Been a while since I've done one of these. Welcome my indepth analysis of scumnar's play so far.
Okay Jungle, I guess I'll have to do with you man. So the thing is, me and Ryker were gonna be in-game hydra's. You mind doin' dat **** niggha?
Sup Jungle what's yo role and who do you think is suspect let's get this hydra rollin
![Oh Well :ohwell: :ohwell:]()
Cello is insane if he thinks I'm going to trust him with my balls [lol] even if we do a mass-search. On the topic of mass-searching, I think bulma having a 100% chance or summit is kinda farfetched, but yeah.
Jokingly rolefishing. More importantly carrying a joke that was not running at all into actual discussion. Not a big thing, but there. Then you say on the topic of mass-searching followed by... Well... Nothing at all related to the topic. Good job there.
I haven't completely read OS's post yet, but I'm going to suggest something:
I say we make everyone post the command of trading a dragonball tomorrow with someone else, that way we know who has a dragonball for future trading, this way scum can't get away with lying that they have no dragonball. After the trade, the person who received the ball should trade it back, if he doesn't, he's guarenteed scum.
With that said, I agree to a mass search tonight.
Wow, way to suggest we do something that could potentially get everyone with no dragonballs modkilled. Why would you suggest that we do something that is BLATANTLY AGAINST THE RULES? I know this has already been brought up, but that's like saying "everyone post your role pm!" Also, for later notice, you currently agree with a mass search.
The faster we wish the more broken town will be.
Fluff. Also still in favor of mass search.
Those are no problems, lol. Think about it.
People without balls (this game is gonna be epic) will use the command and then Ronike will deconfirm their ability to trade, allowing us to know who doesn't have balls xD and who does.
You wouldn't have to trust someone else, if the other person doesn't trade it back he's instantscum and will be lynched without a doubt.
Still pushing this idea. Also, even if it WEREN'T against the rules, if scum gets one ball and bounces it around before making their posts saying to trade them, town ends up endlessly searching even if all balls are in play.
Scum won't receive anything, we can make pairs and have those people trade with each other, with a 3 man pair because there are 15 (with 2 kills 13 i guess?) people.
Scum knowing who has balls and who not is, admittedly, a disadvantage, but say we have someone who can be cleared tomorrow with a good claim n stuff (which is not all that farfetched in this setup tbh) we can get a wish on d2...!
You assume that we'll be able to find all the balls by D2, suggest outting a role that would be insta-cleared(meaning, a strong claim that would be better to hide for a while), all for the sake of getting one wish earlier than later. Coupled with the fact that scum can easily hide their balls, don't see how this is even potentially advantageous as a plan.
Right, didn't factor this in. Nvm then.
Here's your response to it being pointed out just one of the problems with your plan. One liner, just give up on it.
Aka I don't want to mass search
Suddenly against mass search because not everyone can use the trade command. Well, if you were still behind your idea of doing so, this would make sense. However, you say this rule changes your opinion despite already ruling out your plan to have everyone post the command. Since you had given up on your plan, why is it that you decide no mass searching apparently solely because said plan couldn't work... Makes sense?(this was in response to Ronike's 185 in which he makes the consequences clear.)
I'm not sure if I find Cello scummy or not yet. Should think this over but I really cba atm. Excuse moi.
Hm, don't know if he's scummy or not, but can't be bothered to try to figure it out right now. Ride the fence much?
Telling it defeats the purpose. Read his posts.
Don't see the point of this post. Essentially fluff
Wow TPK, I don't like your vibes at all.
Vote: TPK
He has a theory, let him do what he wants to do. You're also mass buddying Cello, me not like.
Vote on TPK, calling him out for buddying Cello(which wasn't the case as you admit in just a few posts, I'll respond to that when I get there). I also want to point out that you find him buddying Cello scummy. We'll get to why that's important later.
Having a first vote on Cello is irrelevant.
As TPK said, voting for someone and being decidedly against their ideas very much is relevant with an accusation of buddying.
LOL replacement gonna die mayne
Um, what replacement? Worthless fluff post.
Yeah TPK wasn't buddying but also distancing and I accidently took it both as the same.
Don't get the resistance to Nick's plan, just let the guy do his job man.
Yes, because the ideas of buddying and distancing are so very close that you clearly got them mixed up. If you're going to pull something like that, at least don't say you thought two words with extremely different meanings were "both the same".
People can hardly make a hard stance this early based on 1 action.
And yet, you want to take a hard stance to the point of lynching about 24 hours later. Was that one day REALLY such a big difference from that. Why do you think it's too early for people to have a hard stance yesterday, but today think the entire town should agree to a lynch?
Wow, what a great post! Fluff extreme
Wow so much to reply to, but I just like to say that SSBF, you shouldn't base town/scum reads on activity and content. That said, I suggested a potentially good idea for town, that's more than people like YOU have done. Beside that, there was hardly ANYTHING I could contribute as there was only some moronic discussion about Nick's plan.
/reading..
A post that pretty much says "I don't know" in a whole paragraph. Not to mention, you suggested a "potentially good idea for town"? The only plan you suggested was for people to explicitly break the rules. How is this even potentially good? In fact, if anything, it was feigning activity for a "plan" that obviously would never go through because it was against the rules. Felt it necessary to make yourself sound good for doing nothing that could have possibly helped?
I wonder how anyone can still find Cello scummy, after playing several games with him I think I somewhat knows what goes on in his head. I'm really not liking Mentos atm, most of everyone. Unvote, Vote: Mentos
Cello, while I agree that OS isn't looking that good, don't you want to go with Mentos first?
I think most is said and done, there is no reason to just parrot Cello to gain 'town points'. Why would I shoot when the bullseye is already hit?
