you think that’s delusional you should see the British people during an election
You're lying just to make an excuse to talk about Project X Zone again. I REFUSE to believe you were that legit delusional.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
you think that’s delusional you should see the British people during an election
You're lying just to make an excuse to talk about Project X Zone again. I REFUSE to believe you were that legit delusional.
Shadow as a Ken-style Echo, Eggman as a unique fighter; it's perfect!I'm good with Shadow, but I really want Dr. Eggman to be in too(and Tails, but Eggman's a bit higher priority). Like...can we get both Shadow and Dr. Eggman in Smash Bros?
I want Eggman too, and personally, I want him playable. I like Eggman (and Tails) better than Shadow.I'm good with Shadow, but I really want Dr. Eggman to be in too(and Tails, but Eggman's a bit higher priority). Like...can we get both Shadow and Dr. Eggman in Smash Bros?
you think that’s delusional you should see the British people during an election
that is the face they make when they vote
British people have elections?!
Jk.
I thought that was the face Americans and Canadians make when the person they voted in doesn't keep their promises.that is the face they make when they vote
hmm I think there are some users here who will dispute that. so excuse me while I run for coverNo shade, but I feel like a lot of the people who want Smash to keep building on Ultimate and propping up the "everyone is here!" shtick for the rest of eternity don't actually play the game.
Now hear me out, I know it sounds weird. But a lot of them seem to straight up not care at all about the game's mechanics, modes, graphics, and any content aside from the roster of playable characters. They're here for the Internet hype, but disregard anything aside from the crossover aspect of Smash.
It's just dawned on me that—especially after Ultimate—a lot of people treat Smash as a cultural phenomenon rather than... a video game.
This feels very...... Untrue.No shade, but I feel like a lot of the people who want Smash to keep building on Ultimate and propping up the "everyone is here!" shtick for the rest of eternity don't actually play the game.
Now hear me out, I know it sounds weird. But a lot of them seem to straight up not care at all about the game's mechanics, modes, graphics, and any content aside from the roster of playable characters. They're here for the Internet hype, but disregard anything aside from the crossover aspect of Smash.
It's just dawned on me that—especially after Ultimate—a lot of people treat Smash as a cultural phenomenon rather than... a video game.
That's sort of what I'm saying though... those people want a quick fix, a little hype boost and a huge roster of video game icons to just stare at. But they don't actually seem to play the game itself. They don't care that Ultimate's singleplayer is lackluster, they don't care about the oversights in its mechanics, like the buffer and movement issues, they don't care that some of the characters don't even get a chance to shine and are stuck with questionable movesets (Ganondorf, Sonic).This feels very...... Untrue.
Here's a fact. In terms of hype, "Everyone is Here" is going to have extremely diminish returns. Ultimate Deluxe is not going to bring the same internet hype as a true sequel. They just wouldn't. It's a safe business choice. It's a feel good knowing you won't lose your favourite character, but it wouldn't generate the same internet hype
I agree that Smash is treated as a cultural phenomenon by a not insignificant group of people. You really just phrased it perfectly here, people like seeing hype reveals, and then playing the game for a bit (sometimes not even that) before dipping back into the shadows.That's sort of what I'm saying though... those people want a quick fix, a little hype boost and a huge roster of video game icons to just stare at. But they don't actually seem to play the game itself. They don't care that Ultimate's singleplayer is lackluster, they don't care about the oversights in its mechanics, like the buffer and movement issues, they don't care that some of the characters don't even get a chance to shine and are stuck with questionable movesets (Ganondorf, Sonic).
They're into Smash as a concept, as an idea; a gaming crossover of enormous scale.
But they don't seem to show the same type of love to Smash the game.
While I agree with what you're saying, this is...pretty much the real reason I tried to come up with a way to do the BCP thing with Smash in the first place. The BCP also came with balance/gameplay tweaks starting with Wave 3, and the meta needs a shakeup, either from Steve nerfs or undoing the removal of things like shield platform dropping.they don't care about the oversights in its mechanics, like the buffer and movement issues
.That's sort of what I'm saying though... those people want a quick fix, a little hype boost and a huge roster of video game icons to just stare at. But they don't actually seem to play the game itself. They don't care that Ultimate's singleplayer is lackluster, they don't care about the oversights in its mechanics, like the buffer and movement issues, they don't care that some of the characters don't even get a chance to shine and are stuck with questionable move-sets (Ganondorf, Sonic).
