Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's an unspoken law that everyone in Smash makes at least one person mad. Search anything along the lines of "[character] shouldn't have gotten in Smash," or "[character] is a terrible newcomer," someone will have a post on some forum or made a video expressing their anger, if not specifically towards their inclusion, then their implementation. And then there's times the person is just upset that they got added over their favorite.
ok that is actually pretty good
I don't know, but I would definitely want Marco from Metal Slug as a playable character in the next Smash Bros! I do think the Samurai Showdown rep may be more likely, though.
60% Nakoruru, 30% Metal Slug, 10% other.
That explains his sword moves a bit heh
Don't worry, they will "resurrect" it by adding the all-time fan favorite ClayFighter.
It might be for licensing reasons, which is unfortunate as it's the only non-Nintendo console available.
Is there additional licensing that needs to be done when Sega doesn't own a Genesis game? Like, did the Wily Wars require both Capcom and Sega's approval?
Yeah. I'm saying that it's licensing issues that is preventing the NSO Genesis library from being updated. Also, I'm wondering if we'll see other consoles on it in the future.
Probably Nakoruru since her moveset translates pretty well to a platform fighter.
I've not got much clue, but I'll be very sad if we get no more MD updates from now on. People might dismiss it as a retread of the same bajillion MD collections we get every generation, but not only is the emulation AFAIK better than in those, they managed to get plenty of really cool third-parties in there, and in the more recent updates they were actively starting to dig out some big rarities that have been stuck in the vault for a long time, like Pulseman and Crusader of Centy. If they'd kept up with that and released more cool less-often-rereleased stuff, it would have been really nice, but they've seemingly just stopped, and with unfinished business at that - for example, Centy's finally been added, but they still haven't added Ranger-X, another high-quality first-party title from the same devs that also has been completely missing from past collections and initiatives. Plus there's Monster World IV, stuff like Atomic Runner on the third-party side........it'll be a shame if we just get nothing like that anymore.
Then came Byleth who made even more fans angrier as usual.
Oops! Yeah, I forgot about that.
I sure hope I don't get Greninja'd
it’s been four years. Have the Dante fans recovered?
Something tells me that my making the amphibian post was "coincidental fate", if you know what I mean.
Speaking of this, would Ivysaur also count as an amphibian, or amphibian like creature?
If I can change between each one, that would be sweet!
Would be cool but their chance is low
Considering Venusaur's running animation in games like Let's Go has it hopping after the player like a frog, I'm pretty sure Ivysaur would count as at least a partial frog.
You kind of make it sound like third party anime swordsmen are more popular than Nintendo ones. I understand that is not what you are trying to get at. Feel free to post an example with a popular Nintendo anime swordsman, though honestly, you don’t have to here.
I was in the camp of it being Yuri Lowell from Tales of Vesperia. lol
Well all the DLC characters had a base of an existing character, if I'm not mistaken. It's just a launch pad to work off an existing framework, it doesn't mean they'd play at all the same.
Link is the most popular Nintendo anime swordsman. He's just already in Smash Bros. to begin with.
Well those two third-party anime swordsmen were more popular than those two/three Nintendo ones. They're Sephiroth and Sora.
Huh, thanks. Though I am not sure why you answered, since I was expecting Dream1ng to answer, but that DOES help.
Trust me, I know being third party OR first party does not matter. I was just saying what I said because you used two Nintendo characters as the non-popular examples and two third party characters as popular examples in that last your post of yours. It probably does not mean anything, but I hope you don't mind me pointing that out, even if it was unnecessary.
That's because they were chronologically the last four sword-wielding anime style characters we got, and the vacillating dichotomy between them was fairly pronounced regarding those complaints.
