeah, town can lie, but when they do it just comes back and bites town in the *** because they end up getting lynched when it's learned they lied. Not to mention some lies are reasonable(eg Cello lying who he investigated in Millers Hollow), whereas lying about one's role is assuredly not so.
You trying to get me lynched by posting a case full of flawed arguments is why.Nope, just tired of everyone thinking 2 words is a reasonable argument around here. You want me lynched because you think I'm scummy, show why I'm scummy, don't just up your post count by saying Kill X.
We don't have evidence yet. Though, I might just find 2 balls today making me a clear. (also why I said that there could very well be a day2 clear)Seeing as I agree with your original stance that it's not likely Bulma has a 100% chance to find Dragonballs, and I would trust most people in this game to make an intelligent choice where to hand them, I would rather not give scum a chance to get them without working on it. Not to mention you're operating on the assumption a role exists that we have no evidence does exist.
Knowing who asked what has a purpose because... read my comment on Cello's assault.What purpose is that? Is there any benefit to you saying you asked Ronike about it? Were you being asked to say if you had? No. So the eagerness looks bad along with the fact that there was absolutely no reason for you to post that. Cello's question is irrelevant to the problem I pointed out with the posts, seeing as I straight up said there was nothing wrong with the second post because it was the answer to a question.
You're saying that scums are hypocrites but townies arent?Being a hypocrite is a much stronger scumtell than town-tell. If town is looking at something as a scumtell, they try to avoid it in their own posts. Scum are more likely to call someone out for scummy behavior while doing it to a noticeable extent themselves.
Sorry man I'm not just your average townie. I don't like the whole 'WELL, OFTEN, PEOPLE DO THIS' argument anyway.And I just remembered I forgot to include this in my response to Xonar, but I feel it is important to why my vote went on him this time and not the last.
In his response to me, he repeatedly turned to insults and negative phrases. In my experience, cornered town is likely to use logic and refute arguments, if not calmly, in a reasonable way, trying to convince town. Cornered scum is more likely to turn to insults and negativity against those who make a case on them, because it can invoke an emotional response that leads to town questioning the argument more. Emotional responses don't look the same as reasonable ones, and often look a lot weaker. Just felt that I should point out this piece because, as I said, it influenced my vote going on him instead of waiting for his re-rebuttal beforehand.
Thus I claimed. It was coming anyway.Xonar, you're really making it difficult to move on -_-;;
Give us something.
I don't like this post at all. Calling it a scummy post because I refute his flawed arguments with simple answers? K man, sorry.Ugh, Xonar can die. Mentos makes a legit PBPA, and Xonar replies to it with one of the longest most worthless scummiest posts I have ever seen in a game of mafia. Xonar's reply is basically one long rant about Mentos being an idiot. Without any backing whatsoever. If he wasn't at L-1 I'd vote him, and I'm still tempted to hammer.
@Xonar
You have until Monday to change my mind, and if you can't do so, I'm going to hammer.
@Everyone else
Can we please stop trying to meta the setup? I'm pretty sure that Ronike is smart enough to make a game that can't be broken so easily. And even if there was a way to break it, he'd alter the rules to prevent it (as he did with Xonar and Cello's plans).
I've contacted Ronike multiple times. I'll search my history in a while if I saved it and will answer.@Xonar: There's something I need to clear up. How many times have you contacted Ronike about this game, and when did you do so? What did you ask each time, and how, exactly, did you word it? Also, what did you mean by "I don't think that falseclaiming bulletproof/hated/lovers is scummy"?
First of all, Xonar, welcome to the gameMentos's recruiter scare does nothing for me. If a recruiter was part of a mafia team, compared to solo (which I adamantly believe will never happen on SWF with the current metagame) or one shot, then he's probably character specific like Vader in Scum Wars (also a Tom game). Babidi comes to mind. As does Vegeta and/or Buu.
@Mentos: You took the opportunity provided by Xonar, someone you find "scummy", to unvote OS, presumably because said "scummy" person is pushing for his lynch. When did OS actually change your mind about how his actions are no longer scummy?
Because someone can simply post the command multiple times or even post the number of stars on a dragonballs backSo, by May 2, you were aware that you could give individual Balls to other players. I thought that you believed that a player could only trade ALL of their Balls, so that if they tried to trade them to another player we'd know they didn't have them anymore. Why then, did you continue to believe that your plan to mass trade would work, even if Ronike was willing to confirm that someone didn't have any Balls to trade (seeing as scum could slip under the radar by giving their real Balls to someone else to hold, then say Give All Dragonballs to Player, then get them back)?
orGive dragonball to Mentos (1)
Give dragonball to mentos (2)
Give dragonball to mentos (3)
Give dragonball to mentos (4)
Give dragonball to mentos (5)
Give dragonball to mentos (6)
Give dragonball to mentos (7)
Give 1star dragonball to mentos
Give 2star dragonball to mentos
Give 3star dragonball to mentos
Give 4star dragonball to mentos
Give 5star dragonball to mentos
Give 6star dragonball to mentos
Give 7star dragonball to mentos