They're into Smash as a concept, as an idea; a gaming crossover of enormous scale.
But they don't seem to show the same type of love to Smash the game.
That's not really "internet hype" thoughThat's sort of what I'm saying though... those people want a quick fix, a little hype boost and a huge roster of video game icons to just stare at. But they don't actually seem to play the game itself. They don't care that Ultimate's singleplayer is lackluster, they don't care about the oversights in its mechanics, like the buffer and movement issues, they don't care that some of the characters don't even get a chance to shine and are stuck with questionable movesets (Ganondorf, Sonic).
They're into Smash as a concept, as an idea; a gaming crossover of enormous scale.
But they don't seem to show the same type of love to Smash the game.
Honestly, same here, in regards to wanting revamped characters. I wouldn't want another Pikmin character before they fix Olimar..
I wholeheartedly agree.
My most wanted are actually a revamped ;
Palutena = revamped
Samus = revamped
Pit = reworked
I want it to, but keeping expectations low as much as I can.They're putting a lot of focus on Shadow recently, probably because of the upcoming third movie.
Maybe that'll translate into a Smash inclusion?
Also what the heck is a buffer?
Wholeheartedly disagree.No shade, but I feel like a lot of the people who want Smash to keep building on Ultimate and propping up the "everyone is here!" shtick for the rest of eternity don't actually play the game.
Now hear me out, I know it sounds weird. But a lot of them seem to straight up not care at all about the game's mechanics, modes, graphics, and any content aside from the roster of playable characters. They're here for the Internet hype, but disregard anything aside from the crossover aspect of Smash.
It's just dawned on me that—especially after Ultimate—a lot of people treat Smash as a cultural phenomenon rather than... a video game.
I'm probably the only one who still actively supports her in this site.Can’t believe I forgot about Lara Croft with that list. She’d be a great addition. Lilith from Borderlands is another often overlooked character.
Now see I'm inclined to agree that a new game with constant character reveals of new and old characters is going to be more successful in generating and sustaining excitement than simply announcing everyone is coming back again.I actually think having cuts would generate more internet buzz than doing everyone is here again. You'll still get those sensational newcomer reveals, but suddenly every veteran who is revealed will generate some hype, especially since a lot more characters are in danger of being cut than before (I think a lot more than some are willing to admit)
Completely new moveset for Ganondorf. Classic Ganondorf moveset goes to Black Shadow.No matter what form his moveset takes, whether Falcondorf returns or they redesign him totally, some form of Ganon(dorf) just has to be there.
Perhaps I could interest you in some...When it comes to "grandfathered" or legacy characters, people are largely inconsistent. People often defend Ness, Captain Falcon, Jigglypuff, Ice Climbers and Mr. G&W, but propose others like Sheik, Falco, Roy and R.O.B. should be cut.
I'll be totally honest...you're not ENTIRELY wrong.No shade, but I feel like a lot of the people who want Smash to keep building on Ultimate and propping up the "everyone is here!" shtick for the rest of eternity don't actually play the game.
Now hear me out, I know it sounds weird. But a lot of them seem to straight up not care at all about the game's mechanics, modes, graphics, and any content aside from the roster of playable characters.
I don't think you understand what I mean. I'm not saying everyone who wants no cuts doesn't play the game, but a specific group of people that's very into hyping up reveals/requesting characters is also the exact same group that barely cares about the game once it's actually out. And even then, they continue hyping up DLC reveals (throwing a fit if the characters don't fall into their fabled "ultra #Gaming crossover icon" category) but still don't care about the gameplay, mechanics, content aside from characters.That's not really "internet hype" though
For the record. I would prefer to keep building on Smash Ultimate. I don't want my favourite characters cut. I also have more hours in Smash than any other game. I would like Smash to have an extended development time in order to address some of the concerns that come with a larger development time. To bring back some event matches, more creative methods to unlock characters. A single player with platforming challenges.
That said, I also disagree with some of your statements. I don't think Ultimate had a "lackluster" single player. I know world of light ain't for everyone, but I enjoyed collecting all the spirits in the game. Doing the spirit battles, which aren't that dissimilar to Event Match. Would I want spirits again? Nah, I'd hope for something new. But they served their purpose and were fun. I also think Smash Ultimate has one of the best classic modes in the whole series. The unique theming for each character adds a lot.