Hm, earlier you said you didn't know what to think about Cello, now suddenly you don't see how anyone can find him scummy? Oh wait, it's after he has come out and claimed and explained what he was doing. So uh, where does the whole playing games with him have any relevance? That's right, it doesn't anymore because the entire thought process was spelled out. This is also the post where you first express suspicion of me. Incidentally, it's your first content-containing post since Cello expressed suspicion of me. You also immediately jump to OS, which is in fact your first opinion on him all game, also after Cello expressed suspicion on him. I'll get back to this in a little bit as well.
If not, they can be given to someone who can be cleared on d2 due to role, there's enough chance that such a role exists.
Yep, great idea yet again, outting a role that can be considered inst-cleared on D2. Outting roles like that early is definitely the best course of action /sarcasm.
Nice fluff there Xonar.
OS, you're assuming Cello knows the wishes and knows that he can wish to be unlynchable, while that isn't even sure AT ALL. Too much of a gambit to do that.
Actually, he was suggesting that anyone who makes a wish may have wishes available not listed in the OP that are very much worth it for scum to make, even if it involves sacrificing one for them.
Assumptions assumptions...
More fluff, yay!
True, we can still just lynch though.
Btw, OS, pointing out that him claiming bulletproof effectively made him bulletproof without being bulletproof destroys the use of claiming, because he might not be bulletproof anymore... if you catch my drift. Sigh.
*facepalm* I'm not even sure what that first line refers to, probably relating to OS pointing out that scum getting the dragonballs is bad? The second point is just fluff, straight up. Not to mention, OS NEVER SAID THAT! He never even suggested the idea that Cello wasn't actually bp in the post you were responding to.
Not saying his claim was false though
Nice follow up. Really. Can you stop the fluff? Or were you just trying to make up for putting the idea you came up with in your post before this one?
With the players in this game, I am amazed someone figured it out.
Besides, I don't think that falseclaiming bulletproof/hated/lovers is scummy.
Pointless insults, followed by one of the worst lines I have EVER seen in a mafia game. False-claiming isn't scummy? Since when!?! If someone is lying about their claim it is exceptionally scummy, and they should be lynched/vigged as soon as it's made clear that they lied. Terrible, terrible post.
Ohai! Second time you've mentioned me all game on a one liner not even 2 days into the game. What were you saying earlier about it being too early to have a hard stance? But oh, Cello is suspicious of mentos, so kill him!
I think self hammering is best because Bulma is most probably town aligned and she probably has a scouter (or can train to get one)
Pointless speculation, and what does that have to do with anything. First of all self hammering is not the best course of action, second of all, what does the rest of that have to do with anything? "oh, it's best to let them be lost from play, because there's possibly a character that possibly has an ability that will help find them! Or may not have an ability but can train to get one!" That is speculation gone crazy to support a move that isn't inherently better than any other solution.
I confirm to have asked Ronike about it.
Yay, 2 great one line posts. The first one for... No real reason. Ronike stated multiple players asked him about it, why was there a need for you to jump out and say "I DID!"? You weren't being questioned about if you did, it has no bearing on the game, just an attempt to get an extra post in. The second post I can't say the same about solely because you were asked after the first.
Yeah doc protect me.
OS, could you stop buddying me with that pls. ty.
Response to OS saying someone protect you, which strikes me as wrong. What bothers me more is this is the second time you call someone out for buddying, when you have been buddying Cello for a while now, and it gets worse coming up.
Wonderful reasonless vote change. Oh wait! Your reason was because Cello told you to, that's right. Way to think for yourself and not just blindly follow someone who is not clear.
Everyone not voting or not voting overswarm/hilt/mentos needs to rethink
And what a twist! After Cello adds hilt to his list of who he thinks is scum and says that the scumteam is OS, me, and hilt early D1(not sure why there's speculation of the scum-team this early, although I expect it from Cello), you say that everyone not following one of Cello's choices needs to rethink. Yep, makes sense for everyone to do what an unclear wants.
Shows the level of idiocricy in this game.
Shower then elaborate on Mentos.
More petty insults, followed by your promise that you will elaborate on the case you supposedly have against me.
Will probably do it some time soonish, kinda cba atm. Sowwies.
Oh, for the second time this game, you "cba" to do something. First it was thinking over what was going on with Cello, now with making a case against someone you're dead-set is scum. Why don't you actually post something useful for once this game instead of just being unwilling to make the effort? You throw out insults when you have done nothing all day except suggest everyone break the rules, and aren't willing to do anything useful for the game.
Admitting to skimming *thumbs up*
Yay fluff
Pushing for a quicklynch. From this point on I have responded to all of your posts and this analysis will come to an end.
I'm going to
Unvote for now.
Xonar, you have flip-flopped on stances, tried to take credit for helping town by suggesting an idea that could not have gone through seeing as it was explicitly forbidden by the rules. You have called people out for buddying, but ever since Cello's big posts around when he claimed have buddied him entirely, to the point of calling anyone not voting one of his suspicions idiots. Many of your posts are throwaways. You said yesterday that it was too early for any single person to have a hard stance yet, but today you suggest we quicklynch OS. You claim to have a case on me, then when you say you will post it you "cba" to do so, and proceed to distract from that fact by calling me scummy for suggesting a blatantly pro-town maneuver. I do not like your play so far, and you have earned yourself a nice high spot on my suspicions.
Oh, and before you say it, this is not OMGUS, seeing as I have laid a pretty thorough case, so no shooting back "OH MY GOD YOU SUCK! YOU'RE JUST VOTING ME CUZ IM SUSPICIOUS OF U!"