Does Ultimate have the best single player? No, that's Brawl followed by Melee. But it was a massive step up from Smash Wii U which had the worst Classic mode in the series, and nothing else to really compensate.
Also what the heck is a buffer?
Interesting perspective, but I'm still not entirely convinced. I understand your love for Ultimate and wouldn't lump you (and many other Ult fans) in with the "CSS starers" but there still is many of them. It just seems wild to me that the competitive metagame, singleplayer/co-op modes, stages, collectibles, graphics have taken a backseat, even this late into Ultimate's life to arguing over the sanctity and holiness of maintaining a huge roster because "Smash is a gaming crossover" and "Smash's claim to fame is the dream matchups between gaming icons". "Everyone is here" being maintained would mean that everything would not be, and I'd rather not go through that again.Wholeheartedly disagree.
I still play Smash regularly (I'm even running through WoL again). I play at a competitive level and i consider myself a hardcore Smash fan. I personally want Ultimate to continue because getting every vet back was my dream game (along with a Pokemon Stadium 3). Quite literally my dream come true moment. The gameplay is some of the best it's ever been and I actually prefer many of its aspects to that if older games (classic mode, spirits, etc.). I personally never see Smash reaching this peak again. It's incredibly hard to shake the feeling that we'll never have it this good again. It's all downhill from here in regards to content, characters, stages and music.
Is Ultimate perfect? No. There's a lot of issues. But many of those issues can be fixed with patches, or ports to new hardware. Are there "character select screen starers?" Yeah there's a lot. And they're obnoxious. They don't treat the fighting game like a fighting game. In my experience they're the ones who make these strange choices for cuts like Sheik or Falco because it would "make representation better." But those people are few and far between.
I personally want more Ultimate because i love playing this game so much. It's hard to sell me on a new Smash because I can't imagine a bigger and better one. I personally don't think Ultimate will ever be revisited. The only path I see forward is something radically different and who knows if that different will even work.
Regardless it's not fair to throw lots of people in the "No True Scotsman" camp. People who want Ultimate to continue aren't CSS starers. We play the game. We love it so much, we don't want to leave.
Smash's main attraction is its multiplayer. Of course I'm not gonna be crazy and say, half the roster should be cut to make way for a campaign.Perhaps I could interest you in some...
View attachment 383857
Pure, uncut, consistency.
I'll be totally honest...you're not ENTIRELY wrong.
It's true that, compared to the roster of playable characters, things like modes, balance, modes, etc. mean little to me.
Bold statement to make of a game with terrible netcode. Also, speaking for yourself.Smash's main attraction is its multiplayer.
And ended with just as many as any other Smash game.Base Ult had to bring back 65 vets (many of which were straight up ported from SSB4 with minor adjustments) and still only gave us a measly 5 brand new fighters
Whatever the imagined cost you think EiH has, didn't prevent Ultimate from being the best Smash game to date.I think "EiH 2.0" truthers aren't thinking of the disastrous consequences their super hype #gaming scenario would bring.
Offline multiplayer still exists.Bold statement to make of a game with terrible netcode
Fair.Offline multiplayer still exists.
Oh, got it. So you wanna pay full price for the same content you already paid for, and then have the actual new content be drip-fed to you at a higher price too. Some of y'all think interestingly!And ended with just as many as any other Smash game.
As opposed to...paying full price for the same content you already paid for, and then have the OLD content be drip-fed to you at a higher price. Which is what will happen with a new Smash game, when they start selling veterans back to you as DLC. Just like in Smash 4.Oh, got it. So you wanna pay full price for the same content you already paid for, and then have the actual new content be drip-fed to you at a higher price too. Some of y'all think interestingly!
I have no idea how you came to this conclusion. Just because they want "Everyone is Here" again, they...don't actually play the game? That doesn't make any sense to me.That's sort of what I'm saying though... those people want a quick fix, a little hype boost and a huge roster of video game icons to just stare at. But they don't actually seem to play the game itself. They don't care that Ultimate's singleplayer is lackluster, they don't care about the oversights in its mechanics, like the buffer and movement issues, they don't care that some of the characters don't even get a chance to shine and are stuck with questionable movesets (Ganondorf, Sonic).
They're into Smash as a concept, as an idea; a gaming crossover of enormous scale.
But they don't seem to show the same type of love to Smash the game.